• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Right to Create an Office

Did the Bishops of the early Church have the right to create an office called Priest?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

JimfromOhio

Life of Trials :)
Feb 7, 2004
27,738
3,738
Central Ohio
✟67,748.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Moses, back at Sinai, had set before Israel a great quest. He charged them to walk on with their God to become a 'kingdom of priests, and a holy nation'. (Exodus 19:6). This very same charge and destiny, to become 'a royal priesthood and a holy nation', was laid out for the Church by our Apostle Peter. (1Pet.2:9). They basically adopted that thought and used "Nation" from the greek word "Ethnos". Strongs defines Ethnos as a multitude associated or living together as a company, troop, swarm. A multitude of individuals of the same nature or genus the human family a tribe, nation, people group (Culture).

Every Christian is a citizen of heaven and to that sacred citizenship even though each Christian lives in a sinful world and sin will happen. Christians have a dual citizenship however earth is a sinful place while Heaven is beautiful and sinless that we are to remember that we are citizens of heaven even though we live in a foreign world. We CAN'T live here on earth as we will in Heaven. we are in Christ His position is our position, His privilege is our privilege, His possessions are our possessions, and His practice our practice. We are significant not because of who we are, but because of who we are in Christ. As Paul said, "By the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Nah........that is already passed thank God

Daniel 12:1 And in the time, that, Miyka'el shall stand, the chief, the great, the one standing over sons of thy People.
And a Time of Tribulation/qliyewv <2347> becomes, which not has-become from to become a Nation, until the Time, that. [Matt 24:21/Mark 13:19/Reve 7:14]

Matt 24:21 "For then shall be Tribulation/qliyiV <2347> Great, the such as not has become from beginning of world til of the now, neither not no may be becoming [Dan 12:1/Rev 7:14]

http://www.christianforums.com/t7358354/
End of Tribulation is near! Wrath about to begin!
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

There were no priests of the Most High of the nation when they came out of Egypt. The whole nation was to be a kingdom of priests with God as the King. But they refuse to hear His voice. How will He rule if they won't hear?

There was the Melchizedek priesthood and other priests like Moses' father in law, but none in the nation who came out of Egypt. Just like us. No priests of the Most High, except for Jesus Christ our High Priest of Melchizedek priesthood. We too are asked by Him to hear His voice, but we have come to Mt. Zion not Sinai.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private


Understood. The point under discussion is what happened when the people refused to hear the voice of God because of fear/could not bear?

God established the Levitical priesthood and called the rest the children of Israel.

Nearly all of the NT churches use the OT model as you point out. BUT, the model now is Christ Jesus the High Priest, the King of the kingdom of priests that believers are. We choose to hear HIS VOICE. We have come to Zion. Not Sinai of fear, trembling, and intermediaries.
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Standing Up,

Our conversation is going nowhere. It doesn't concern the OP, and its contrived.

Back to the Bishops having the right to create an office.

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I concur, back to the OP


I had to so everyone else does too.
I say that with respect to all.

Bless you!

Still haven't voted?

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

christianmomof3

pursuing Christ
Apr 12, 2005
12,798
1,230
62
in Christ
✟40,925.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

The book of Acts (14:23), and also 1 Tim. (ch. 3) and 1 Pet. (ch. 5) do show us that there were overseers or elders appointed by the apostles for the churches to care for leading and shepherding the saints. 1 Tim ch. 3 also shows us that they had deacons who were serving ones under the leadership of the overseers or elders. Beyond that there were no other "offices" mentioned in the churches and there was no "heirarchical system" laid out or commanded in the Bible.

It is true that such a system did begin during the first century of the church, but that does not mean that it was what the Lord wanted. In fact, looking at the verses in Revelation about the Nicolaitians, we see that such a system separating clergy and laity is actually repugnant to the Lord.

Rev. 2:6 But this you have, that you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Nicolaism (also Nicholaism, Nicolationism, or Nicolaitanism) is a Christian heresy whose adherents are called nicolaitans, nicolaitanes, or nicolaites. Nico means "conquer" in Greek, Laitan refers to lay people, or laity, hence the word could be taken to mean "Lay conquerors" or Conquerors of the Lay People;

Cyrus Scofield, in his Notes on the Bible, following dispensationalist thought, suggests that the Seven Letters in Revelation foretell the various eras of Christian history, and that "Nicolaitans" "refers to the earliest form of the notion of a priestly order, or 'clergy,' which later divided an equal brotherhood into 'priests' and 'laity.'"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaism



In the New Testament, God has returned to His original intention that He has made all believers in Christ priests as seen in the following verses:

Rev. 1:6 And made us a kingdom, priests to His God and Father, to Him be the glory and the might forever and ever. Amen.
1 Pet. 2:5 You yourselves also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house into a holy priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
9 But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people acquired for a possession, so that you may tell out the of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light;
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

The information about the Nicolaitan's is totally incorrect.

