• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

They won't build it! Hardhats vow not to work on controversial mosque

bricklayer

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2009
3,928
328
the rust belt
✟5,120.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
My sources are the words of Jesus and the words of mohammad.

Horrible things have been done, in the name of Christianity,
and in contrast to the nature of Christ.

Horrible things have been done, in the name of islam,
and in concert with the nature of mohammad.

I'm affraid that islam will revert back into what mohammad intended it to be, and has been for most of its history, a violently intolerent religion.

Just because it's called a religion does not equate it withh all other religions.
Iran is being run by a dooms-day cult.

How about those dooms-day nuts that gassed the Japaneese subway?
Do you want to give them equal footing?

Islam may well have morphed, over the centuries, into a tolerent and peaceful religion. I'll even go so far as to, for the sake of argument, and say it has.
My concern is that it will return to it "roots".

When I consider the life's work of Christ and compare it to the life's work of mohammad, it scares me. There's just no comparison. They do not equate.
 
Upvote 0

Yusuf Evans

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2005
10,057
611
Iraq
✟13,443.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
If they don't want to work on it--its their choice. Thank God they can make such a choice to not support a building they find goes against their religious beliefs. I would never willingly help build a mosque. I am sure no one would blame you for not wanting to build a church.

I agree, but at the same time, I wouldn't whine about not getting paid. No one has said they can't do that; we're saying they shouldn't expect to be paid anything(and I'm against them receiving unemployment benefits too).
 
Upvote 0

Yusuf Evans

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2005
10,057
611
Iraq
✟13,443.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
If you just shrugged your shoulders at the idea, THAT would show the power of the american people, to take a blow and walk away stronger and unafraid of the world regardless. Able to focus their attention on the things that truely matter.

Aren't Americans missing that attitude now. A sort of FU to the terrorists and being defiant? Aren't we supposed to have the biggest cojones of all the nations of the world?
 
Upvote 0

Billnew

Legend
Apr 23, 2004
21,246
1,234
60
Ohio
Visit site
✟50,363.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Ah, so constitutional rights can be trumped by ignorance and bigotry. How absolutely wonderful!
I figure this is probably a comon thought in this thread.

Currently over 8 pages of posts so I won't read them all.

1st: Everyone has the right to freedom of religion. No one said that people had to do business with the people of any religion. If everyone refuses to build, then the people still have their religion, and so do the people that refused. One persons religion does not mandate you do something for them. Would it be wrong for people to refuse to build a Christian church, for what ever reason they want to refuse?
All religions should be treated the same.
(oh, and yes, Christians would claim persectution, much the same that Muslims do. Woe is me and my religion, when everyone doesn't do exactly what I want.)

2nd: In our country today, there will be people that will come in and build it. Even if it is a country wide associations of Muslim workers. Greed will trump ideology. Even though the majority do not agree with this building, there will be enough people to construct it.

The people might not like it, but only goverment can stop this. They can slow it down and pus the cost way up, but it will be built unless goverment stops it.

The question here here is:
Does Goverment have the right to say that some plots of land should be restricted from building certain types of buildings based on the history of that land.
Not:
Does the goverment have the authority to prevent a religious building from being built.

It is the place they want to build it, not the building they want.
Well, some are ignorant and radical, and want no Muslim buildings anywhere, but they are the minority.

No place for celebrating the 9-11 tragedy, no Islamic victory center.
There is no reason to build a Islamic religious institute on ground zero, other then in celebration of 9-11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcswan
Upvote 0

Lockguy3000

Senior Member
Nov 14, 2007
1,075
62
NYC
✟24,055.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Being a New Yorker, and helped with the aftermath,
I secured a couple of buildings around ground zero.
I used to do the locks for a couple of stores in the towers mall.
Plus I used to do the locks for Port Authority before the first attack.
Which was located in the underground garage.

I lost a couple of friends down there,
a couple of fellow locksmiths as well.

I have no problem with this mosque being built where it is.

