• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Truth Beneath It All.

May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Good Evening/Day to you.

There are some nagging thoughts that I have finally decided to write down and ask about. I will accept any and all answers/comments.

As my title suggests, my biggest wonder is what is the truth beneath it all? We as a people come from vastly different religious backgrounds and beliefs, and many of us have beliefs that contradict each other completely. This has resulted throughout history in some ofd the most saddest and terrible episodes of humanity. The invasion and genocide of the Canaanites, The persecution of the early Christians, the wars against the pagan peoples in all corners of the world, the crusades, the inquisition, and now the current Jihad against the West, perputated by radical Imams who are twisting their own faith for benefit.

We are essentially allowing differences in beliefs, something that in reality means very little, to make us hate and wish harm on one another. We are seeing people with different beliefs as inhuman and beneath us. You could say that religious beliefs are bringing out the worst in us all, though that is often not the case.

I am a lover of history, so I have researched and studied these atrocities with a interest, and we are also witnessing this in our current world. It truly breaks my heart to see humanity killing each other over petty things.

But as to the point of this, I have noticed a similar theme that courses through all religions. The Abrahamic faiths, Buddhism, Confucianism, Many pagan religions, Hinduism, and many others. And whenever you study these religions, there always seems to be the underlying rule. "Do to others what you would have them do to you."

My thought is that, would you say that there is a sort of primal connection between all religions, despite all the dogma, rules, and other beliefs that we heap on it? That this one rule is, in reality, the one rule to follow?

Now, personally, I think that that is the truth in it's most basic form. That whatever power forged us made within us this one simple rule, and we have heaped upon it all these extra rules such as "follow this particular religion", or "Believe in this man or burn in Hell". Why does our religious preferences mean anything in the long run? As a matter of fact, why does our belief matter at all? If we follow this one rule, would everything else not fall into place? In this life and the next?

I think so. Because in the end Love wins. It always will.
 

Faulty

bind on pick up
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2005
9,467
1,019
✟87,489.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Our belief matters because of John 3:16-18.

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God."
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
 
Upvote 0

GrayAngel

Senior Member
Sep 11, 2006
5,372
114
USA
✟28,792.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Belief does matter, because Jesus is the only justification for us going to Heaven. It matters because no matter what you believe, reality will not fix itself to fit whatever faith you personally prefer.

"Do unto others as you would have them do to you" is another way of saying, "Love your neighbor as yourself." This is only the second most important law. Without the first law, this one is useless.

That being said, I believe it is inaccurate to say that religion starts wars, because as you've pointed out, most of them promote peace. The problem, then, is with people, not religion. Without religion to supposedly justify their actions (which would require reversing the role of religion and desire, making desire the interpreter of religion), we would have just as many wars.
 
Reactions: drich0150
Upvote 0
May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
While I agree your answers for the most part, there are a few I think you have stretched a little too far.


To Love others is to love "God". As Christians are fond of saying, Love is God. If I recall, that is what Jesus of Nazareth preached was the key.



Buddhism, yes that is right. Hinduism, you are correct as well. As for Confucianism not being a religion, that depends on what you define as a religion. It has worship of something, thus it counts as one for me. But that is a debate for another time.


I am quite aware of the means, thank you. As a History lover, I would be very much aware of them.


If there is a religion like that, I have not heard of it. But you seem to have a distaste for this "one religion" if you point them out. What religion would that be?

No again, without the reasons why we follow the rules the act of following means absolutely nothing unless you are a humanist or a confusists. Kinda convenient for the world's religion, but it leaves the rest of us with nothing.

It would seem we follow these rules due to the dogma we heap upon the only rule we need. And I assure you, I am not a Humanist.


Not sure what relevance that holds. All those religons roots are in the golden rule, so saying how many followers there are of those religions is a meaning that evades me.


That "foot note" seems to be the basis of the religions I mentioned. Now, I do not agree with the saying "the ends justify the means." Remember, people in all religions have used some rather...harsh measures to get their faith spread. In doing so, they forget that Golden Rule.

Long run like eternity?

I guess you could say that. It would seem that our belief in a wrathful and vengeful deity is dying, and we are realizing that it is not religious beliefs that counts, but the love within. But that is yet another thread.


"Sell your soul?" I did not know souls had a price! I did not know that loving others would be selling out your soul. I thought that God was love, but I could be mistaken, I suppose. And I never said it was "my" goal.



Define Love. Now who are we supposed to love? Why?

Now that is a tough thing to define, yet maybe the simplest at the same time. I would take a chance at saying that Love was compassion, mercy, forgiveness, charity, empathy, and all good things rolled into one, but that is strictly my personal guess. As for who we are suppose to love, I would venture to guess that you should love others as you love yourself. That is what that noble soul from Nazareth said. I have a feeling he was right. After all, "God" is love, and God dwells within us.

