The question Evolutionsists can't answer

[Jet Black]

You dont need to show your symptoms in this thread. We didnt ask for it. All we asked was to tell what evolved, desire for [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] or [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] itself.

we told you and you ignored it.

 

[Gracchus]

I am now exiting this thread.
It was designed to show forth the circular reasoning of the evolutionist. Such has been achieved, and also again high-lighted in my last 2 lengthy posts (I believe 244, 245).

The evolutionists have not, in over 25 pages, answered the question.
They have only begged it.

Creationist tactic #193.c.25 When ad hoc, ad hominem, outright lies, and straw men fail, proclaim victory and exit stage left with your tail between your legs.

 

[Sopharos]

Creationist tactic #193.c.25 When ad hoc, ad hominem, outright lies, and straw men fail, proclaim victory and exit stage left with your tail between your legs.

Don't forget Broken Records argument.

 

[Ryal Kane]

A: What's 1 + 1?
B: 2
A: But what's 1 + 1?
B: Er. 2
A: Sounding a little confused aren't you? You can't answer 1 + 1?
B: I told you, it's 2!
A: No you're getting angry at me because I'm smarter. You don't even know 1 + 1.
C: Yeah! B is so stupid! You rock A!
B: 1 + 1 is 2
A: Since you can't answer I'm going home.
B:

 

[Jet Black]

C: Yeah! B is so stupid! You rock A!

lol

 

[Jet Black]

what happened to colossians' "10" thread?

 

[JohnR7]

what happened to colossians' "10" thread?

Who knows, this board has been shut down and turned into a tea party.
Would you like one lumps or two with your tea?
Would you care for a biscuit to go with that?

 

[Jet Black]

Who knows, this board has been shut down and turned into a tea party.
Would you like one lumps or two with your tea?
Would you care for a biscuit to go with that?

it seems to have appeared again.... was that a cat I saw there, the one with the large grin?

 

[DJ_Ghost]

I am now exiting this thread.

Funny I thought you might. The fact you had not appeared in about 48 hours after my argument analysis suggested you had popped off to do a bit of quick reading to see if you could find a flaw. Didn’t think you would be able to.

It was designed to show forth the circular reasoning of the evolutionist.

Fallacy of claiming prejudice (again)

Such has been achieved,

Fallacy of misrepresentation (again)

Running out of ideas? Not surprised there is, as far as I can tell, no fallacy left unused. You didn’t have the Guinness book of records in your sights did you?

The evolutionists have not, in over 25 pages, answered the question.
They have only begged it.

Actually it was answered at least 3 times by me alone. You then expanded the question (Ooooh look the Fallacy of Changing meanings! You squeezed that in as well, well done).

And once more;

STOP MISUSING THE TERM “BEGS THE QUESTION” its driving me nuts. The term you are looking for is;

“they have used a tautologies argument”.

To Beg a question means to present a statement is such a way that a question naturally comes to mind. let me use an example;

“It is extensively believed that Lord Byron did not actually write the Novella “The Vampire””

This begs the question,

“The who did write the Novella “The Vampire?””

However

“Lord Byron wrote the Novella “The Vampire” because he is the author credited with writing it” is a tautologies statement.

Please learn the difference. I hope that is clear.

Ghost

 

[Jet Black]

I'm racking my brain to remember the other guy who kept misusing logic and words like irony/parody in the way colossians was. Nathan Poe might remember....

 

[Ishmael Borg]

I'm racking my brain to remember the other guy who kept misusing logic and words like irony/parody in the way colossians was. Nathan Poe might remember....

Follower of Christ?

 

[PhantomLlama]

I'm racking my brain to remember the other guy who kept misusing logic and words like irony/parody in the way colossians was. Nathan Poe might remember....

I'm like you. I know there was one, but I can't remember his name.

I'll go on a forum trawl.

 

[Jet Black]

Follower of Christ?

no, it was one of the faux-intellectuals.

 

[DJ_Ghost]

no, it was one of the faux-intellectuals.

Yes it has been bugging me as well, trying to recall his name.

Ghost

 

[Orbyss]

And I just have to say it-- denying evolution is about the most ignorant thing I can think of when it is, if you look, right in front of your face.

 

[Sopharos]

Indeed, such debating tactics (broken records, flame-baiting, smug arrogance, etc) are also familiar to me. I debated this whole thread thinking to myself, "Sambo83? Is that you??!!"

 

[Orbyss]

...who?

 

[Bushido216]

Indeed, such debating tactics (broken records, flame-baiting, smug arrogance, etc) are also familiar to me. I debated this whole thread thinking to myself, "Sambo83? Is that you??!!"

Ooohhh... tip of the tongue! Someone search the boards for long posts from six months ago, we might find 'em.

 

[PhantomLlama]

Is it montalban?

Looking through the archives brings back memories. Napajohn, TruthTraveller (one of whose threads won the 2003 Total Logical Disconnect award), Durang0, Obediah001...

Where have all the good creationists gone?

 

[Obertray]

2003 Total Logical Disconnect award

That's an interesting award you have there...