• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The War on Entitlements

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Perhaps "entitlement" reform could begin by addressing the fact the wealthy have traditionally paid tax at a far lower rate (assuming that they pay tax at all) than the average citizen.

During the 2012 Presidential Election campaign it became public knowledge that Mitt Romney was being taxed at 14% - like Buffett, his receptionists and cleaning ladies are taxed at a far higher rate.

According to "The Atlantic," 7 000 American millionaires paid no federal income taxes in 2011 - that's an example of real "entitlement!"


Rule Rorschach: 7,000 Millionaires... in 2011 - Derek Thompson - The Atlantic[/url


[url]http://reason.com/archives/2012/11/26/the-latest-from-the-tax-me-more-crowd
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
SS is not run like an insurance program. It's ran like a ponzi scheme.

Actually it is run like a traditional pension plan. You may remember when many of those went broke because retirees began living too long and built up too many benefits.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Reagan raised the contribution rates, creating the Trust Fund, so the government would have another source of revenue.

Washington wants to 'fix' SS so they can maintain the flow of excess dollars which they will then continue to borrow.

SS is funded entirely with money that has been in circulation in the private economy, been earned and taxed. So the debt owed to SS is far different from money owed to bondholders, who borrow freshly printed money.

Upper income earners supplement lower income earners in that they receive smaller benefits at retirement in proportion to their contribution.

SS, like most pension plans (and like payouts by Readers Digest and Publishers Clearing House) are pyramid schemes, where new money flows upwards from an expanding base of many new enrollees to a few beneficiaries at the top. Of course as the new enrollees diminish in number their contribution must increase or the whole thing falls apart.

SS is still providing excess funds for the the government to borrow, and will for some years yet. The big concern of the government isn't the ability of SS to pay retiree benefits but the maintenance of the flow of excess Trust Fund monies that it needs to help fund other programs.

We have a government that is 'eating it's young' in order to keep the family fed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0