Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We’re saying the same thing. Maybe I’m having a bad day and I’m not being clear.Then I guess this is goodbye then.......bye!
We’re saying the same thing. Maybe I’m having a bad day and I’m not being clear.
But the Church can get around that simply by calling the changes "development of doctrine."
Haha, an article from a Sedevacantist. Nice try. Next we will see an article from an ex priest who is now married.Certainly. Here's an article from a Catholic source including examples as you requested:
: Quidlibet : › Papa Pachamama’s Profession of the Modernist Heresy
Here's an excerpt from the article. It follows references to official documents and the statements of several Popes. The red part is colored and bolded by me for emphasis; everything else is as written in the article.
"The argument here, once again, is that a dogma can “evolve” to have a new meaning which is the diametric opposite of its original sense. Thus, we can evolve from the proposition, “Lacking baptism, an unbaptized child cannot go to heaven,” to “Well, we can hope that that dogma is false, because we now realize that the Church misunderstood the Gospel.” This is yet another real twofer: No only does it get you dogmatic evolution, but it also gets you a magisterium that can teach the opposite of a truth of revelation."
Haha, an article from a Sedevacantist. Nice try. Next we will see an article from an ex priest who is now married.
Vatican I
If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the Church which is different from that which the Church has understood and understands: let him be anathema.
We’re saying the same thing. Maybe I’m having a bad day and I’m not being clear.
noWhen was the Second Vatican Council officially anathematized?
ink sock questi
Trick question???
ah, I see how this addresses my post responding to the Church changing doctrine.Absolutely. There is no doubt that the Second Vatican Council made significant changes to the Roman Catholic Church which have been steadily implemented since then, even as the Council of Trent initiated the Counter-Reformation. Catholics tend to blur any of these changes as insignificant tweaks such as merely shifting a hunk of stone from a wall into the space formed under architectural crossing of the church building. A few Catholics have attempted to call the Church out on these changes, insisting, for example, on retaining the Latin mass rather than shifting to mass in the common languages of the areas where churches are located.
ah, I see how this addresses my post responding to the Church changing doctrine.
thank you for your contribution.Thank you. What is your understanding of Vatican II?
Absolutely. There is no doubt that the Second Vatican Council made significant changes to the Roman Catholic Church which have been steadily implemented since then, even as the Council of Trent initiated the Counter-Reformation. Catholics tend to blur any of these changes as insignificant tweaks such as merely shifting a hunk of stone from a wall into the space formed under architectural crossing of the church building. A few Catholics have attempted to call the Church out on these changes, insisting, for example, on retaining the Latin mass rather than shifting to mass in the common languages of the areas where churches are located.
Protestant motto: "Seeking disagreement in the midst of agreement for 500 years and counting".But the Church can get around that simply by calling the changes "development of doctrine."
but scripture is so clear, even a babe knows exactly what it means.Protestant motto: "Seeking disagreement in the midst of agreement for 500 years and counting".
I have a simple test that I apply anymore. Imagine their response if the poster had been in any of the many Protestant denominations. If that response is diametrically different than how they respond to the same post from a Catholic, then it is all knee-jerk reaction after that.but scripture is so clear, even a babe knows exactly what it means.
I don't believe that I've ever heard a Protestant say that. Of course, we both know that it was meant as a sarcastic joke.Protestant motto: "Seeking disagreement in the midst of agreement for 500 years and counting".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?