The real slap in the face is the time it has been
taking to rebuild the site.

NYC has built two baseball stadiums,
And I really don't see why they couldn't
had rebuilt the towers the same as before.

Everyday, I pass by the site,
driving on the BQE looking across the east river,
seeing the Battery, but no towers.

As every anniversary,
I shall be there to mourn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

Beechwell

Glücksdrache
Sep 2, 2009
768
23
Göttingen
✟23,677.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
I'm puzzled why you think I'm not distinguishing between legal and moral.
Then let me ask you this way: Disregarding their legal right to strike and speak (which I agree they may exercise) for the moment, do you agree with the workers' refusal to build the mosque? Do you think it is the right thing to do under these circumstances?


My sources are the words of Jesus and the words of mohammad.
[...]
When I consider the life's work of Christ and compare it to the life's work of mohammad, it scares me. There's just no comparison. They do not equate.
How you read the words of Mohammed is hardly relevant to the religion of Islam. What is relevant is how muslims read them. And many (I'd even dare say most) favor a peaceful reading of those words, even a tolerant one (at least no less tolerant than how many Christians read their bible).
Your post suggest to me (correct me if I'm wrong) that you only studied the Koran on your own, or even only read bits and pieces of it. I don't think that is the best way to learn the "truth" about a religion that relies very much on the interpretation and discussion of its fundamental texts by relgious scholars.
If you fear that Islam may revert to some hostile and intolerant state, maybe the best way to combat that possibility would be to support moderate groups with a peaceful and tolerant understanding of their religion, rather than fanning hostility between the religions.
Opposing the building of a mosque for moderate American muslims (and to all my knowledge the group behind the proposed mosque qualify as such) and practically identifying them with those responsible for 9/11 is certainly apt to create hostility and enstrangement.
 
Upvote 0

Lockguy3000

Senior Member
Nov 14, 2007
1,075
62
NYC
✟24,055.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The question here here is:
Does Goverment have the right to say that some plots of land should be restricted from building certain types of buildings based on the history of that land.
Not:
The landmark historical society,
can keep buildings from being built.

If they had claimed it as a landmark,
they can not do demolition,
and must renovate to the original image of the building,
inside and out.

The society did this to an old theater in Flushing Queens,
The RKO Keiths closed in the 80s, and since proclaimed as a historic landmark,
it has been boarded up,
and the site sticks out like a sore thumb.

The owners changed hands a couple times,
no one are able to build due to the cost
and a theater there is just not profitable,
the original plan was to be a shopping mall.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,526
20,374
Finger Lakes
✟324,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Does Goverment have the right to say that some plots of land should be restricted from building certain types of buildings based on the history of that land.
Construction was halted on a Federal building in lower Manhattan when the Negro Burial Grounds was unearthed, but only temporarily while the remains were excavated. There's a big old office building there now. If a place were to be on the National Register of Historic Places then it would be preserved. However, it would be highly unlikely that a building two blocks away from the actual site could be placed on it and not Ground Zero itself. There is nothing really sacred about an old retail store and nothing to distinguish this particular building from all the other buildings on the block. The only thing interesting about this site is that some people don't want a particular religious prayer room there.

It is the place they want to build it, not the building they want.
Well, some are ignorant and radical, and want no Muslim buildings anywhere, but they are the minority.
I hope so.

No place for celebrating the 9-11 tragedy, no Islamic victory center.
There is no reason to build a Islamic religious institute on ground zero, other then in celebration of 9-11.
Where to start...the community center is NOT a celebration of the 9-11 tragedy nor is it an Islamic victory center and it is not on Ground Zero (new commercial office buildings are slated for the actual Ground Zero).
 
Upvote 0

SOAD

Why do they always send the poor? (S.O.A.D.)
Jul 20, 2006
6,317
230
✟7,778.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
There is nothing really sacred about an old retail store and nothing to distinguish this particular building from all the other buildings on the block. The only thing interesting about this site is that some people don't want a particular religious prayer room there.

