Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
True enough. You have your own assumption, and you're not interested in whether the evidence supports it or not.
The laptop’s provenance was suspect from the beginning.
“Images” of emails, (instead of actual emails with headers intact).
The spin of “oh lookie, the real ‘crime family’ was the Bidens all along!”
The cynicism that the electorate would be stupid enough to swallow this “if only Twitter hadn’t suppressed it!”, is depressing.
Take it up with Reuters. They're the leftist organization that wrote the article. Maybe they actually knew what they were talking about."tackle antivaxxers" or "tackle misinformation? The former, I could see being problematic. The latter is, AFAIC, their obligation.
Oh look at that! Outside of the headline it clearly indicates its the latter.
talking about transgender, gay folks? Discussing the belief of social injustices? No freedom of speech for this issue.
Protecting medical lies? THIS is crucial to the universe.
I'm totally interested, which is why I noticed that your propaganda line is just that--propaganda.
What evidence in the Twitter files demonstrates my assumption is unwarranted?
That depends on what you assume.OK, then:
Just so I know: Is the problem that twitter "surpressed" information or is the problem that twitter is SUPER POPULAR and well used and surpressed information?
Yet another example of “business as usual” being portrayed as “Oh! Look, a Big Left-Wing SCANDAL!”There have been many frivolous and unsupported lawsuits submitted. Just because a lawsuit exists, it does not mean that there is any supporting evidence.
Many on this forum are claiming that Biden and the government went to these social media companies and forced them to suppress certain content. I am just asking people to provide evidence or links to articles that present the evidence. I'd be keen to know, and I'd be just as shocked as the rest of you if only I could see evidence supporting the claim.
The stuff that Elon has released, the stuff that Zuckerburg has said, none of it even hints of the government coercing them to shut down any content.
At the moment, the claim seems to be baseless. Yet again, just baseless drama coming from the far right drama club.
Yet an actual email has headers that show where the senders originated from.Actual emails aren't stored on a computer. They're in the servers of Google, Yahoo, etc. and are accessed by a computer. Therefore, an image of it as it appears on a computer is all that would be stored on a laptop.
I thought the claim in this thread was that candidate Biden's team asked Twitter to remove nude pictures of his son posted without permission. Not sure where the government part comes from.The problem is that the government colluded with a private business to suppress information from the people.
Now that is a new claim, that these emails are actually not on the hard drive but in the cloud. You realize of course that that means the laptop itself is totally irrelevant?Actual emails aren't stored on a computer. They're in the servers of Google, Yahoo, etc. and are accessed by a computer. Therefore, an image of it as it appears on a computer is all that would be stored on a laptop.
There have been many frivolous and unsupported lawsuits submitted. Just because a lawsuit exists, it does not mean that there is any supporting evidence.
Many on this forum are claiming that Biden and the government went to these social media companies and forced them to suppress certain content. I am just asking people to provide evidence or links to articles that present the evidence. I'd be keen to know, and I'd be just as shocked as the rest of you if only I could see evidence supporting the claim.
The stuff that Elon has released, the stuff that Zuckerburg has said, none of it even hints of the government coercing them to shut down any content.
At the moment, the claim seems to be baseless. Yet again, just baseless drama coming from the far right drama club.
But Joe wasn’t in the White House then; Donald was.It is about the White House having connections with the largest social media company on earth and shaping what is allowed to be posted - having a role in banning thousands of political opponents and even the US's oldest publication - all to protect Joe.
There are multiple things that are claimed, but haven't been established as fact.I'm curious. What you would accept as "evidence"?
Pffft, facts. They just get in the way of what is REALLY going on.But Joe wasn’t in the White House then; Donald was.
Speaking of that letter of the alphabet: Trump Speaks At Mar-A-Lago Event Featuring QAnon BelieverPffft, facts. They just get in the way of what is REALLY going on.
The Deep State, it's an incredible thing and amazing how wide spread and pervasive it is. It can defy facts and logic and evidence. It can even include Republicans (RINOS) and Trump appointed judges (traitors).
You really nee \d to start educating yourself by getting into the latest Q Anon information. It's just WOW, very hard to believe what is REALLY going on. Who woulda thought it possible?
Only if you believe that the email images were faked by Hunter, who then abandoned the laptop at the repair shop in order to implicate himself and his dad.Now that is a new claim, that these emails are actually not on the hard drive but in the cloud. You realize of course that that means the laptop itself is totally irrelevant?
With Joe about to be in an election to be the next president, who do you believe the people in the FBI wanted to be the next president without having to face any interference from Joe/Hunter's shady business dealings?But Joe wasn’t in the White House then; Donald was.
Back to Trumpwin's Law again?Speaking of that letter of the alphabet: Trump Speaks At Mar-A-Lago Event Featuring QAnon Believer
Joe was not necessarily about to be elected. And at that point, Donald was President Donald. The FBI is also not the White House; President Donald was the White House.With Joe about to be in an election to be the next president, who do you believe the people in the FBI wanted to be the next president without having to face any interference from Joe/Hunter's shady business dealings?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?