• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Theists and Atheists working together?

PostTribber

Regular Member
Jul 14, 2007
3,378
37
Woodland, CA
✟18,710.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
"As long as religion doesn't impact other people's lives, I'm willing to make a truce and realize that religion serves its purpose just as atheism does." ... Atheism is a religion!
"This means no legislation inspired by the bible, koran, torah, whatever. The reason for this is that often times what's best for human beings, as I've stated above, conflicts with people's beliefs." ... Atheism is a belief! ... seems we want everything decided according to an 'atheistic' viewpoint. that's just results in more hell on earth. :mad:
 
Upvote 0

GreenMunchkin

Likes things. And stuff. But mostly things.
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2007
20,385
7,476
46
United Kingdom of wo0t
✟122,441.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
[/color]

You have as much evidence to justify your belief as any extremist muslim does.....which is no evidence whatsoever. You reference your bible and your "heart and feelings" to justify your belief, which is exactly what anyone can do to justify their belief. There is no difference in the evidence you have for your belief and the evidence that extremeist muslims have.
Well, my having witnessed first-hand two unequivocal miracles is slightly more than a "heart and feelings" issue. There's also a series of videos called Transformations which have documented miracles from the four corners of the Earth.

Non-Christians often then debate whether that means the miracle *actually* happened, and the simple answer is yes. You don't need to have witnessed it for it to be true, and unless this is to become a debate about the nature of reality, and existentialism, miracles DO happen. That's fact.


My morality comes from using my brain to figure out that if I hope to be treated well by others....I should probably treat others well. No bible involved, it's just common sense. People have led moral lives without the bible for centuries, and they will as long as human beings walk the earth.
But people still had God. Are you saying morality is intrinsic in all people to the same degree? Is morality created by some sort of societal critical mass?

Straw man argument.

People that kill for religion kill in the name of their religion, but the people you listed above did not kill in the name of atheism. I don't know how else to say it to christians that atheism is not a belief. If you say that you don't believe in unicorns, that makes you an aunicornist. Does that mean I can tell anything else about you other than that you don't believe in unicorns? No. The people you listed above were power hugry jerks, religious or no, and it had nothing to do with atheism. If you want to bring up people that have killed millions in the name of religion, we can start another thread if you wish.
Of course atheism is a belief, and it's just a question of semantics how you make it sound. It's the belief that there is no God. And it only a belief as you can't prove a negative.

But, no, it's not a strawman argument. Take Hitler, for example. There he was, reading Nietzsche's books - which stated God didn't exist. In fact, he was the first to say "God is dead". Hitler drank it all in and introduced Mussolini to his writings.

So Nietzsche's saying God is dead, in which case there's no reason to behave as if He does. You may as well do what you want because there's no moral arbiter, anymore. This is a quote of Hitler's: "I freed Germany from the stupid and degrading fallacies of conscience and morality... "

His belief that there was no God allowed him to believe morality was now moot, and that's what gave him "permission" in his eyes to do what he did.

But your version of "trying" involves converting everyone to your set of beliefs, which is wrong.
:scratch: Did I actually say that, dude?

My compromise is to let everyone continue to believe what they choose, but to not interfere with anyone else's lives. Your set of unproven beliefs cannot dictate how someone else lives their life.
They're not unproven. There is more than enough evidence to support the veracity of Jesus, and God.

How do you suggest we remove Christianity's influence on society? Scratch our laws? Alter what we class as years? Decide it's no longer 2007?

How do you see that actually working?
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Well, my having witnessed first-hand two unequivocal miracles is slightly more than a "heart and feelings" issue. There's also a series of videos called Transformations which have documented miracles from the four corners of the Earth.


I'm sure primitive man thought fire was miraculous as well. My point is that just because someone is ignorant of science, how things work, and what's scientifically possible, doesn't mean what they see is miraculous. They just currently don't know how what they saw was possible.

Non-Christians often then debate whether that means the miracle *actually* happened, and the simple answer is yes. You don't need to have witnessed it for it to be true, and unless this is to become a debate about the nature of reality, and existentialism, miracles DO happen. That's fact.

No, it's not fact. There have been no documented cases of miracles that have been openly accepted by society, only christians. Just because your perception of an event is miraculous (like someone being revived from near death), doesn't mean there isn't a reasonable explanation for it.

But people still had God. Are you saying morality is intrinsic in all people to the same degree? Is morality created by some sort of societal critical mass?