"To love someone is to see the face of God".
 
Upvote 0

DCJazz

Doctor Coffee
Dec 15, 2010
583
27
Idaho, USA
✟23,425.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
While I agree your answers for the most part, there are a few I think you have stretched a little too far.

Hmmmm...
*begins drinking coffee*
To Love others is to love "God". As Christians are fond of saying, Love is God. If I recall, that is what Jesus of Nazareth preached was the key.

*gulp, choke, splutter*
PHBHBPBHBHBPHBPHTTTTTTTTT~~~~~~
/spit take

I'm sorry but that's wrong. To love others is not to love God. To say this means that everyone is God, and that God is everyone. This is not what Christians believe, who uphold that God is 3 Persons, 1 Being; that is to say 'God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit'. We, human beings (1 Persons, 1 Being each) are his creation; we are not deities, nor would we ever be able to obtain such a goal.

As for what Christians are 'fond of saying'... I have always said "God is Love", not "Love is God". For with the first one, you say that God is a God of Love, that he loves us all to the point of death on a cross, but hates wickedness and sin. The second one you are essentially saying an emotion is a god. That Love, which all humans feel in one form or other, no matter how corrupt, is a god, and that in that sense, we all have God inside us, or that we are all God. This is inaccurate and blasphemous.

As for what Jesus preached, yes, he did teach us about love... but it was not key in and of itself. Jesus said that the only way to the Father was through him. I should think that would be far more key, seeing as how he not only knew the manner of his death, but went to it willingly in order to pay for the sins of the world, that we would have a chance of redemption through Him. Love alone will not save you, but it is because of God's Love for us (which is not only perfect, but unconditional, unlike human love) that Jesus even died for us in the first place.

I don't even need to get into the rest of your post... sigh.
I don't mean to be rude, or if I understood you correctly, but what you were trying to say here... sigh.

God is Love. And we are neither Love, nor God.
 
Upvote 0
May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
*gulp, choke, splutter*
PHBHBPBHBHBPHBPHTTTTTTTTT~~~~~~
/spit take

Might want to watch when you take a drink if you're gonna have that reaction. And tone down to a less powerful coffee.


The two are one and the same. God is Love, and Love is God. And I NEVER said that humans were God. God dwells within. We have a spark of the divine within us, but no, that does not make us gods. I think you are misinterpreting what I meant.


As I stated above, God is Love and Love is God. Love cannot be corrupt. When you see a sort of "corrupt love" it is a perversion, and not honest Love. And thinking outside the box has always been deemed "blasphemous".


I am actually researching for a new thread about what Jesus meant when he said his famous "father through him" verse. There is something much deeper then that. But that is for a different thread. As well as the "redemption through him alone", as that goes against what he taught. But Love doesn't save you, no. You don't need to be saved. Love is what builds you. Unconditional love, to be exact. But that is different thread for a different day.

I don't even need to get into the rest of your post... sigh.
I don't mean to be rude, or if I understood you correctly, but what you were trying to say here... sigh.

I did not even need to get into the rest of your Bible. When I read about a "God of Love" ordering the death of thousands, and massacring whole peoples, I put the book down and sighed. See? Maybe you should have read the whole post, because you very clearly did not understand correctly.

God is Love. And we are neither Love, nor God.

Love is the very core of the human spirit. If we woke up and realized this, so much pain would stop. Sadly, that is our own ignorance causing that pain. And no, we are not "God". God is within us, and we have that shred of it within us.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Ultimately though, Christianity is not a philosophy you can buy into or not.

It's a claim that God acted decisively in history in the death and resurrection of Jesus who is now Lord and demands everyone's allegiance. The world fundamentally changed - the old creation finished and the new began - on Easter morning or it didn't.
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Love is the very core of the human spirit. If we woke up and realized this, so much pain would stop. Sadly, that is our own ignorance causing that pain.

Put that together with this:

"I am actually researching for a new thread about what Jesus meant when he said his famous "father through him" verse."

He is Light, actively shining on all.
 
Upvote 0

Living in the Light

How may I be a better Christian?
Jan 7, 2012
923
66
United States
✟23,871.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
This is not complicated: mankind must have a change of heart to love, help, and encourage his neighbors. This all starts at home, in our neighborhoods, in our communities. Why not let it grow as the mustard seed? We have Jesus' teachings. What are we waiting for? Do a good deed today. Maybe start with someone you don't like.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
That one wasn't exactly about religious beliefs. It was a title dispute and the Israelites were expelling squatters.

We are essentially allowing differences in beliefs, something that in reality means very little, to make us hate and wish harm on one another.
I would put it differently. It could well be that those differences in beliefs mean a whole lot. However, we are not sure what the difference may mean. So the problem is that we are rejecting tolerance toward other beliefs and trying to use force to make people believe as we do.

