The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed

[Calvinator]

While you're at it, Dan, why not draw in the line for the left leg up to, and illustrating the left thigh?

I'm sure it will convince a few people, and amuse me at the same time. Everyone's happy!

Your link doesn't work,

-Dan.

Link works fine for me, but for anyone who's having problems it's post #135 in this thread, page 14

 

[UncleHermit]

Yes, her torso is at an angle, no one is saying it isn't. However, even at an angle it still doesn't match her legs.

Where is her right thigh? Could you draw the position of the leg through the skirt, up to the thigh, to show us?

Well, her thigh is the only part of her leg that is under the skirt, but okay.

It's not perfect, because I didn't want to spend a lot of time on it (I can't believe this is even necessary) and because, hey, MS paint and mouse, but I think you get the general idea.

I have done a LOT of figure drawing, both clothed and unclothed, and there is nothing out of the ordinary about that pose.

 

[UncleHermit]

But she has CLAWS!!!!

(I laugh every time I see that)

Yeah, what are they even trying to say happened there? Someone accidentally elongated her finger during the photoshop? I looked at it close up, but it's hard to see anything because the jpg is so grainy. It looked to me like it's actually a combination of her index and middle fingers, but it's hard to tell.

 

[Oafman]

There are some pretty weird threads on this forum, but this one probably takes the biscuit.

Also, there are few that are in such bad taste.

 

[UncleHermit]

There are some pretty weird threads on this forum, but this one probably takes the biscuit.

Also, there are few that are in such bad taste.

And those two types of threads are not at all mutually exclusive. I actually feel a little physically ill for having participated in this one.

EDIT: whoops, I read that as "a few". Main point still stands.

 

[pgp_protector]

Well, her thigh is the only part of her leg that is under the skirt, but okay.

It's not perfect, because I didn't want to spend a lot of time on it (I can't believe this is even necessary) and because, hey, MS paint and mouse, but I think you get the general idea.

I have done a LOT of figure drawing, both clothed and unclothed, and there is nothing out of the ordinary about that pose.

snap.

 

[guitarmonster]

Although the picture does look a little odd, I feel like this is amongst the least in the many pieces of evidence surrounding this shooting. I noticed that when the mainstream media does their so called "debunking", they always put focus on the weaker pieces of evidence, throw in a few crazy comments off of a blog, and then declare it "disproven".

I have more serious questions about Ms. Soto, for instance why was she seen photographed with one of the Greenberg girls, from the same family of the couple that are suspected as playing the parts of Laura and Nick Phelps? The same family that has "Alexis Wasik" acting as a survivor, Michael Greenberg sitting it the background of another Victoria Soto picture. Why is Robbie Parker seen in a photo with Anne Levitman Greenberg, same family again. Why does Timothy Whale, who is seen in many photos with the Greenbergs look almost exactly like Robbie Parker, with the exception of hair and eye color? Why is Noah Pozner showing up in several of the Greenberg photos?

Let's not forget about property records, deeds, tax receipts, and a curious list of very specific homes sold in Sandy Hook on the same day, for $0.

Everyone has been fooled, but it is about to come to an end. A large release of evidence is about to hit, this evidence will put all theories to rest and will reveal facts. Expect to see something in the next few weeks. In the meantime keep those questions rolling around in your mind.

I can't wait to see the mainstream media squirm around this...

 

[UncleHermit]

Although the picture does look a little odd, I feel like this is amongst the least in the many pieces of evidence surrounding this shooting. I noticed that when the mainstream media does their so called "debunking", they always put focus on the weaker pieces of evidence, throw in a few crazy comments off of a blog, and then declare it "disproven".

I have more serious questions about Ms. Soto, for instance why was she seen photographed with one of the Greenberg girls, from the same family of the couple that are suspected as playing the parts of Laura and Nick Phelps? The same family that has "Alexis Wasik" acting as a survivor, Michael Greenberg sitting it the background of another Victoria Soto picture. Why is Robbie Parker seen in a photo with Anne Levitman Greenberg, same family again. Why does Timothy Whale, who is seen in many photos with the Greenbergs look almost exactly like Robbie Parker, with the exception of hair and eye color? Why is Noah Pozner showing up in several of the Greenberg photos?

