Eudaimonist
I believe in life before death!
- Jan 1, 2003
- 27,482
- 2,738
- 58
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
So in other words, if a society doesn't fit your idea of what a perfect society is, then it can't be any good? Despite the fact that your knowledge and experience of societies is limited to what has historically existed on earth? That's awful narrow-minded.
No, it's dealing with the facts as we know them. We can't argue about imaginary facts.
I'm not God. All I know is that it would be better than anything humans could come up with by themselves.
How do you know that it would be better if you are not possessed of Godlike knowledge?
To human-mandated/enforced theocratic control, sure. But not for a God who genuinely knows what is best for us.
And what does God do with this knowledge of what is best for us?
When I conceptualize theocracy, either human or divine, I'm assuming that people will be compelled in some way to live according to a set of divine commandments.
You are free to suggest that a God who genuinely knows what is best for us would let human beings make their own decisions within the boundaries of individual rights, but that wouldn't be a theocracy in any sense that I would recognize. It would be more like a benevolent dictator who happens to like a libertarian social organization.
Define "free". A perfectly "free" society is anarchy, every man for himself.
I don't mean a lawless society in which one person may "legally" act in such a way as to forcibly interfere with the freedom of someone else. I mean a libertarian society in which there are carefully defined individual rights that grant to each individual a personal domain of legal authority in decision-making. For example, if you own a house, you may decide how to decorate your house. That is your domain of decision-making because it is your property and falls under your individual rights.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Upvote
0