The "Third Temple" Prophecy Refuted

[Dave G.]

If they did manage to build it, how do you suppose they are going to fulfill any prophecies recorded in the NT when they reject the NT as holy writ?

I for one believe the 70th week in Daniel 9 is future still. What I don't believe is that any of those events are meaning in a literal sense where it might involve literal brick and mortar temples, etc. To me it seems silly that a literal temple gets built, animal sacrificing starts up again, then 3.5 years later an abomination takes place in the temple, thus doing away with animal sacrificing all over again. If God still desired animal sacrificing, why did He allow the 2nd temple to be destroyed, then? So that another one can get built in the end of this age in order to fulfill some of these prophecies many are taking in a literal sense? Sounds far-fetched to me, but that's me, I can't speak for others.

God doesn't want animal sacrifices the Jews do and they will build a third temple. Remember for the most part they are still waiting for their savior to come , they didn't buy that Jesus was it. and 70 ad didn't convince them either.

If you guys think 70ad was the end, the 1000 year reign has passed and we now live in the Kingdom then Christianity was one huge flop. And just for the record I don't buy any of that.