They turned over a 150 year old evolutionary theory?

[AV1611VET]

Again, I'll say: Which you shouldn't because he's right when he says that it's 'correct', in that this finding explains more about evolution than we had before.

You're entitled to your opinion.

Or do just want some fish and chips to go with all that salt?

Arthur Treacher's?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You're entitled to your opinion.

It's not an opinion, it's fact.

Arthur Treacher's?

Not the first time you've brought them up.

 

[Larniavc]

They knew they were wrong all this time?

No. They suspected. That led to further study.

 

[AV1611VET]

No. They suspected. That led to further study.

Well, I applaud their tenacity.

Researching lampreys for 150 years finally paid off, didn't it?

 

[Larniavc]

Well, I applaud their tenacity.

Researching lampreys for 150 years finally paid off, didn't it?

What’s this about 150 years? Is that when you think the research was first carried out?

 

[AV1611VET]

What’s this about 150 years?

Read the title.

Is that when you think the research was first carried out?

Yes.

 

[Larniavc]

Read the title.



Yes.

I was replying to your post about 150 year old lamprey research. The lamprey hypotheses is not nearly 150 years old.

 

[Shemjaza]

Evolution is a theory in crisis.

Simply False.

Evolution is a scientific theory derived from multiple lines of evidence in the physical world.

If you are right and all the evolution accepting people are wrong due to undetected miracles then it is a false conclusion... but given the presented evidence, the theory of evolution is not in crisis.


Don't fall for presenting Intelligent Design lies just because they share the same conclusion about the how and who created life.

 

[AV1611VET]

Don't fall for presenting Intelligent Design lies just because they share the same conclusion about the how and who created life.

I don't.

Intelligent Design can take a hike.

Cdesign Proponentsists got what they deserved.

 

[Frank Robert]

Isn't it great?

And done with a 360 million year old fossils

 

[Astrid]

These fossilized lamprey hatchlings disprove an age-old evolutionary theory

Lampreys have long been thought to be the earliest vertebrates. But new fossils of hatchling lampreys suggest that theory is completely wrong.

www.popsci.com

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03305-9.epdf?sharing_token=3bQ4JwIcBkXj9GyibCX3JdRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0Mx1hzGP9sO7xoFR2EvQJmc227O6czJmrLC85L5IIh98g1YwzmIl-u9Lpq9opvm_B8YaV2AHED9zIAiMmT8oIdFw8wm2sV4UFQGmrQBqi2b54jtFke3trQNL4oEhpBIohyoC4oHOz7C0MU_hidFs6QpoocN29HO4BbXoQadOdJnYH6YGOvjtFk1YNz7_LcNPcs%3D&tracking_referrer=www.popsci.com

Nobody thought lampreys were the earliest vertebrates.
So that's a bad start.