Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Good to know. This fits with the fact that the Apollo astro-nots were high level masons.
Sure.
Rob Skiba, Jeran Campanella, Mark Sargent, Bob Knodel and Robbie Davidson for starters.
Rob Skiba's story is very interesting and he is a strong Christian.
Eric Dubay is also one of the big names in the FE hall of fame too.
Good to know. This fits with the fact that the Apollo astro-nots were high level masons.
LOL. What he means is "Don't take my word for it. Go and do your own research. Test it for yourselves"Perhaps you shouldn't believe him if he tells you not to.
You aren't going to claim that a FE'er believes that space exists........are you?Sure it is! He is on a spaceship that is above the flat earth (the ultimate indicator that the photo is real) and he's using a camera to take a picture of himself next to the spaceship's window to prove that the earth is flat. You're not going to claim this to be fake, are you?
OK, so you have looked into it. Your posts don't reflect any confidence that you understand their concepts however. Maybe I'm wrong.I am familiar with the rhetoric of the first three persons you name. I'm not sure about the last two.
I've listened to several debates featuring Jeran, and he's not presented compelling arguments in any of them. His talking points are largely derived from the publication "200 Proofs Earth is not a Spinning Ball", which debunkers have been busy debunking over the years. Jeran has, largely, given up trying to prove a Flat Earth scenario, although he reserves the right to critique the globe earth model.
I've listened to Rob Skiba, who is more Christian in tone, but who ultimately uses the same (now refuted) arguments that Jeran uses ...
And I've heard a bit of Mark Sargent, who seems to me to be more of an organizer than an apologist.
And I think that Eric Dubay is the author of the now largely refutted "200 Proofs Earth is not a Spinning Ball" ...
Of the 18 men who went to the moon, (3) were Masons.
Buzz Aldrin
Edgar Mitchell
James Irwin
That, of course, leaves (15) who were not Masons
Neil Armstrong
Michael Collins
Charles "Pete" Conrad
Alan Bean
Richard "Dick" Gordon
Alan Shepard
Stuart Roosa
David Scott
Alfred Worden
John W. Young
Charles Duke
Thomas "Ken" Mattingly
Eugene Cernan
Harrison Schmidt
Ronald Evans
Exactly... and, to top it all off.. all the "rocket scientists" share their knowledge... People who think that due to the many different countries with space programs... it would be impossible to keep it quiet..Indeed. A secret as big as the deception given is easily kept by compartmentalization.
Most people - even with clearance - do not realize what is going on; the left hand never knows what the right hand is doing. That is always the best way to make sure a secret is kept, even if one party decided to spill alleged beans. Compartmentalization and public incredulity keep the secrets too big to be kept.
I may be wrong to use a blanket statement, such as "all astro NOts" but, from this article, looks more like 10 not three.
Masonic Astronauts
In the end.. NASA is driven by the masonic organization. It is deeply rooted in this as a controlling power.
It only takes a small amount of time to realize that they have all kept the Antarctic treaty for more than half a century.... to understand that they are working together underneath it all.
why it is painful to see such potential buy into things your eye, or a plane ride, for example, can confirm
Very interesting how Terra Firma as we know it, and Antarctica seem to work as two different worlds altogether.
A plane ride from, say, Sydney to Johannesburg will immediately prove the flat earth model wrong. See Qantas (QF) #63 ✈ FlightAware
So will watching a sunset.
So will watching the stars on a trip northwards or southwards.
Well, speaking as a citizen of the country that claims the biggest slice of Antarctica, not really.
This isn't speaking of Jesus disowning anyone. It speaks of someone leaving/betraying Jesus …
Well ... the sun still rises up over the eastern horizon ... and sets below the western horizon.
... so I am yet a globe-earther ...
- Change in stars with latitude
- Objects being hidden by the curve of the earth
- Measured distances (and aircraft flight times) between cities
- Need I go on?
As a result of gravity working this way, the gravitational force at the earth's surface on an object of mass m is:
F = 6.67408×10^-11 M m / r^2 = 9.8 m
where M is the mass of the earth, and r its radius.
Force = mass times acceleration, so:
F = m a = 9.8 m
Therefore a = 9.8. That is, ignoring air resistance, all falling objects close to the earth's surface accelerate at 9.8 metres per second per second, no matter how heavy they are.
I think you've got force, acceleration, and speed confused. They are three different things.
There are plenty of such debates on YouTube channel Non Sequitor. Proponents of the Flat Earth really don't fare well there ... because they really don't have anything to offer ... except a lack of understanding of the Globe model.
"where M is the mass of the earth, and r its radius."
LOL, .. this is a perfect example how the Germans at NASA were able to brainwash U.S. college kids who were first made to believe they are evolving mindless animals of the ape family while in kindergarten.
Really? I thought Force = acceleration = speed?
Now if gravity existed, the feather would have it's own pulling force on the earth, and the 8,000 times more massive bowling ball would have 8,000 times the g-force, or pulling-on-the-earth-force than the feather, now try adding numbers, not letters.
In letters, G is gravity, the feather has 'G' and the bowling ball has 'G', as well as your Globe has 'G'. So you and NASA can avoid using actual numbers, you add G+G+G=G and say: "See, they all have the same 'G', so they fall at the same rate, at 'G'!" .. LOL.
Lol, .. the sun setting over the horizon is a Flat Earther claim. In imaginary space, with the paper globe the sun is not the one rising or setting. So you are close, .. real close of becoming a FE'r all you need to do is be a free thinker, not let some billionaires who are in the; 'NASA rocket-flying-club' convince you otherwise, or else they'll mock you.
Really? I thought Force = acceleration = speed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?