A piece of one of the planes fell through the roof of this building. This is the reason they will use to attempt to acheive historical status.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,526
20,374
Finger Lakes
✟324,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
A piece of one of the planes fell through the roof of this building. This is the reason they will use to attempt to acheive historical status.
:doh: That's pretty specious. It's ironic that a community center with a prayer room is considered "indecent" but a strip club is not.
 
Upvote 0

SOAD

Why do they always send the poor? (S.O.A.D.)
Jul 20, 2006
6,317
230
✟7,778.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
:doh: That's pretty specious. It's ironic that a community center with a prayer room is considered "indecent" but a strip club is not.
Now if the muslim community center offered a strip club, then it just might be ok. :)
 
Upvote 0
Z

ZephyrWiccan

Guest
A piece of one of the planes fell through the roof of this building. This is the reason they will use to attempt to acheive historical status.

They already did. The committee decided that that did not in any way make it a historical site and denied the movement to declare it a historic site. That line of trying to stop it is gone - it's not historic or considered historic.
 
Upvote 0

Billnew

Legend
Apr 23, 2004
21,246
1,234
60
Ohio
Visit site
✟50,363.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
1 Then let me ask you this way: Disregarding their legal right to strike and speak (which I agree they may exercise) for the moment, do you agree with the workers' refusal to build the mosque? Do you think it is the right thing to do under these circumstances?

2 Opposing the building of a mosque for moderate American muslims (and to all my knowledge the group behind the proposed mosque qualify as such) and practically identifying them with those responsible for 9/11 is certainly apt to create hostility and enstrangement.

p1: I believe they have the right to decide for themselves. If they find no one to do it, then it must be quite a majority of construction workers that think as I do. Bad place to build.

p2: moderate is in question. Identifying the religion of the attackers with the one they want to build the mosque links the 9-11 to the victory center. Even if the most moderate Muslims build it, the most extreme Muslims would consider it a pilgramage to pray at the Mosque on ground zero.

The landmark historical society,
can keep buildings from being built.

If they had claimed it as a landmark,
they can not do demolition,
and must renovate to the original image of the building,
inside and out.

The society did this to an old theater in Flushing Queens,
The RKO Keiths closed in the 80s, and since proclaimed as a historic landmark,
it has been boarded up,
and the site sticks out like a sore thumb.

The owners changed hands a couple times,
no one are able to build due to the cost
and a theater there is just not profitable,
the original plan was to be a shopping mall.
So it can be stopped if goverment/people want it too.
Currently goverment is not willing to act, even with the objections of the people.


1 Construction was halted on a Federal building in lower Manhattan when the Negro Burial Grounds was unearthed, but only temporarily while the remains were excavated. There's a big old office building there now. If a place were to be on the National Register of Historic Places then it would be preserved. 2 However, it would be highly unlikely that a building two blocks away from the actual site could be placed on it and not Ground Zero itself. There is nothing really sacred about an old retail store and nothing to distinguish this particular building from all the other buildings on the block. The only thing interesting about this site is that some people don't want a particular religious prayer room there.
p1: like someone else said Goverment can slow or stop building if they wanted too.
p2:Two blocks, you are the first to say how far away it is. two blocks?
The call to prayer will be heard by visitors of to ground zero.
hard for people not in New York to know how far we are talking. People say ground zero, while two blocks is not actually ground zero, it is still close.
prayer room? Prayer room, I thought it was a full scale Mosque, with several floors. Replacing a high rise with a small prayer room? Worth that much to this group? Worth the fight?
Thanks to another thread, I noticed that "American Muslim" There are at least 4 mosques in New York city area. 7 in NY state. (probably more, just in these pictures they identify NY man times) So its not that NY doesn't want a mosque, they just don't like the choice of sights.

I hope so.
I too.