No, I am saying that it makes sense for everyone not to freely kill people because that would threaten our survival as a species. I have no urge to kill, steal, rape, etc, anyway, but it makes sense to me not to do these things because it would destroy society. God has nothing to do with that.

Of course atheism is a belief, and it's just a question of semantics how you make it sound. It's the belief that there is no God. And it only a belief as you can't prove a negative.

Theists like to play this semantic game just so they can say that atheism is a religion as well. You can't be further from the truth. Even if i admit that it is a belief, the only thing you can know for sure about this belief is that we don't believe in god. That's it. You can't say that we are immoral, hedonistic, evil, cruel, etc.

For example, what if I all the sudden started believing in pink unicorns and I told you about this belief. You would then become an apinkunicornist. That is now your belief, that you do not believe in pink unicorns. Can I tell anything else about you from this belief other than that you don't believe in pink unicorns? No. Well that's exactly what "atheism" is. I wouldn't even be an atheist if you hadn't told me about your belief in god.

Why should I have to automatically have a belief and a label every time someone else comes up with a new off the wall belief? I am a human being and that's all. Period.

But, no, it's not a strawman argument. Take Hitler, for example. There he was, reading Nietzsche's books - which stated God didn't exist. In fact, he was the first to say "God is dead". Hitler drank it all in and introduced Mussolini to his writings.
So Nietzsche's saying God is dead, in which case there's no reason to behave as if He does. You may as well do what you want because there's no moral arbiter, anymore. This is a quote of Hitler's: "I freed Germany from the stupid and degrading fallacies of conscience and morality... "

His belief that there was no God allowed him to believe morality was now moot, and that's what gave him "permission" in his eyes to do what he did.


His lack of belief in god may have influenced the justification of what he did but Hitler killed more out of racism than religion. He did not kill in the name of a god. He killed out of hatred for other human beings not like himself.

They're not unproven. There is more than enough evidence to support the veracity of Jesus, and God.

If there is so much evidence to prove god's existence, then where does all this "faith" come in? I thought the whole reason you need faith was because there was no evidence and now you're telling me there's overwhelming evidence and that atheists and non-christians around the world are just ignoring this evidence?

If you believe because of evidence, that's not faith, that's just being an intelligent human being. Faith comes in when there is no evidence. So which is it, do you have faith or do you believe because of the evidence?

How do you suggest we remove Christianity's influence on society? Scratch our laws? Alter what we class as years? Decide it's no longer 2007?
How do you see that actually working?

I see it working by simply not pushing your belief on others.
 
Upvote 0

Key

The Opener of Locks
Apr 10, 2004
1,946
177
Visit site
✟26,507.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
[/color]You have as much evidence to justify your belief as any extremist muslim does.....which is no evidence whatsoever.


This is a strawman. We have as much evidence as you do about your own beliefs, now you may say that Atheism is not a belief, but it is, is might not be a "Religion" but it is the Belief that there is no God (or gods), it is a creed, with it's own dogmas, and ideals. As such, you have as much evidence as everyone else to your claim or belief, yet you hold to it.. the question is.. why?

You reference your bible and your "heart and feelings" to justify your belief, which is exactly what anyone can do to justify their belief.

I'll agree to that.

There is no difference in the evidence you have for your belief and the evidence that extremeist muslims have.

Again, or that you have, or that anyone has, when it comes to a belief, creed, or dogma.

The difference is, I have a lot of evidence that the lessons taught in the bible have stood for 2000 years, and yet no one has been able to improve upon them. despite their best efforts.

Also, I could offer you insight into the divinity of the lessons taught in the bible, and how it applies, that these lessons, even after 2000 years, still hold strong as a good moral guide, and still are the best way to live a life and have positive cultural interaction.

The advantages, and the rules as they affect the positive of a culture are evidence in and of themselves, so it is a bit more then just simple "I believe" because, I have seen what Jesus taught, and given application, and seeing what happens when they are not followed, I have a study done, that involved everyone in the world. I would for the past 2000 years, and I would have to say, that is quite an extensive test, that supports that this "belief" is still the best there is.

My morality comes from using my brain to figure out that if I hope to be treated well by others....I should probably treat others well.

