The true context of science. It is just a model, get over it.

[ianw16]

And are everywhere we look....

Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to the Sun | Science Mission Directorate

And so obvious it's pathetic you can't see them...

Lol. From the article;

"Known as the Magellanic Bridge, the bridge is a huge stream of neutral gas."

Comprehension not your strong point, is it?

 

[ianw16]

How was the creation model deduced?

Just like electric universe woo, they made it up based on fairy tales. Velikovsky, in the case of the idiotic EU woo.

 

[ianw16]

What black hole????

Such as the one at the centre of our galaxy, known as Sgr A*. Orbital parameters prove there is a 4m solar mass object there. Gravitational redshift backs up that proof. Perhaps you can tell us what this massive object is? Some sort of electric woo, is it? Lol.

 

[ianw16]

And are everywhere we look....

Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to the Sun | Science Mission Directorate

Didn't read the papers, did you? This is a FTE. They are caused by magnetic reconnection! Oh dear.

Structure and evolution of flux transfer events near dayside magnetic reconnection dissipation region: MMS observations
Dong, X-C, et al.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017GL073411

 

[tas8831]

It seems you need to study definitions.

So it goes.

Give it up, losers - you are in the presence of the world's leading authority not just on specific fields of science, but what science actually IS! Bow down to his self-actualized greatness.... before he whines to the mods to close this thread, too...

 

[tas8831]

So you keep saying, yet in 80 years of null result after null result after null result, the pseudo scientists refuse to give up their Fairie Dust Dark Matter. But I do agree with you, “good” science corrects itself, while dogmatic adherents refuse to give up their “bad” pseudoscience.



Except it fits all observations......

Oh, you mean if we ignore that “God stretched out the heavens”? That part?

Is that on par with a cosmological model? A scientific model? Really?

I am not at all surprised that the obvious contradictory positions you routinely take were not obvious to you in your post.

 

[tas8831]

Agreed, It is pseudoscience - Fairie Dust.

Like how you claimed reproduction causes mutations?

 

[ianw16]

You have already mapped them, you just pretend it’s dark matter, even if gravity does not form Fillaments, electromagnetism does....

Wrong. If these filaments were currents, they would be obvious in synchrotron radiation. It isn't seen. However, modelling of the cosmic web can only reproduce the observed structure using DM!

The Network Behind the Cosmic Web
Coutinho, B. C. et al.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.03236.pdf

 

[tas8831]

Physicists may be happy with the idea that they are model builders, but I wouldn’t want to try telling a biologist the same thing. They probably think that the structure of human DNA is what it is, full stop.

Especially when we can sort of see it:

New imaging technique catches DNA ‘blinking’ on

 

[dad]

We can deduce there are fixed, real laws of Nature, which we can try to discover..

Seeing how things work doesn't tell us where the laws come from.

 

[Halbhh]

Seeing how things work doesn't tell us where the laws come from.

Agreed. We know nature is God's work. Physics is His design.

 

[dad]

Agreed. We know nature is God's work. Physics is His design.

Now, and here, yes, it is part of it, as is the spiritual and many other things also are! How would physics apply to the garden of Eden or heaven or the coming Millennium though?

There is danger in taking one part of an equation and making it the whole equation!

 

[dad]

Especially when we can sort of see it:

New imaging technique catches DNA ‘blinking’ on

Can you show us Noah's DNA or anyone from his time?

 

[dad]

Such as the one at the centre of our galaxy, known as Sgr A*. Orbital parameters prove there is a 4m solar mass object there. Gravitational redshift backs up that proof. Perhaps you can tell us what this massive object is? Some sort of electric woo, is it? Lol.

Have you any way of confirming the supposed mass of...whatever it is...without knowing the distance?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Have you any way of confirming the supposed mass of...whatever it is...without knowing the distance?

Orbital mechanics and gravitational red shift. The orbits of the stars around it indicate that it's a relatively small and extremely dense massive object, and the light coming from its vicinity is red-shifted, indicating a very strong gravitational field, and it is a powerful emitter of radio waves; all characteristics of black holes.

 

[ianw16]

Can you show us Noah's DNA or anyone from his time?

Noah is a fictional character. When are you proposing the he (didn't) live?

 

[ianw16]

Have you any way of confirming the supposed mass of...whatever it is...without knowing the distance?

The distance is ~ 8000 kpc. And it is irrelevant to measuring its mass, for the hard of thinking. As FB points out, we only need the orbital parameters of the stars around it. And Kepler's third law. Piece of cake.

M(bh) = (4 x pi^2 x a^3)/(G x P^2)

Where;
a = semi-major axis
G = gravitational constant
P = the orbital period

Do the maths. Comes out as ~ 4m solar masses. Gravitational redshift proves that it is a massive object.

 

[ianw16]

How would physics apply to the garden of Eden or heaven

You can't apply physics to things that are made up. Might as well apply it to Jack's beanstalk.

 

[Halbhh]

Now, and here, yes, it is part of it, as is the spiritual and many other things also are! How would physics apply to the garden of Eden or heaven or the coming Millennium though?

There is danger in taking one part of an equation and making it the whole equation!

Yep. When people don't have God, then they need some other 'god', some substitute, and that's about a million different things, often money or glamour or the body, ideologies, etc., but sometimes a kind of science fantasy or ideology. Beware that making up a new physics and then being faithful to it instead of merely testing it to find out if it works can itself be elevating one's theory into a special level of adoration.