- Jan 26, 2007
- 42,345
- 21,028
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
yeppersIndeed, sin is not specific to one ethnicity.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
yeppersIndeed, sin is not specific to one ethnicity.
Patriarch Bartholomew is the seniormost bishop in the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. Archbishop Elpidophorus is the archbishop of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese in North America, which is part of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
Patriarch higher and bishop lower?
only in terms of honor and history, not of authority. the first place of Constantinople is within the bishopric, and not above his brother bishops.Patriarch higher and bishop lower?
Not surprised.I think there IS a problem specific to the US about the Greek Church in the US, money, and its special influence.
I know that my mother encountered a Greek parish in CA where money decided an awful lot, and the worldliness and prioritizing of promoting Greek culture (for $$$) over promoting the Gospel to Americans was a factor in her turning to Islam in the last years of her life.
Its an aside, but I strongly suspect that Greek money is part of what leads AF Ministries to pursue policies that they do and promote speakers that they shouldn’t.
only in terms of honor and history, not of authority. the first place of Constantinople is within the bishopric, and not above his brother bishops.
Yes, this is an unfortunate fact.I'd always be very cautious when accepting any prophecy without a clear statement of who said it and where/when they said it. There are too many prophecies that seem to be made up later and then put into the mouths of some earlier person.
By the way with regards to the political disturbances in the church, please pray for the bishops and pray for unity. There are enough schisms already; we don’t need these new schisms that have emerged in the past decade among the canonical churches. When I first joined the Orthodox Church there were no schisms between the major canonical jurisdictions, which lead to remarks of a predictable nature among Old Calendarists about “World Orthodoxy” and ecumenism, in particular, ROCOR having reunited with the MP was an issue I inadvertently got caught up in when I made the mistake of attending a parish that had been ROCOR, that had broken away and joined an Old Calendarists jurisdiction after the reunification in 2007 but had somehow managed to retain the beautiful building, and this lead to some awkwardness.
That all sounds very complicated and my tiny brain cannot make sense of it all.
At least in terms of seniority and precedence, and perhaps in the Church of Constantinople, actual authority. As a general rule however all Orthodox bishops are equal and in most jurisdictions the Patriarch cannot, for example, intrude in the diocese of a brother bishop, being first among equals and not first without equals. Part of the controversy with Archbishop Elpidophorus is that when he was Metropolitan of Bursa, he published a paper stating that the Ecumenical Patriarch was first without equals and had certain powers which as far as I can tell the EP actually does not have; the only powers the EP has in theory that other Orthodox bishops might lack is the ability to hear appeals under Canon XXVIII of Chalcedon, although in that respect, when the Church of Antioch petitioned him due to concerns that the Church of Jerusalem was infringing on their ecclesiastical territory as guaranteed by the ancient canons, such as Canons 6 and 7 of Nicaea, the Ecumenical Patriarch did not do anything, which resulted in Antioch suspending full communion with the EP (although they are still indirectly in communion by virtue of being in communion with other Orthodox churches which in turn are in communion with the EP). Likewise, before the tragedy in the Ukraine began, the Moscow Patriarchate broke communion with the EP due to the EP’s involvement in setting up the Orthodox Church in Ukraine in opposition to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Metropolitan Onuphrius, who is under the Moscow Patriarchate.
Apologies. I thought I quoted this:
Forgive me. What I was saying is that we do not want these new schisms in the church, so please pray for the unity of the Orthodox bishops.
I was also saying that when I joined the Orthodox Church, these schisms had not yet formed, and their formation has been distressing.
AMEN!Personally, I found myself repelled by all the protestant individualism in the Church first by the leftist “progressive” believers with their faux “living Tradition”, and then by the radical conservatives ready to identify the Church with Stalinism and/or Sergianism, elevating national concerns to BE the concerns of the Church, and to punish dissent with that. It is a small miracle that I have not walked away from the Church altogether. Now my hope is that some of the faithful will remain faithful, that I will see others ready to accept our ancient Tradition and not seek to “correct” it.
I am in full agreement here for the need for unity. As the Western World rips apart its moral fiber it would help if we Orthodox could ever speak with one voice against it. But, how can we be taken seriously when we have overlapping jurisdictions all over the place and can barely keep our own house in order?By the way with regards to the political disturbances in the church, please pray for the bishops and pray for unity. There are enough schisms already; we don’t need these new schisms that have emerged in the past decade among the canonical churches. When I first joined the Orthodox Church there were no schisms between the major canonical jurisdictions, which lead to remarks of a predictable nature among Old Calendarists about “World Orthodoxy” and ecumenism, in particular, ROCOR having reunited with the MP was an issue I inadvertently got caught up in when I made the mistake of attending a parish that had been ROCOR, that had broken away and joined an Old Calendarists jurisdiction after the reunification in 2007 but had somehow managed to retain the beautiful building, and this lead to some awkwardness.
Adding to this, in spite of the erroneous reporting by American and European media, the Ecumenical Patriarch is NOT the head of the Orthodox Church. He is not an "Orthodox Pope" no matter how much he is trying to make himself one.only in terms of honor and history, not of authority. the first place of Constantinople is within the bishopric, and not above his brother bishops.
and will never be oneAdding to this, in spite of the erroneous reporting by American and European media, the Ecumenical Patriarch is NOT the head of the Orthodox Church. He is not an "Orthodox Pope" no matter how much he is trying to make himself one.
I don’t remember, but I will say there will be no downfall of the Orthodox Church.If I was going to give a comment, if you would allow me, I do not know what the will of God is in this matter. I recall a thought I had when I had PMed @ArmyMatt about something that that would be the start of the downfall of the EO church. I do not have that thought anywhere documented.
I don’t remember, but I will say there will be no downfall of the Orthodox Church.
I just chimed in for any lurkers.Whatever the feeling was that I experiences, whether true or not, it was not due at all to anything you said. I just wanted to get that in the open so people don't get the wrong idea.