Which is a byproduct of your cultural influence, and I might add is the pinnacle of the Christian faith. You see, you only will ever have, what you have to work with, and what you have to work with is what you have been influenced by, and exposed to. Thus, you may very well be intelligent, and well informed, but that is still all you have to work with, the limited data you have gathered as an individual, living in the culture you have, with it's limited confines. And Given what you have put forth, you are hopelessly influenced by the Christian faith, and it's ideals of morality. In a sense, you are following the teachings of Jesus, you just do not realize them as such, again, this is a product of your culture and it's influence upon you, molding your very thinking patterns, to have you believe what the culture as a whole believes, regardless of your acceptance of a God or gods.

No bible involved, it's just common sense.

It's common sense, as per the culture you live in, with it's already established ideals of what is immoral and what is moral, this culture was built on the Christian faith of what is moral and immoral, as such, even if you yourself are not a Christian, you will and shall forever be a product of it's moral codes, because the culture itself is a product of it;s moral codes, regardless of how twisted or distorted they become as time and sin influence them. The foundation is there.

People have led moral lives without the bible for centuries, and they will as long as human beings walk the earth.

We think, see, the Scriptures establish what is Moral and Immoral, with out them, anyone could say something is immoral or moral and do it, and say that are living a moral life.

For example, killing children with abnormalities was moral, as per the Greek culture, there was no sin or wrong in doing this, as it was a necessity of the culture and the time. As such, we cold say, in a way, that everyone had lived morally good, if they followed what their culture taught, just as "vikings" believed that Valhalla was only for those that died going down fighting, thus killing, and dieing were a positive thing in their lives. Now, the difference between you and I, is that I am no longer influenced by my culture, as I once was, I am guided by my God, and if the culture I live in, and my God disagree, then I choose what my God has set forth, you on the other had, have no standard to set, other then the one your culture has provided to you. Yes, I know you will disagree, but if you do, what other form of moral development do you have , other then your cultural influence?

People that kill for religion kill in the name of their religion, but the people you listed above did not kill in the name of atheism.

Yes they do, they Kill in the name of what they have been told to kill in, IE: We must destroy the Religious as they are a plague upon this earth, was what Stalin taught, so are they currently doing in China, they are killing in the name of Atheism, to destroy the religions, to make a purity of science, or a purity of obeidence to the country and it's codes, not to any "god or gods" as such, this is directly killing in the name of Atheism. People will kill.. and destroy.. in the name of any Creed, or Ideal, Religion, or against religion, for race, or even simple ideals of where they were are born. People are sheep being lead to the slaughter by charismatic leaders that can twist their minds, and set them on a course of destruction, this is how it has always been, and how it will continue to be, until the day we remove ourselves from such Human control, and place ourselves in the hands of God and God alone.

I don't know how else to say it to christians that atheism is not a belief. If you say that you don't believe in unicorns, that makes you an aunicornist.

True, and at the same Time, I am an Antiunicornist, just I do not BELIEVE in Goblins, Trolls and many other things, but it is a Belief that they do not exist, it is nothing other then a Belief, or a Creed, or a personal Dogma on my part that they are not real, it may not be a "religion" but it is a personal creed or belief.

You BELIEVE that there are no gods.

Does that mean I can tell anything else about you other than that you don't believe in unicorns? No. The people you listed above were power hugry jerks, religious or no, and it had nothing to do with atheism.

Just the same with many Religious leaders, it has nothing to do with Religion, and everything to do with power and control. If you can grasp one side of the fence, why not the other?

If you want to bring up people that have killed millions in the name of religion, we can start another thread if you wish.

Well we could, but it would be a short list, better list would be, say, people that have killed to further their own personal agendas, and goals, and used a "religion" because it was a tool of great persuasion. Now that would be a long list... very long list.

But at the same time, the list of people that have killed simply for power and control is a long list as well, and nothing is a better tool then to have people believe that what they are doing will ensure their place in "heaven" because that boots moral, and induces a level of frantically loyalty of your pawns.

But, people that know the Religion will speak out, and try to stop the abuse. Again, which makes it seem why the church is always at ends with the church.

But your version of "trying" involves converting everyone to your set of beliefs, which is wrong.

I explain my religion, if you believe, fine, if you don't, fine. It's your choice.

However, some of the moral codes that have came from the Scriptures are not only biblical, but a necessity of peaceful coexistence for all parties involved.

A good example, "Treat others as you would like to be treated", or "Don't Kill each other", don't steal, don't rape, etc.

These are all very powerful and proper moral guidelines for a peaceful civilization to have mutual and open coexistence.

