Theistic Evolution - what is it?

[random_guy]

Mate, I don't understand the lie of evolution, because it is not a reality. The mathematics have been done, but it would take a while to type it all out here. If I could scan a page in, I might do that... but why waste time, huh?

Lucky for you, I'm also a math major. Funny that your comment shows that you also don't understand math if you think that's a proof. That's just probability with large state spaces and single events. All your probability math is based on flawed premises.

According to mathematics, events with 0% probability of occurring can occur. Does this mean that a miracle happened and God intervened? No, not really. This happens all the time.

As to your mentioning of alleles and genetic variations in people, what have you proven? Nothing at all, that's what. I know about alleles and that variation takes place, but this is not an evolution of anything... And so your reasoning skills are certainly lacking.

Again, you show your ignorance of science and evolution. Evolution is defined as allele frequencies changes over time in a gene pool. So technically, either your reasoning skills are lacking, or your understanding is lacking.

By the way, I do not reject the real scientific method. Merely theorizing is not science.

Have you heard of the 'Electric Universe'? This is an idea that has real science behind it, unlike the Big Bang nonsense of mainstream 'science'. This 'theory', if you want to call it that, is getting closer to the biblical model of the universe, which is a pleasant surprise. Look it up why don't you? You call yourself a student of science... then you won't be afraid to investigate it, huh?

Okay, here's a video: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=RPYz3iWmyLo

Yeah, I looked at the "Electric Universe". Funny thing is, as a real student of science, I follow the evidence, not whether or not it matches some obscure idea in the Bible. Until "Electric Universe" has a lot of peer review published papers that rival BB theory, I'll continue to accept BB theory. Youtube links don't make a theory, evidence does. Now, here's the difference between people that accept science and Creationists, the second "Electric Universe" starts to have more evidence than BB, I will drop BB and accept "Electric Universe".

That's what makes a scientist. We follow the evidence to find the theory, not make a theory and search for supporting evidence, throwing all conflicting evidence aside.

 

[shernren]

And while we're at it, electric universe and similar plasma ideas are really just the dying breaths of the 1950s' steady state theories, which were invented explicitly to get rid of the Big Bang because ... surprise, surprise, the Big Bang sounds too much like a creation event for atheists to be happy about it.

Steady state and its descendant plasma cosmology are explicit attempts to avoid any kind of creation event whatsoever, at any space-time point in the universe's history.

The enemy of your enemy is not your friend.