Where to start...the community center is NOT a celebration of the 9-11 tragedy nor is it an Islamic victory center and it is not on Ground Zero (new commercial office buildings are slated for the actual Ground Zero)
That is what supporters of the building say, but what the people building plan to do with it could be a different story. Even if everything goes as planned, there would still be the people coming to pray in victory of 9-11.
When they dance in celebration on 9-11 in this mosque, who will stop them?

Maybe they should look somewhere debris from 9-11 didn't fall. Where the bodys of injured weren't laid for transport. Where survivors fled the collapse.

I do not see why a group would want to build a religious building in the face of the people that survived the attack. Supporters say we're linking all muslims together if we oppose this mosque. Opposers say that ground zero is a place that should be kept as a memorial to those that died and the heroic actions of those that helped people survive. To build a temple of the religion of the attackers would be desecrating the sight. For people mourning the loss of life and tradgedy, to hear a call to prayer of the attackers religion would be the ultimate victory for the attackers.

The only reason to build near 9-11 is for a victory center or as a Muslim
travesty. I do not think they would build a place to worship in a religious tradgedy.
How far away?
maybe 4 blocks or farther.

I doubt very much this was just a coincidence. That they never even thought of 9-11 when they bought the land.
I still support them building anywhere else in New York or in almost any place in the USA. Just not on/near sights where the most evil of their religion murdered hundreds/thousands of people.

Strip club: as far as I know, no stripper was a part of the conspiracy. There were a couple people of some religion on the planes, and involved in the planning.

It is sad they have not rebuilt on the actual sight. That in itself is a disgrace. We need to build it back and show that we will overcome what they(terrorists) do to us. Of course, I do not know if New York could use another high rise in the current economical conditions. Better not to rebuild a vacant building with no purpose.
 
Upvote 0
Z

ZephyrWiccan

Guest
p2:Two blocks, you are the first to say how far away it is. two blocks?
The call to prayer will be heard by visitors of to ground zero.
No, it will not.
hard for people not in New York to know how far we are talking. People say ground zero, while two blocks is not actually ground zero, it is still close.
There is a mosque 4 blocks from Ground Zero, which has been there since before Ground Zero was constructed.
prayer room?
Yes, Prayer room.
Prayer room, I thought it was a full scale Mosque, with several floors.
You thought wrong. Perhaps you should get better informed sources or more reliable sources. The building will be a tall community center with various open rooms, a swimming pool, exercise room, etc. The top two floors (IIRC it was the top ones)will be a prayer space dedicated to Muslims, and a prayer space for people of any faith.
Replacing a high rise with a small prayer room? Worth that much to this group? Worth the fight?
See above.
 
Upvote 0

TheDag

I don't like titles
Jan 8, 2005
9,459
267
✟36,294.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
My sources are the words of Jesus and the words of mohammad.

Horrible things have been done, in the name of Christianity,
and in contrast to the nature of Christ.

Horrible things have been done, in the name of islam,
and in concert with the nature of mohammad.

I'm affraid that islam will revert back into what mohammad intended it to be, and has been for most of its history, a violently intolerent religion.

Just because it's called a religion does not equate it withh all other religions.
Iran is being run by a dooms-day cult.

How about those dooms-day nuts that gassed the Japaneese subway?
Do you want to give them equal footing?

Islam may well have morphed, over the centuries, into a tolerent and peaceful religion. I'll even go so far as to, for the sake of argument, and say it has.
My concern is that it will return to it "roots".

When I consider the life's work of Christ and compare it to the life's work of mohammad, it scares me. There's just no comparison. They do not equate.
your using different standards to compare the two here.
 
Upvote 0

Drekkan85

Immortal until proven otherwise
Dec 9, 2008
2,274
225
Japan
✟38,051.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Liberals
Indeed - the only reason for opposition to the Community center is pure xenophobia.

Or idiocy.

I mean, you'd have to be pretty low-brow to NOT be able to see that Islam isn't monolithic. That said, this is the same nation that propped up dictatorial leaders that terrorized their own populations because they couldn't see "Communism" wasn't monolithic...
 
Upvote 0