The stumbling block for atheists.

[Radrook]

Yet another post devoid of any ID science.

It's science only when atheists do it.

 

[Loudmouth]

It's science only when atheists do it.

Yet another post devoid of any ID science.

 

[AV1611VET]

You weren't actually talking about seven ideas in science about where our moon came from? What were you talking about then? What were you talking about in that passage I quoted?

Did you happen to notice that I did not say we had about seven different ways our moon was formed?

Instead, I said there are about seven different ways we got our moon?

Do you see the difference?

The Capture Theory, for example, is not a theory as to how our moon was formed, but how it attempted to pass the earth and was captured by our gravity.

Read before you bleed.

 

[Radrook]

Yet another post devoid of any ID science.

Selective blindness isn't science as you seem to think.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Selective blindness isn't science as you seem to think.

No, but not giving a single shred of evidence isn't science.

 

[Loudmouth]

Selective blindness isn't science as you seem to think.

You can't accuse people of being blind to the evidence when you don't present any.

 

[Kylie]

Proclaiming it non-science is wishful thinking.

Science must be testable, and it must make predictions. I can do this with evolution. Please tell me how these can be done with ID.

 

[Kylie]

Did you happen to notice that I did not say we had about seven different ways our moon was formed?

Instead, I said there are about seven different ways we got our moon?

Do you see the difference?

The Capture Theory, for example, is not a theory as to how our moon was formed, but how it attempted to pass the earth and was captured by our gravity.

Read before you bleed.

Once again you quibble over insignificant details because you don't actually have a valid point. You know perfectly well what I was asking, now can you asnwer the question or not?

Tell me the seven ways.

 

[Radrook]

You can't accuse people of being blind to the evidence when you don't present any.

You can't accuse people of not presenting evidence when you refuse to see it.

 

[Radrook]

No, but not giving a single shred of evidence isn't science.

Calling evidence non-evidence isn't science.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Calling evidence non-evidence isn't science.

But you HAVEN'T presented any evidence.

 

[KCfromNC]

Proclaiming it non-science is wishful thinking.

If you really thought so you'd stop posting quotes from people who say it isn't science.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You can't accuse people of not presenting evidence when you refuse to see it.

You can't accuse people of "not seeing the evidence", if you're not presenting any...

 

[Loudmouth]

You can't accuse people of not presenting evidence when you refuse to see it.

Where in the quoted post is there any evidence?

 

[Loudmouth]

Calling evidence non-evidence isn't science.

Calling non-evidence non-evidence is exactly what science is about.

 

[Radrook]

Calling non-evidence non-evidence is exactly what science is about.

Unfortunately that isn't what atheist scientists do.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Unfortunately that isn't what atheist scientism do.

Now that just made no sense.

 

[AV1611VET]

Now that just made no sense.

"Scientism is a belief in the universal applicability of the scientific method and approach, and the view that empirical science constitutes the most authoritative worldview or the most valuable part of human learning—to the exclusion of other viewpoints."

SOURCE

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

"Scientism is a belief in the universal applicability of the scientific method and approach, and the view that empirical science constitutes the most authoritative worldview or the most valuable part of human learning—to the exclusion of other viewpoints."

SOURCE

Yes I know what the word means.
That whole chain of words, however, did not make sense.

 

[Radrook]

"Scientism is a belief in the universal applicability of the scientific method and approach, and the view that empirical science constitutes the most authoritative worldview or the most valuable part of human learning—to the exclusion of other viewpoints."

SOURCE

That was a typo! Sorry for the misunderstanding.