Third Temple Scam in modern Jerusalem?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Same boondoggle as BAB2. You and BAB2 are covenant theology and new covenant theology, and follow the opinions of them in those movements. And are products of committee think.
Some of us consider that as unity in the Spirit (which is what the community of His Church is all about).

That's how our historical Church began. Look at Luke's account in the Acts of the Apostles. One example I can point to is when Paul met with James and the Peter in Jerusalem for the sake of unity of the gospel and the Church:

Galatians 1:18-24

Unity is important for this reason:

Galatians 1:24
And they glorified God because of me.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,316
568
56
Mount Morris
✟124,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No....because that isn't a comparison of theology. For almost 1200 years the Church was in unity about this. The early church was adamant about seeking the Holy Spirit in order to have Truth to be their guide (that's how it was decided what were heresies and they were rejected). This was the belief of our apostolic early church. Covenants are the foundation of our faith.
This is not entirely true. They were democratic in their approach to what was taught. They voted a lot and the side with the most votes was held until the vote went the other way. You may want to read more on church theology.

That is until the orthodox and catholic church split. They no longer wanted to compromise and vote on the issues, so they separated ways.

After that heresy still crept in and even to the point those who held to the Bible, because they could read it for themselves, were martyred, because heresy is good for business, if ran by crooks. When the truth can lead to repentance and destroy the business set up by wicked men.

It was probably more complicated than the simplistic view I just posted, but the points and facts still remain.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,316
568
56
Mount Morris
✟124,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Christianity = covenant theology.

There was no other opposing view until the last few hundred years. Now.....christianity is all over the place.
Really? Christianity is a religion and man made. Covenant Theology is only one set of beliefs. They all fall under the man made view of the religion called Christianity. Covenant theology is just one flavor of this religion.

Now all covenant theology people may be part of the church, but not because of their theology. Each individual has their own relationship with God. Religion is just how they practice their faith. Many can practice their religion and not even know God. That is the sad part about religion.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,316
568
56
Mount Morris
✟124,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I said "confirmed". I know the meaning of "confirmed". You said "validated". Your word "validated" or its root "valid" appears nowhere in the entirety of Scripture.

Your claim that "The New Covenant will be validated in those who believe and accept it when the resurrection/rapture takes place." is disproven by Scripture below.

Hebrews 12
22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

I've grammatically (corroborated Scripturally and historically) proven that the prince who shall come is Messiah, and therefore that the everlasting covenant which He confirmed beginning with the Jews for seven years, is the New Covenant in His Blood.
The only problem is which Jews, cause it was not a general consensus historically.

Still say it was a 7 year period with Satan. 3.5 years happened at the first coming, 3.5 years at the second coming. Satan thought the Cross ended it, and it was over. WRONG! Satan was not the recipient of the covenant. It was the Adam redemption. Like Job, Satan had an arrangement concerning Adam's offspring. Remember until the Cross Satan had the power of death and sheol over OT believers. God showed up Himself to deal with Satan and confirm the covenant, and how it effected Adam's descendants.

Genesis 3:15 covenant:
15 "I will put animosity between you and the woman, and between your descendant and her descendant; he will bruise your head, and you will bruise his heel.”

7 Children, don’t let anyone deceive you — it is the person that keeps on doing what is right who is righteous, just as God is righteous.
8 The person who keeps on sinning is from the Adversary, because from the very beginning the Adversary has kept on sinning. It was for this very reason that the Son of God appeared, to destroy these doings of the Adversary.
9 No one who has God as his Father keeps on sinning, because the seed planted by God remains in him. That is, he cannot continue sinning, because he has God as his Father.
10 Here is how one can distinguish clearly between God’s children and those of the Adversary: everyone who does not continue doing what is right is not from God.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,316
568
56
Mount Morris
✟124,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
His life wasn't history. He was fully alive in heaven in 70 AD, directing the divine destruction of the nation of Israel which He had prophesied a generation earlier.
Why do you say divine? What Scriptural proof do you have?
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The only problem is which Jews, cause it was not a general consensus historically.

Still say it was a 7 year period with Satan. 3.5 years happened at the first coming, 3.5 years at the second coming. Satan thought the Cross ended it, and it was over. WRONG! Satan was not the recipient of the covenant. It was the Adam redemption. Like Job, Satan had an arrangement concerning Adam's offspring. Remember until the Cross Satan had the power of death and sheol over OT believers. God showed up Himself to deal with Satan and confirm the covenant, and how it effected Adam's descendants.

Genesis 3:15 covenant:
15 "I will put animosity between you and the woman, and between your descendant and her descendant; he will bruise your head, and you will bruise his heel.”

7 Children, don’t let anyone deceive you — it is the person that keeps on doing what is right who is righteous, just as God is righteous.
8 The person who keeps on sinning is from the Adversary, because from the very beginning the Adversary has kept on sinning. It was for this very reason that the Son of God appeared, to destroy these doings of the Adversary.
9 No one who has God as his Father keeps on sinning, because the seed planted by God remains in him. That is, he cannot continue sinning, because he has God as his Father.
10 Here is how one can distinguish clearly between God’s children and those of the Adversary: everyone who does not continue doing what is right is not from God.

Jews who believed on Him and accepted His New Covenant.
 
Upvote 0

George95

CF Tech Master
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Community Manager
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2012
17,329
1,725
29
✟1,395,553.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
mXruUXx.jpg

MOD HAT ON

As there has been issues with flaming others in this thread, Staff has decided to close the thread permanently.

MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.