Now, you are referring to beliefs about deity. But humans fight for other beliefs, also. I think the diffence in belief concerning the rightness of slavery meant a lot, and, while saddened that 625,000 people died so that slavery was abolished in the US, I think that fight was worth making. Do you agree or disagree?

I think the people's right of self-determination (another belief) also means a lot. So I think the war to free Kuwait from occupation meant a great deal. Agree or disagree?

We are seeing people with different beliefs as inhuman and beneath us.
It's a pretty standard tactic to dehumanize your enemy. So putting this only in the context of religious belief is invalid.

You could say that religious beliefs are bringing out the worst in us all, though that is often not the case.
You can say that about every human ideal! The belief that American democracy is good and Communism bad led to My Lai and the famous "We had to destroy the village in order to save it." Do you consider atheism a religious belief? If not, then you can't complain about religion when atheists, when presented with political power, have also shown the worst in us all.

Does atheism have that? I've never seen it codified.

My thought is that, would you say that there is a sort of primal connection between all religions, despite all the dogma, rules, and other beliefs that we heap on it? That this one rule is, in reality, the one rule to follow?
It's a rule. I would not go so far as to say it is the rule. I submit the rule of "forgive those who trespass against us" is also a good rule to follow. So is the rule of leaving the toilet seat down if you are a man.


It's a truth in a basic form. Is it the truth? No. You can't make that argument. There are other truths out there.

Now, the golden rule is a good guide, and I agree the world would be a better place if everyone lived by it, but there are going to be gray areas where you may have to violate it. For instance, if you see a woman being raped, what do you do? You have 2 neighbors there. If you save the woman by physically attacking the rapist (my choice), that means not showing any "love" for the rapist.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
To Love others is to love "God". As Christians are fond of saying, Love is God. If I recall, that is what Jesus of Nazareth preached was the key.
As Drich pointed out, it is "God is love". This is not a case where you can reverse the order. For instance, you can say "dog is mammal" but you can't say "mammal is dog". Same thing applies here. An emotion -- love -- cannot be God. That would violate the 1st Commandment.

Not sure what relevance that holds. All those religons roots are in the golden rule, so saying how many followers there are of those religions is a meaning that evades me.
You have it backwards. The religions are not rooted in the golden rule, but rather the golden rule is rooted in the religions. Deity comes first, then comes the golden rule.

That so many religions have the golden rule can be used to argue, as Harvey Cox and others do, that a single deity set up all the religions.

Remember, people in all religions have used some rather...harsh measures to get their faith spread. In doing so, they forget that Golden Rule.
Let me submit that what they have done is spread their own, human power. In those cases the faith was simply a means for political and secular power. People have also misrepresented ideas that are not religious faith in an effort to gain power.

I guess you could say that. It would seem that our belief in a wrathful and vengeful deity is dying, and we are realizing that it is not religious beliefs that counts, but the love within. But that is yet another thread.
A belief in a wrathful and vengeful deity goes hand in hand with belief in a deity that is partisan for an individual tribe or nation. The deity is wrathful as it works vengeance on those outside the nation who hurt the nation the deity is protecting. As we focus on deity that is for everyone, it is difficult to have such a deity be "wrathful and vengeful", because such a deity is only hurting its own subjects.

Now that is a tough thing to define, yet maybe the simplest at the same time. I would take a chance at saying that Love was compassion, mercy, forgiveness, charity, empathy, and all good things rolled into one, but that is strictly my personal guess.
You might try 1 Corinthians 13.

As for who we are suppose to love, I would venture to guess that you should love others as you love yourself. That is what that noble soul from Nazareth said.
That was the second part of the Great Commandment. BTW, drich is quoting from Matthew that "love God" is the greatest commandment. In Mark and Luke the 2 commandments are not ranked but are equal. The same applies when they first appear in the OT.
 
Upvote 0

unique101

Newbie
Feb 15, 2012
13
0
✟22,623.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
HeathenWarrior
I can go along with your proposition of this rule
"Do to others what you would have them do to you."
If this rule was to be applied yes then the world would be a better place to live in.
But then the question remains why are there so much similarities between different religions and yet so much difference?
If we are all the same i.e mankind, in design and therefore in purpose, should we have the same manual of instruction ?
 
Upvote 0
May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Actually no we say God is love. The difference being we do not worship love. Love is an choice we reserve for God first.

God is Love and Love is God. They are one and the same.


Actually no again. Christ preached we are to love our lord God with all of our Heart, Mind, Spirit and strength. this is our greatest commandment.

See above.



Religion is the worship of a god. Confusism says there is no God only man/society. Therefore confusism is not a religion. At best it is a form of spirituality.

