- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,389
- 538
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
I'd be surprised if Paul demanded things, raising his voice, at healings taking place in some way...?That’s horrifying. St. Paul demanded that our worship be conducted “decently and in order.”
Paul taught us freedom, no laws, not like Moses' commands. It would be more like Paul to demand a way to help the poor in health or the hungry.
Paul's decency and order was for the use of spiritual gifts to work better, by them prophesying, one at a time. He did not forbid laughter in church. Somber no laughing services and RCC and later Lutheran and Anglican, in there were orders and danger.
People may begin with reverence but there is also the awesome side of God and we all have come to or aim to love with our whole hearts which is what the Blessing of the Father's Heart is much about. I have been in a few of these meetings, after being in RCC Charismatic meetings.
I have also been in Taize meetings, and receiving living water in one, made me want to be boisterous and I was corrected. Later in Full Gospel meetings I came to like boisterous petition and intercessions not in unison but all together and free worded.
Services from Paul's time until perhaps John Wesley did not record the actions of God's people receiving the Holy Spirit. And some of it was intended to criticize, "Holy Rollers", "Methodists". And there were the Quakers, and the amazing Azusa St phenomena. Descriptions from better writers than me like Guy Chevreau who used church history and referred to ecstasies experienced over days by those in former revivals, but not as laughter, but surely it was the same thing.
Last edited:
Upvote
0