• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The seventh seal opened and Revelation unfolds

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Let's see, verse 5 in Matthew's OD:

5For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.​

This is not merely an imminent warning; this is addressed to anyone living in this age.

6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.​

Again, this is addressed to anyone in this age.

7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.​

Again, this is addressed to anyone in this age.

8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.​

Again, this is addressed to anyone in this age all the way up to verse 15, when the transition occurs in which he addresses the "first question."

There isn't one verse of Matthew 24:4-14 that addresses the "first question."

Don't know what you mean about be being a futurist. You're confused: what we have in the OD is telescoping, which allows for imminent and distant interpretation of passages. My interpretation that some passages are distant does not translate into holding futurism.

Luke's account of the phenomenon does not preclude Matthew's. Matthew's adds a detail his doesn't. This is merely a specious issue.

Adding spin is for futurist. Josephus maintains that the Romans made a desolation of his people and nation and connects it with Daniel. This supports historicism, even if its not liked by futurist.

And I do not disregard the issue of the end time. I wrote a book on it. The issue is that if you can't get the identities of Daniel and the Revelation correct, to include the OD, then your idea's about the end time are pointless to me, or anyone else pursuing the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,002
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,949.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Luke's account of the phenomenon does not preclude Matthew's. Matthew's adds a detail his doesn't. This is merely a specious issue.
Regarding the desolation of Jerusalem and the destruction of the 2nd temple - you have it just backwards.

Luke 21 has much more detail that Matthew 24.

Luke 21:20-21. The surrounded by armies warning is not in Matthew 24.
Luke 21:24. The Jews being taken captive into the nations is not in Matthew 24
Luke 21: 24 Jerusalem trodden down by the gentiles, until the times of the gentiles fulfilled is not in Matthew 24.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Apologetics maintain that we can expect different details by different persons of the gospels.
 
Upvote 0