Again, we could debate that till the next year. It really just depends on how one defines a religion.



So Christianity and Islam do not love one another? Funny, I have seen quite a bit of genuine love from people in both of these faiths.

My God tells me there are two rules we all need. Not just the one.

Love seems to be the basis for those "two rules".



Seems eerily similar. Christians obey Jesus's laws, and Muslims Muhammad's. Both seek to be rewarded for their loyalty. Yet both hold Love as the highest principal.



Oh, so I "twisted it's intended purpose" did I? Alright then, go ahead and explain how I did so. Apparently, thinking outside the box is a horrendously blasphemous thing to do. I thought that pointing out the unifying factor would be a very good thing. Boy, how mistaken and blasphemous I must be!

If "these people" are operating outside of the rules of their faith, is it not fair to say they are not representing their God?

Their god must be very limited if they do show love "outside" of their faith.



For who? Those who feel they do not need to atone for sins?

I stated that will be covered in a different thread I am planning. You can take your shot at it there.


Apparently not, or perhaps you would not have sold/traded yours for the cost of your integrity. You gave away your integrity when you misrepresented the major religions of this world in an effort to unite all world religions under one rule.

And here we go. You are saying I have sold my integrity in an attempt to undermine the major religions of the world. At first I thought you might be able to have an honest debate with respect, but now you are claiming that I have sold my integrity. It is my integrity that caused me to point out that unifying factor in the first place.

Again that is what happens when you prize the result over the method in which you obtain those results. You may know your history but it does not seem it is stopping you from repeating it.

Really?



Now you are trying to claim that I am forcing "God" into my particular branch of love. I am quite sure of Love. Wrath and Love cannot co-exist.




Love is the keystone of those feelings. Without Love, those things would be nothing. Love is the key, and it always was. As for "not knowing God", I used to be like that. I used to a fundamentalist who spat on other people. Then you could say I found "God", and realized what I have been telling you, despite my so called "Integrity".


Do you have book chapter and verse for that or are you handing me your integrity yet again?
Here is a key word search to help you if you do not have a bible available to you:

Did I just rattle you so much that you are launching personal attacks on my integrity? Is that the best you can do?

But if you HAVE to have it, I suppose I can satisfy you.

John 4:16 "God is Love. Whoever lives in Love lives in God, and God in them"

Ironically, If what you have been saying is true, then God must have "Integrity" issues.

Peter 4:8 "Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins"

Hmmm...seems like Love really is what redeems us, in the end.

Are you trying to say Christ said this as well?

I just thought that was a true statement regardless of who said it.

Now on a final note, I did not come here to pick a fight. I did not come here for personal attacks or to tell people that their beliefs are false. That would go against my creed, the Law of Love. You are obviously very devout and passionate about your beliefs, and that is a good thing, if it helps you through life. I would just rather you resisted the urge to to make claims about my "integrity" or other things.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

unique101

Newbie
Feb 15, 2012
13
0
✟22,623.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
As a Seeker of Truth I need t understand clearly what is going on. Are you suggesting that Christianity is based on the love of Jesus and Islam is based on devotion of Mohamed and Judaism is based on .............. of Moses? Can you please fill in the blanki for me? Many thanks and kind regards.

The Seeker of Truth
 
Upvote 0
May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
There you go again. You are repeating the same thing over and over. If you wish to remain with your beliefs, do not think I'm stopping you. But making claims about how I am apparently trying to undermine the world's religions and pushing my agenda down your throat is essentially the "bearing false witness" that is suppose to be against all religions that I am at least aware of. And your stereotyping will not aid you in the long run.

You are right, Love and Pride cannot co-exist extensively. So you need to let go of that excessive pride.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

How quickly you have dropped a fact based argument for a desperate appeal to my vanity. Rather than addressing point by point where I had supposedly made false claims you choose to word an accusation according to the bible I believe in. Then as if that was not enough you appeal to my vanity concerning my personal pride.
Again no facts no cutting and pasting of evidence, just a desperate appeal in hopes that I stop holding what you have said and done to the light of truth. I'll make it easy for you if you want me to stop then simply stop trying to sell you message.

Know the offer stands if and when you will admit to what you have done here.
 
Upvote 0
May 18, 2011
415
32
✟23,559.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution

Better yet, how about if you don't want to hear me, then why don't you stop pestering me. You claim that I "appeal to your vanity concerning my personal pride". That is exactly what you did in your last post. Pure hypocrisy. And then you make claims about my integrity, which are blatant Ad Hominem attacks, and then feign innocence in that regard. I did not bother to copy and paste facts, as you would repeat the same vague argument over and over. You have made that brutally clear.

If you don't want to have an intelligent conversation, and just launch personal attacks, then run along to somewhere else.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Know the offer stands if and when you will admit to what you have done here.
 
Upvote 0