Let's not forget about property records, deeds, tax receipts, and a curious list of very specific homes sold in Sandy Hook on the same day, for $0.

Everyone has been fooled, but it is about to come to an end. A large release of evidence is about to hit, this evidence will put all theories to rest and will reveal facts. Expect to see something in the next few weeks. In the meantime keep those questions rolling around in your mind.

I can't wait to see the mainstream media squirm around this...

Oh, joy. More "evidence".

 

[FrenchyBearpaw]

Yeah, there's many things that are odd and don't add up.

The one that gets me is, the six kids that were dropped off by the bus, had to drive directly past the firehouse, to get to Gene Rosen's house.

And why was Gene Rosen video taped at the firehouse staging area before the kids came to his house? Which then begs the question of why he feigned no knowledge of the shootings?

 

[Btodd]

These attempts at mystery-mongering (to borrow a phrase from Joe Nickell) kill me.

In the elaborate attempt to stage a giant hoax, the perpetrators always do the most idiotic things, like photoshop an upper torso on to a lower one in a way that is supposedly impossible (why didn't they just use a picture of that girl in the first place? Why the need to photoshop her upper torso on to another body?), or any other number of supposed anomalies that they somehow forgot to take care of, even though this is an elaborate hoax staged by the all-powerful government.

Each time, their plot is thwarted by self-proclaimed internet detectives, who are suddenly experts on photography, human anatomy and a host of other subjects that they previously had no experience in.

So the perpetrators are evil geniuses. I mean total idiots. I mean evil geniuses. Whatever, it's a conspiracy. Just believe; don't be a sheeple like everyone else...start making any manner stuff up that contradicts the main story, and you'll be sly like a fox.


Btodd

 

[guitarmonster]

I don't really give any credibility to that photo. Many people may not agree with me but even if we knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was photoshopped, it does not indicate foul play, just someone being an idiot with photoshop for some reason. The problem with "conspiracy theories" is that too many people take 2 photos that kind of look like each other and run with it like they've just closed the entire case. If someone chooses to look into things like this, they should make a decision to keep themselves organized and clear minded. Take all possibilities into consideration. I like the approach that the guys from "Ghost Hunters" take in their investigations, they try to look for reasons why the evidence is not true instead of trying hard to find reasons why it is. There is really credible evidence surrounding this shooting, but it is being buried by the mindless who just like you said, have suddenly become experts. I can't tell you how many times I have looked at something, only to later on realize that I was wrong and put it on the shelf. If I had reacted too quickly, I would have made myself look like an idiot. On the other hand, keeping the mindset to run every detail through the "test of fire" has allowed highly credible evidence to actually gain ground. The point is, if you have something that is true, nobody can ever prove it wrong.

 

[UncleHermit]

I don't really give any credibility to that photo. Many people may not agree with me but even if we knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was photoshopped, it does not indicate foul play, just someone being an idiot with photoshop for some reason. The problem with "conspiracy theories" is that too many people take 2 photos that kind of look like each other and run with it like they've just closed the entire case. If someone chooses to look into things like this, they should make a decision to keep themselves organized and clear minded. Take all possibilities into consideration. I like the approach that the guys from "Ghost Hunters" take in their investigations, they try to look for reasons why the evidence is not true instead of trying hard to find reasons why it is. There is really credible evidence surrounding this shooting, but it is being buried by the mindless who just like you said, have suddenly become experts. I can't tell you how many times I have looked at something, only to later on realize that I was wrong and put it on the shelf. If I had reacted too quickly, I would have made myself look like an idiot. On the other hand, keeping the mindset to run every detail through the "test of fire" has allowed highly credible evidence to actually gain ground. The point is, if you have something that is true, nobody can ever prove it wrong.

What is your evidence, already?

 

[guitarmonster]

It's going to be released shortly. We are still wrapping things up. The problem is that we have gotten our hands on some resources that have proven to be really useful. Releasing what we have right now will prompt those involved to scrub it as fast as they can.

I can tell you that this has been a very exhausting project, even with all of the people working at full capacity it's been extremely difficult to cover every angle.