Out of Time.. But.. I hope I have given you food for thought, and something to think about...

And Jesus does not teach that we are supposed to ram our religion don your throat, but we do need to have a means where we have a "safe" society, and that can only come about, if people are expected to follow cultural and civil moral codes for interaction.

God Bless

Key
 
Upvote 0

GreenMunchkin

Likes things. And stuff. But mostly things.
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2007
20,385
7,476
46
United Kingdom of wo0t
✟122,441.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sure primitive man thought fire was miraculous as well. My point is that just because someone is ignorant of science, how things work, and what's scientifically possible, doesn't mean what they see is miraculous. They just currently don't know how what they saw was possible.
Do you need to assume I'm ignorant scientifically to disprove my point? What if it turns out I'm not ignorant?


No, it's not fact. There have been no documented cases of miracles that have been openly accepted by society, only christians. Just because your perception of an event is miraculous (like someone being revived from near death), doesn't mean there isn't a reasonable explanation for it.
Get a hold of the videos. Honestly. Why does society at large need to accept it? And what is society other than people? Some people believe, as they've witnessed miracles; most, like yourself, aren't willing to find out if it's *really* true. Tell me something, honestly, k? If you were to see these miracles - and there is simply no other explanation - would you then re-think your position, or would you still refuse to believe?


No, I am saying that it makes sense for everyone not to freely kill people because that would threaten our survival as a species. I have no urge to kill, steal, rape, etc, anyway, but it makes sense to me not to do these things because it would destroy society. God has nothing to do with that.
But who says? And what about the thousands of people that do kill, steal and rape? For them, it's common sense, and they don't see it as wrong. In fact, they feel pretty good about it. But it's evil, right? And it's evil regardless of whether we think so or not. So for the people who see it's evil, what tells them that?

Put it this way: The only way you'd know a line was crooked was if you'd previously seen a straight one. And our repulsion at murder and rape is a clue that we're comparing those crooked acts to a straight one. Where does that come from? Seeing as this "law" exists, the chances are there's a law-giver.


Theists like to play this semantic game just so they can say that atheism is a religion as well. You can't be further from the truth. Even if i admit that it is a belief, the only thing you can know for sure about this belief is that we don't believe in god. That's it. You can't say that we are immoral, hedonistic, evil, cruel, etc.
Gosh, and nor would I. I'm not sure where that came from...

But, see, God is real, so your belief that He doesn't exist *is* a belief akin to religion. How is it any different?

For example, what if I all the sudden started believing in pink unicorns and I told you about this belief. You would then become an apinkunicornist. That is now your belief, that you do not believe in pink unicorns. Can I tell anything else about you from this belief other than that you don't believe in pink unicorns? No. Well that's exactly what "atheism" is. I wouldn't even be an atheist if you hadn't told me about your belief in god.
You seem to feel Christians "tar" all atheists with the same brush... why is that? It's like you're expecting an attack. That won't happen, dude. Seriously.

But that's not entirely true. If you're so convinced God simply doesn't exist, why label yourself anything, at all? If you don't believe something exists, you don't label yourself in protest; you just don't pay it any mind.

Why should I have to automatically have a belief and a label every time someone else comes up with a new off the wall belief? I am a human being and that's all. Period.
How many labels have you adopted due to newfangled beliefs?


His lack of belief in god may have influenced the justification of what he did but Hitler killed more out of racism than religion. He did not kill in the name of a god. He killed out of hatred for other human beings not like himself.
No, no, read that quote again. His belief that God was dead meant he felt he was free to commit whatever atrocities he wanted. His racism was a seed; his fundamental militant atheism is what allowed him to do it and gave him the impetus to do it.

And the point is, no, he didn't do it in the name of some atheist god, but the issue is whether the world would be any better were atheism the main value system, and this shows, along with Key's casual sex example, that atheism does not equal a better society.


If there is so much evidence to prove god's existence, then where does all this "faith" come in? I thought the whole reason you need faith was because there was no evidence and now you're telling me there's overwhelming evidence and that atheists and non-christians around the world are just ignoring this evidence?
Many don't want to see it. But my relationship with Jesus is based partly on faith, that He died for me, and that He loves me and that I will spend eternity with Him... and partly based on evidence, which affords me the ability to have complete and utter faith in Him, and in who He says He is.

If you believe because of evidence, that's not faith, that's just being an intelligent human being. Faith comes in when there is no evidence. So which is it, do you have faith or do you believe because of the evidence?
Both. They aren't mutually exclusive, at all.

