Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What are we working on now, 280 days without a formal press conference and abosolutely no whining from LSM?.....that's a good indication.....just giving her a pass....
BINGO!Some simply don't like it because it goes against the Hillary. But if it were Bush doing something highly questionable or illegal..........
Please do....3 complaints in 280+ days....I am underwhelmed........No, they haven't. In fact, it's been a near-constant refrain, even in the hard-left rags I read. Washington Post criticized her for it. So did Slate. Here's NBC News. Shall I continue?
Those were just the first ones that came to mind. I've seen such complaints from just about every mainstream news source.Please do....3 complaints in 280+ days....I am underwhelmed.....
The United State of America hacks into other foreign accounts on a regular basis. It's the way it's done.
No, I don't believe that.What, you don't believe the US has never worked with enemies to attain a goal?....in this case the truth?
Indeed. How do you distinguish fact from propaganda in what they choose to make public when coming from a foreign power that wishes to forward its own interests at the expense of your own?
No, I don't believe that.
If people want to believe information from a source they would otherwise view as untrustworthy, simply because in that instance it validates their existing beliefs, that is their choice. Don't expect others to accord it the same status, though.
Please show me where I have been "weighing the evidence" before it has been produced.I'll refrain from weighing the evidence until it's produced.
How about you?
We worked with the Taliban against Russia; how did that work out for us?No, I don't believe that.
If people want to believe information from a source they would otherwise view as untrustworthy, simply because in that instance it validates their existing beliefs, that is their choice. Don't expect others to accord it the same status, though.
Just remember though that the info on the DNC fixing the primary so that Hillary would be the choice no matter what turned out to be true.
I stated the US has worked with enemies to attain a goal, you said you don't believe it and I provided an example. If you refuse to believe facts, that's your problem.Well, I think you were quite happy with the situation at the time.
Later on, not so much.
Kind of underlines my point, don't you think?
Were they enemies when you armed them? Or were they only really classed as enemies much later on?I stated the US has worked with enemies to attain a goal, you said you don't believe it and I provided an example. If you refuse to believe facts, that's your problem.
They were unfriendlies we used to attain a goal; Russia was kicked out......Were they enemies when you armed them? Or were they only really classed as enemies much later on?
What are we working on now, 280 days without a formal press conference and abosolutely no whining from LSM?.....that's a good indication.....just giving her a pass....
You know, when a bounty hunter captures a criminal in a foreign country and takes them before a judge, the judge does not care about the circumstances of the defendants appearance. Being there is all that matters.....same with the emails....I don't care about how someone acquired them, I just want to see them.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?