• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I am not "anti-science", I am anti-fraudulent science.

Would you define fraudulant science as anything that contradicts your personal religious beliefs?

In your entire life, have you ever accepted scientific findings that conflicted with your religious beliefs?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

And, some folks will believe anything that brings them comfort.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Have you taken scientists at their word regarding the theory of evolution?

Ever hear of francis collins? The devout christian, physician, geneticist and former head of the human genome project?

Look him up and tell us what his opinion is on the evidence for the theory of evolution.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

LOL
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,143
✟349,282.00
Faith
Atheist
Really? There is no dishonesty that needs to be recognized and addressed in mainstream science? Interesting.
Who told you that? There certainly is dishonesty that needs to be recognized in mainstream science; by all means go after it. Just try not to confuse predictions with evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
No, I didn't miss it. However, I can give you many other quotes that question what he's claiming.

Ahh yes, you want to go digging in the creationist quote mine. Pull little nuggets way out of context, and quotes that have nothing to do with the hominid fossil record. Am I right?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
My question remains, are scientists manufacturing their own evidence to fill the substantial gaps in the fossil record?

No. The article you pointed to has scientists using real fossils as evidence. They then draw tentative conclusions from those real fossils. That is how science works.

Where are the actual fossils?

I already showed you the fossils.

There should be thousands of them.

Can you show us that there aren't thousands if not millions of hominid fossils? Are you telling us that you have searched every cubic foot of sediment on the Earth, and there are only a handful of hominid fossils on the entire Earth?

And yet, even with all those billions of years, adequate fossil evidence to support Darwinian evolution has not been found, to this day.

It has been found.



(It's also worth noting that Darwin himself saw major problems with this)

It's also worth noting that Darwin concluded just the opposite.

"The several difficulties here discussed, namely our not finding in the successive formations infinitely numerous transitional links between the many species which now exist or have existed; the sudden manner in which whole groups of species appear in our European formations; the almost entire absence, as at present known, of fossiliferous formations beneath the Silurian strata, are all undoubtedly of the gravest nature. We see this in the plainest manner by the fact that all the most eminent palaeontologists, namely Cuvier, Owen, Agassiz, Barrande, Falconer, E. Forbes, &c., and all our greatest geologists, as Lyell, Murchison, Sedgwick, &c., have unanimously, often vehemently, maintained the immutability of species. But I have reason to believe that one great authority, Sir Charles Lyell, from further reflexion entertains grave doubts on this subject. I feel how rash it is to differ from these great authorities, to whom, with others, we owe all our knowledge. Those who think the natural geological record in any degree perfect, and who do not attach much weight to the facts and arguments of other kinds even in this volume, will undoubtedly at once reject my theory. For my part, following out Lyell's metaphor, I look at the natural geological record, as a history of the world imperfectly kept, and written in a changing dialect; of this history we possess the last volume alone, relating only to two or three countries. Of this volume, only here and there a short chapter has been preserved; and of each page, only here and there a few lines. Each word of the slowly-changing language, in which the history is supposed to be written, being more or less different in the interrupted succession of chapters, may represent the apparently abruptly changed forms of life, entombed in our consecutive, but widely separated formations. On this view, the difficulties above discussed are greatly diminished, or even disappear."--Charles Darwin, "Origin of Species"
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/origin/chapter9.html

Darwin discovered that the imperfection of the geologic record was responsible for the lack of billions of finely graded transitional fossils. He solved the problem. The problem you are trying to raise was solved over 150 years ago by Darwin himself.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
I "dismissed" their "findings" because they are not findings at all, they are speculation based on fragmentary evidence.

Where did you demonstrate this? These hominid fossils don't look fragmentary to me, and they form a continuous temporal sequence as Gould already described.





Scientists have admitted the severe problems with the fossil record themselves. Would you like me to share some statements many scientists have made?

As they apply to the hominid fossil record? Let's see them. Also, supply a link to the entire article so that we can check for context.

ONE picture is hardly conclusive.

The point being that no amount of fossils will ever convince you. You stick your head in the sand, and hope that the evidence goes away.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,670
8,967
52
✟383,229.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
That's a caricature of Christian theology, one that treats the sin and brokenness in the world dismissively.

Is it, though?

What happens to someone who does not accept the gift?
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This conversation is off topic.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Is it, though?

What happens to someone who does not accept the gift?

They perish.

To perish does not imply being tormented forever, it implies death or lack of life. God is life, so if you do not accept life given through Christ Jesus, then you will perish. It's pretty simple, God won't force you against your will to live forever in bliss, free from all evil, this is a gift that He offers through His Son.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

You are right Jason. Thank you.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,143
✟349,282.00
Faith
Atheist
This is His hidden gift - the gift of oblivion rather than the torture of eternal bliss with no reprieve
 
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
No gnashing of teeth? Good then!
 
Upvote 0

SteveB28

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2015
4,032
2,426
96
✟21,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist

Please keep commenting!

Such horrendous scientific ignorance should help those who are wavering in their beliefs, to land in the side of rationality and reason!

For Petes sake woman, do an Internet search on 'evidence for speciation' before you embarrass yourself further!
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Oh, I'm not embarrassed, I can assure you.

And no, I will not be commenting further. I am done playing games.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
FYI, there is a "Christians Only" section for creationism on CF. You might find it to be a little more agreeable?

I have had quite enough of non-Christians suggesting that Christians should stay in the "Christian-only" sections of this forum. In case you have forgotten, this entire site is a Christian forum. If you don't want to encounter Christians and their view points, why in the world are you here? There are many forums for Atheists on the Internet for atheist viewpoints to be shared. This forum (and it's general sections) are meant to be an outreach for non-Christians who have honest questions and concerns regarding the Christian faith.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.