I see it working by simply not pushing your belief on others.
How's that being done here?
 
Upvote 0

HypnoToad

*croak*
Site Supporter
May 29, 2005
5,876
485
✟104,802.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Actually, it does have a bearing on what you do if they kill you or your family.
No, Christ never said, "spread the Gospel, unless they threaten you, then just cowardly roll over for them."

Don't you think you should concern yourself with trying to prevent that?
Sure we should try to stop murders. But I fail to see how that overrides Christ's command to spread the Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Which is a byproduct of your cultural influence, and I might add is the pinnacle of the Christian faith. You see, you only will ever have, what you have to work with, and what you have to work with is what you have been influenced by, and exposed to. Thus, you may very well be intelligent, and well informed, but that is still all you have to work with, the limited data you have gathered as an individual, living in the culture you have, with it's limited confines. And Given what you have put forth, you are hopelessly influenced by the Christian faith, and it's ideals of morality. In a sense, you are following the teachings of Jesus, you just do not realize them as such, again, this is a product of your culture and it's influence upon you, molding your very thinking patterns, to have you believe what the culture as a whole believes, regardless of your acceptance of a God or gods.

How fair is this? The fact that I'm moral is due all to christianity's influence on me? But if I were evil, it would be because of the devil or because I don't accept god?

That's pretty cheap of christianity to take credit for all that is good and pawn off all that's bad on everything else.
 
Upvote 0

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
39,044
9,489
✟420,938.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I personally don't see fetuses as humans until they reach a certain development stage. That stage for me is when they can live independently of their mother. If the fetus is a human, they would be able to live independently of their mother as (most of) us humans do. Just my 2 cents.
In the 1850's, many people still didn't see black slaves as people either.
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
This is a strawman. We have as much evidence as you do about your own beliefs, now you may say that Atheism is not a belief, but it is, is might not be a "Religion" but it is the Belief that there is no God (or gods), it is a creed, with it's own dogmas, and ideals. As such, you have as much evidence as everyone else to your claim or belief, yet you hold to it.. the question is.. why?

A strawman is a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted. I did not set up any arguments, but you have here by setting up that atheism is a belief with ideals, dogmas and creeds. This is no more true than aunicornists (you and I) having a set of beliefs just because we are aunicornists. Please tell me you understand this so we can stop assuming that atheism is some sort of belief system that has some sort of set of rules that we all follow.

We are all aunicornists (I hope). The only thing that aunicornists have in common is that we all don't believe in unicorns. You can't extract any other information from that label than that we don't believe in unicorns. Please tell me you understand this.

You are atheist to all other gods as well, so I don't know why it's so hard for you all to grasp that atheism is simply a lack of belief in the concept of god....that's it. You can't tell anything else about us. We don't share any other creeds, ideals, or anything else. Got it?

We think, see, the Scriptures establish what is Moral and Immoral, with out them, anyone could say something is immoral or moral and do it, and say that are living a moral life.

Here's where I think we are getting confused when it comes to morals...

I think what I consider moral is to do what's best for humanity. Theists' morals (I believe) lead you to do what's best for your god. I see a problem with these morals because anyone with a particular god can justify the murder of innocent babies if it's in the name of a god. I cannot ever justify the murder of innocent babies since that would be counter-productive to maintaining humanity. And yes, innocent babies have been slaughtered at the hands of both god and other christians.

The only other thing I can really respond to is your post about sin. I challenge you to show me that the way I live my life is somehow more moral than the way you live yours. It's amazing that you, not knowing anything about me, can say that I am an immoral person just because I do not believe in your god. That's a womderful way to look at the world and other human beings that automatically just because they don't think like you, they are automatically immoral and sinful.

Your bible may say that I am a sinful person, but I rest easy every night knowing that the world is a better place because I exist. I do any number of things each day to make others' lives easy. I generally care about other human beings and show this everyday.

You're almost creating problems where there are none to begin with by saying that someone is sinful for not believing in your creed. How does that add up to creating a better world for everyone?
 
Upvote 0
C

ContentInHim

Guest
How fair is this? The fact that I'm moral is due all to christianity's influence on me? But if I were evil, it would be because of the devil or because I don't accept god?

That's pretty cheap of christianity to take credit for all that is good and pawn off all that's bad on everything else.
What is the basis of your morality? Your law/civil law/???? If your morality is based on your own opinions, then of course you are moral. I was also until I discovered how horribly mistaken I was. :D
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
In the 1850's, many people still didn't see black slaves as people either.