 

[UncleHermit]

yeah, i'll be waiting

 

[FrenchyBearpaw]

These attempts at mystery-mongering (to borrow a phrase from Joe Nickell) kill me.

In the elaborate attempt to stage a giant hoax, the perpetrators always do the most idiotic things, like photoshop an upper torso on to a lower one in a way that is supposedly impossible (why didn't they just use a picture of that girl in the first place? Why the need to photoshop her upper torso on to another body?), or any other number of supposed anomalies that they somehow forgot to take care of, even though this is an elaborate hoax staged by the all-powerful government.

Each time, their plot is thwarted by self-proclaimed internet detectives, who are suddenly experts on photography, human anatomy and a host of other subjects that they previously had no experience in.

So the perpetrators are evil geniuses. I mean total idiots. I mean evil geniuses. Whatever, it's a conspiracy. Just believe; don't be a sheeple like everyone else...start making any manner stuff up that contradicts the main story, and you'll be sly like a fox.


Btodd

So, in short, all you have is mainstream media telling you a loner, Adam Lanza, walked into a school and killed 26 people, then shot himself, after shooting his mother earlier in the morning.

Have you seen any bodies, blood, EMS workers, interviews of the three victims who were taken to the hospital, over four hundred students, a school where children returned to school three weeks later, but the school has a security fence around it now? Does anything at all ring true when compared to other documented tragedies?

Oh, and I made a pretty clear statement regarding the facts: Why was Gene Rosen videographed at the fire station, then feign ignorance about the shooting when six children drove PAST the fire house and were deposited on his lawn?

 

[JustMeSee]

This makes Matt Marietta illuminati threads sound sane in comparison.

 

[jgarden]

"The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working.”
-Anonymous

"You simply cannot invent any conspiracy theory so ridiculous and obviously satirical that some people somewhere don't already believe it.
- Robert Anton Wilson, in Everything Is Under Control : Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-Ups (1998), Introduction, p. 16.

 

[PreachersWife2004]

It's going to be released shortly. We are still wrapping things up. The problem is that we have gotten our hands on some resources that have proven to be really useful. Releasing what we have right now will prompt those involved to scrub it as fast as they can.

I can tell you that this has been a very exhausting project, even with all of the people working at full capacity it's been extremely difficult to cover every angle.

Oh please. If you have evidence, you don't hold on to it.

Release it now, here at CF. Imagine you being the one to break the truth, right here at Christian Forums. It's movie material!!

 

[RedDead1981]

Oh please. If you have evidence, you don't hold on to it.

Release it now, here at CF. Imagine you being the one to break the truth, right here at Christian Forums. It's movie material!!

Now see, this is an example of one who isn't mentally ill, but rather has a self-imposed delusion of grandeur ("We're gonna blow the lid off it before 'they' can stop us and suppress the truth, fight the power!!!"). Very different from the one you and I were discussing in another thread. I enjoy a good laugh at these ones.

 

[guitarmonster]

Oh please. If you have evidence, you don't hold on to it.

Release it now, here at CF. Imagine you being the one to break the truth, right here at Christian Forums. It's movie material!!

I'm not interested in making a name for myself in the least, and I definitely don't want a movie either. There is no point if I release what we have now before we are done organizing and summarizing everything. What point would it make if I release what we have, then they go and destroy the rest of the evidence and then once again this "evidence" becomes a distant memory. That is why you hear of rumors of web pages being present before the shooting, but nobody has any proof of it. Of course everyone has screenshots, which literally mean nothing at all. As far as evidence a screenshot is worth basically nothing. People should have kept quiet and downloaded the pages first, then announce. But instead they jumped the gun and they had all of those pages as well as any cached copies scrubbed from the internet. Now it will be next to impossible to ever prove those pages existed. This is why we are not jumping the gun.

I can however ask those in here to help out with one piece of evidence. In the following document there is a lineup of 6 individuals.

These individuals may:
1. Claim to be the same person.
2. Claim to be completely different people.

There are no names, nor are they are indications, just photos with numbers. Take a look at these photos on this page and tell me whether or not you believe these are the same people or different people:

Facial comparison #1