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

christianmomof3

pursuing Christ
Apr 12, 2005
12,798
1,230
62
in Christ
✟40,925.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The information about the Nicolaitan's is totally incorrect.

Forgive me...
How are you feeling?
I hope you are doing well.
My 7 year old daughter has a stomach virus or flu or something - she was up at 4 am this morning throwing up and is now running fever.


As far as the information about the Nicolaitans - I did not expect you would agree with it, but what about the other verses and examples from the Bible?

As far as your original question - who would give "rights" to bishops (which I think is the word "overseers")?
The church is the Body of Christ.
He is the Head of it.
Paul showed us that Christ speaks to us and acts through the many redeemed and regenerated members of His Body.
The Bible is accepted by most Christians as the inspired word of God.
Other "Traditions" are not accepted by all Christians as being directed or inspired by God.

I would think the only One who could give any "rights" would be the Lord Himself and according to the Bible, He desires for all of His redeemed and regenerated believers to be a nation of priests - we all should be those who live Christ and dispense Him to others. The priesthood should not be an "office" for only a few select men.
We should all live as priests to our God.

 
Reactions: Rebekah30
Upvote 0

Rebekah30

Regular Member
Apr 9, 2007
1,561
1,906
floating on Ceres
✟28,085.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
CM expressed what I say as well

Praying for you daughter CM
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest


Absent historical references, and given an additional reference to the Nikolatians several verses later (around 15), one is hard pressed to derive a clear reference to such a system (a sort of elitism) being referred to in Revelation. Why wouldn't it be equally likely to posit that the term "Nikolaitans" means the 'people conquered' - indicating a usurpation of a "proper order" of some sort. In fact, in the first reference, it is said there a Nikolaitians among them. Is the among in reference to a small community (ie, a house Church)? If that is the case, it seems unlikely that this is explicitly a reference to an "elitist priesthood". In the second reference, it is said that there is a "small thing" against them - Nikolaitians. Again, iirc, these are "among" them - not all of them. The question again is - are we talking about a large Church community, many communities, or a small one (house Church).

In addition, why not derive teachings from the etymology of NT names in general ? As before, Nikodemos means nearly the same (demos meaning people, from whence we get the term democracy) - and Stephen means "crown", etc. Assuming that Revelation was authored by John, was he not again capable of adding (in reference to certain terms) "being interpreted as", as he did in the Gospel ?
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Chesterton
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I'm doing better... thanks for asking.

Sorry to hear about your daughter. Make the sign of the cross over her for me.

If you want to know the truth about Deacon Nicolas and his followers I will be glad to share the story. It's quite ugly and not for young ears.

He was a former Pagan who worshiped with the Romans. Fornication was at the center of the scandal. Enough said.

How do I know this? Surely it's proper to ask that... Well, unfortunately, Deacon Nicolas was of The Church of Antioch, the Church that I was baptized into, and am studying under.

I hope you understand that I am not arguing against the priesthood of believers. We know this to be true. It is the Orthodox teaching.

Bear with me, I'm typing out a text from the Orthodox Study Bible and will have it ready to post shortly.

I hope that it will explain better than my feeble attempt.

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
From the Orthodox Christian Study Bible:


Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Perhaps the strongest early reference outside the New Testament to the presence of the four orders in Church government occurs in the writings of Ignatius, bishop of Antioch from AD67-107, the very heart of the New Testament era.
Did Ignatius write anything on the destruction of Jerusalem in 70ad?

http://www.christianforums.com/t7270786/#post51683566

Just curious as I view that event as the one showing in Revelation

Matt 24:19 "Woe yet to those in belly having and to those suckling in those the days!
20 Be ye praying yet that no may be becoming/genhtai <1096> (5638) the flight of ye of winter neither a Sabbath".

The Destruction of Jerusalem

.............The day on which Titus encompassed Jerusalem, was the feast of the Passover. At this season multitudes came up from all the surrounding country, and from distant parts, to keep the festival..................

....... This memorable siege terminated on the eighth day of the ninth month, A.D. 70 : its duration was nearly five months, the Romans having invested the city on the fourteenth day of the fourth month, preceeding
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.