What exactly is a human being? A living organism capable of A, B, C, D, etc? Well if a fetus does not meet this criteria, then it's not a human being.

The only difference between blacks and whites was skin color and other visual differences. Their point wasn't valid.
 
Upvote 0
C

ContentInHim

Guest
What exactly is a human being? A living organism capable of A, B, C, D, etc? Well if a fetus does not meet this criteria, then it's not a human being.

The only difference between blacks and whites was skin color and other visual differences. Their point wasn't valid.
The Bible clearly indicates that a fetus is a living being which is known by God. Your opinion is just that; God's opinion is something different. :)
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
What is the basis of your morality? Your law/civil law/???? If your morality is based on your own opinions, then of course you are moral. I was also until I discovered how horribly mistaken I was. :D

Like I said, if you can show me how mistaken I am by living my life the way I am, then I will adjust my moral compass. But other than telling me how I live "is against the bible", you have no case.

You don't believe in Allah (who muslims have evidence for), and when I say I don't believe in either god, I'm an blockhead for not seeing all the evidence....interesting.
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
The Bible clearly indicates that a fetus is a living being which is known by God. Your opinion is just that; God's opinion is something different. :)
You all cannot use the bible as evidence. You do understand that your religion is based on faith, right? Faith that the bible is correct and that other holy books are not, right?

If there was evidence that the bible was right, there would be no need for faith. You would believe based on evidence.....that's not faith.

So given that you belief is based on faith, you can't use your belief as evidence of something. Please give me evidence of how a fetus can live as a human being outside of its host mother.
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Get a hold of the videos. Honestly. Why does society at large need to accept it? And what is society other than people? Some people believe, as they've witnessed miracles; most, like yourself, aren't willing to find out if it's *really* true. Tell me something, honestly, k? If you were to see these miracles - and there is simply no other explanation - would you then re-think your position, or would you still refuse to believe?

Have you ever seen Chris Angel Mindfreak? Surely you don't know right away how he performs his "magic", but you still know in the back of your mind that there's a logical explanation for what he does.

Just because someone tells me they saw the boogeyman doesn't mean I'm going to believe them and believe its a miracle. I need evidence. I'm consistent with what I believe in. I don't take people on their word sometimes and require evidence other times. I require evidence ALL the time when someone comes to me with an outrageous claim, even if it's my father that's telling me he just spoke with god.
 
Upvote 0

HypnoToad

*croak*
Site Supporter
May 29, 2005
5,876
485
✟104,802.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
What exactly is a human being? A living organism capable of A, B, C, D, etc? Well if a fetus does not meet this criteria, then it's not a human being.
So anyone not self-sustaining is not human?
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Human DNA, and being put together by God.
You cannot prove that I did not put myself together. Therefore, I believe that god had nothing to do with it.

Silly reasoning isn't it? just because I can't prove that god didn't make humans doesn't mean that god actually made us.

So yeah, me putting myself together is no more valid than god putting me together.

But you're right, the DNA is there, but my hair has my DNA as well, if I pluck it out, does that mean I just killed myself or another human being? Not hardly.
 
Upvote 0

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
39,044
9,489
✟420,938.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
You cannot prove that I did not put myself together. Therefore, I believe that god had nothing to do with it.

Silly reasoning isn't it? just because I can't prove that god didn't make humans doesn't mean that god actually made us.

So yeah, me putting myself together is no more valid than god putting me together.

But you're right, the DNA is there, but my hair has my DNA as well, if I pluck it out, does that mean I just killed myself or another human being? Not hardly.
Your hair does not grow into a baby, which grows into a child, which grows into a youth, which grows into an old man. A fetus does. "Fetus" is Latin for "offspring" for a reason.
 
Upvote 0

Zocrates

Active Member
Jul 19, 2007
135
11
42
✟22,918.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Your hair does not grow into a baby, which grows into a child, which grows into a youth, which grows into an old man. A fetus does. "Fetus" is Latin for "offspring" for a reason.

An egg or a sperm is the same way. It's not yet a human being but given the right environment, it can become one. Does this mean we should put a stop to menstruation or nocturnal emission? No.

A fetus needs certain things in order to become a human being (which it is not yet) the same way a sperm needs an egg (among other things) to become human.
 
Upvote 0