Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Mr Chansley had ineffectual counsel?The federal prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence in discovery from Jan 6th defendants lawyers prior to sentencing "Unlawful"
Tucker Carlson interviews Chansley's lawyer, exculpatory video surveillance was withheld by the federal prosecutors prior to sentencing
Federal Judges have and are releasing many in jail sentenced under the "obstruction law", they also are delaying future prosecution of such cases until the Supreme Court ruling expected in June 2024But that case doesn't have anything to do with any "narrative" false or otherwise. That appeal is really about whether obstruction of a proceeding under Title 18 of the US Code, Section 1512(c)(2) requires "some action with respect to a document, record or other object" to be obstruction. (I.e., is this a document tampering statute, or is it more broad.) Since there aren't many of the rioters who interfered with documents (perhaps none), under the ruling of one District Court Judge, it doesn't apply, but every other judge in the court and the appeals panel disagreed with the narrow view.
But that case doesn't have anything to do with any "narrative" false or otherwise. That appeal is really about whether obstruction of a proceeding under Title 18 of the US Code, Section 1512(c)(2) requires "some action with respect to a document, record or other object" to be obstruction. (I.e., is this a document tampering statute, or is it more broad.) Since there aren't many of the rioters who interfered with documents (perhaps none), under the ruling of one District Court Judge, it doesn't apply, but every other judge in the court and the appeals panel disagreed with the narrow view.
Federal Judges have and are releasing many in jail sentenced under the "obstruction law", they also are delaying future prosecution of such cases until the Supreme Court ruling expected in June 2024
You have been shown that the Federal prosecutors over stepped their bounds in political motivation IMHO, "Obstruction" and "Tresspass" as the federal district judges clearly explained, and the initial federal prosecutor of Jan 6th clearly identifed, no prosecution of anybody who entered an open Door, who wasn't violent or destroying property, a far cry from rants of everybody in the building is guilty, do you know of any persons like that?I didn't say anything different. But what I did say is that the use or non-use of this statute (or rather the appropriateness of it as a charge for the actions of the defendants inside the Capitol) is what is at issue, and it has exactly nothing to do with "The Truth Behind the Jan 6th Event" nor with the sentences of dozens of misdemeanor charged and convicted persons who were not convicted of it (and in most cases not even charged with it). Do you not understand that?
I have been shown by your opinion that prosecutors overstepped? Why should I care about anyone's opinion. (That is what IMHO means, after all.)You have been shown that the Federal prosecutors over stepped their bounds in political motivation IMHO,
Your sentence is difficult to parse. Only one Judge has ruled that the 18 USC 1512(c)(2) charge is misapplied. Not sure what you are talking about with the initial prosecutor."Obstruction" and "Tresspass" as the federal district judges clearly explained, and the initial federal prosecutor of Jan 6th clearly identifed, no prosecution of anybody who entered an open Door, who wasn't violent or destroying property, a far cry from rants of everybody in the building is guilty, do you know of any persons like that?
Considering how he likes to spread Russian misinformation and propaganda, I'm starting to believe even this is motivated by Russia in some way as Russia/Putin in the current situation benefits from this by muddying and destabilising the US political situation.Those Jan 6th rioters were as peaceful as a Russian Tank Division taking a leisurely stroll in the Ukrainian countryside, and met the same fate.
The initial leading federal prosecutor regarding the Jan 6th Capitol event "Michael Sherwin" has stated otherwise, your opinion is silencedAnd I'm sorry if you don't get it, but anyone who entered the Capitol without authorization was in violation of the law.
Where does prosecutor Michael Sherwin say that entering the Capital building without authorization was Not a violation of the law, was Not trespassing?The initial leading federal prosecutor regarding the Jan 6th Capitol event "Michael Sherwin" has stated otherwise, your opinion is silenced
Politico
Wide prosecutorial net
1-18-2024
The former prosecutor who oversaw the initial response to the Capitol Riot in early 2021, Michael Sherwin, said he had rejected many potential trespass cases at the outset of the investigation because suspects did not engage in violence, property damage or pushing over barricades.
“That changed when I left. I don’t know who authorized it, but I refused,” Sherwin said in an interview. “I had a bright-line rule … that people should not have been charged if they just walked in through an open door.”
You aren't responding to a post, your words have no foundationYes, instead he wanted to charge them with Seditious Conspiracy.
Seditious conspiracy - Wikipedia
That's not him stating that it wasn't in violation of the law, but rather that he had set up a policy that they wouldn't charge people in those particular cases. Not the same thing.The initial leading federal prosecutor regarding the Jan 6th Capitol event "Michael Sherwin" has stated otherwise, your opinion is silenced
Politico
Wide prosecutorial net
1-18-2024
The former prosecutor who oversaw the initial response to the Capitol Riot in early 2021, Michael Sherwin, said he had rejected many potential trespass cases at the outset of the investigation because suspects did not engage in violence, property damage or pushing over barricades.
“That changed when I left. I don’t know who authorized it, but I refused,” Sherwin said in an interview. “I had a bright-line rule … that people should not have been charged if they just walked in through an open door.”
Donald Trump told them to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to stop the certification of a fair and legal election. He overestimated how effective that would be. It wasn't for lack of trying. As you probably know, Trump has failed at most everything he's tried to do in his life, lacking the self-discipline to be an effective criminal.I know some people saw it as a real attempt to over throw the government, if so it was a very feeble attempt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?