• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

This doesn't seem right

Rurik

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2007
463
15
✟683.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't think people in AA will tell alcoholics to be concerned about communion wine.

I worked with one priest who was a recovering alcoholic of the AA variety. He would not partake of the wine in any circumstance and the instructions for the servers was to do all the purification.
 
Upvote 0

Sean611

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2012
965
150
Missouri
✟35,596.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
At the distribution of Communion in the small chapel, the priest went around with a minister. But when he came to me, I think he looked a bit perplexed on what he should do, he holds up the Host and says "The Body of Christ", shows it to me in front of my face, then puts it away. The whole thing seemed very ackward. Soon afterward the minister with the chalice followed behind him and seemed to walk past me until I gestured to bring the Chalice to me as I wanted to receive it. I left feeling grateful that I had received communion at all but upset that the whole thing was handled in what felt like a haphazard fashion. In some ways, I think I'd just prefer the Medieval practice of "Ocular Communion", where the laity don't actually receive the species at all, to what is going on.

The fact that this happened to you makes me disgusted as it represents a lack of good training and pastoral care on the part of the priest and Eucharistic minister. When I was training to become a Eucharistic minister, the manual that was used for training instructed that there are to be no interrogations or awkward questioning at the rail. It is not our job, at the rail, to interrogate someone on whether or not they have really been baptized or if they received the host or not. If a parishioner/visitor does not want to receive communion at all, they are to cross their arms and go to their seat after the priest's blessing. However, if they don't take the host and stay for the chalice, then it is only proper to offer the chalice to the communicant. Seems like standard stuff to me. Regardless of how often this happens or not is irrelevant, the priest and minister should always be prepared. Things like this happen all the time at my parish and we are quite small and have had no problems like this. It all goes back to good training and being prepared.
 
Upvote 0

MKJ

Contributor
Jul 6, 2009
12,260
776
East
✟38,894.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I remember the story of missionaries in the Amazon jungle who did communion with Coca-Cola and potato chips, because that was all they had. Just my opinion, but under the circumstances I think it was valid. The substances were wrong, but their hearts were right with God, doing the best they could with what they had.

But, hey, what do I know? I'm a former Pentecostal and still new to the apostolic/liturgical way of doing things. :p

Seriously, I do believe real wine is the proper/best thing to use. But there are people who aren't allowed to have it for medical reasons, or because they're recovering alcoholics afraid that it might cause a relapse. And also there are those with a personal conviction against consuming alcohol. I disagree with that, but I can respect it. I think in any of those circumstances it's best to settle for what you can have, rather than forgo it entirely. Possibly non-alcoholic wine might be an acceptable compromise? Though I've never had that and don't know if any of it is any good.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I think I'll pour myself a nice glass of cabernet. :)

What people might try and make work in an extreme situation is not quite the same as just choosing to use something different.

In any case, it is possible to get wine that has the same sort of alcohol content as juice, so it would make more sense to use that.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
MKJ said:
What people might try and make work in an extreme situation is not quite the same as just choosing to use something different. In any case, it is possible to get wine that has the same sort of alcohol content as juice, so it would make more sense to use that.
though it still raises questions about a common cup; not that the alcohol in wine is the biggest factor in its anti-bacterial properties, but still...
 
Upvote 0

PaladinValer

Traditional Orthodox Anglican
Apr 7, 2004
23,587
1,245
44
Myrtle Beach, SC
✟30,305.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I do know for a fact that a sisterhood in the Roman Catholic Church has developed ultra-low gluten wafers, which have a mere tiny fraction of the gluten of normal hosts.

Personally, I think we Anglicans should investigate it.

Otherwise, it is within dispensation limits to offer non-gluten hosts currently. Ask for them.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,797
21,028
Orlando, Florida
✟1,572,034.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I talked to the pastor privately and that went well, I think I am more at ease with receiving the Eucharist than I was. Gluten-free wafers are available also if I ask in advance.
 
Upvote 0