- Oct 14, 2015
- 6,133
- 3,090
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nuclear, chemical, biological weapons.Examples?
"Life originated from inorganic matter." Science cannot prove it, test it, or even recreate it. Yet if you don't believe in God, you have to have faith that it is true.
Sorry, which legal jurisdiction are you talking about?
A lot of us live in different jurisdictions, anyway.
I asked for examples and no scientific theories are not presented as fact but very well founded theories.
"Life originated from inorganic matter ". It has not been proven true, however you have to believe it in order to believe that there is no God. It requires you to have faith in science to believe that all organic life originated from inorganic matter.
I asked for examples and no scientific theories are not presented as fact but very well founded theories.
No you didn't.
You're not actually bothering yourself with what Hitler actually said and did.
No I don't need to read the bible again, Hitler did talk about being a Christian. Yahweh would have killed me if I had lived in the old testament and Jesus says he'll burn me in a stove one day so.... put it together for yourself. The bible says god is going to kill more people that Hitler ever hoped to and that he already has.
As I've repeatedly told you... my moral system is that those things are wrong. Subjective morality simply acknowledges that my feelings are the basis. My system isn't allowing other people to have different moral systems... its just acknowledging that I have nothing but my feelings. Your moral system would let god do anything he wants... that's bad and immoral.
I have not insulted you and I have not attacked you... I said you are selfish and deluded if your basis of rape being wrong is because it tarnishes gods image rather than how destructive to people those things are.
I have told you over and over that murder and rape are wrong... I'm not sure why you can't get that.
I then add that I use my feelings as the basis... and then you go back to my system making those things ok and it just makes no sense. You're just helpless to believe in right and wrong without a god and that would make you a sociopath if that ever happened. I'm sorry but it's true. I value humans, you value god's authority.
Okay, thanks; I was just seeking clarification of your earlier phrase "the kind of court system we have" the court system we have already.I don't understand your question. I live in the usa
This is not about "Gaps". I am not saying that: if science can't explain it, it must be God". It is about how people have faith in scientific "theories" and believe them to be true without any proof. So don't throw that strawman argument to distract away from the point.In your world then, if science does not have all the answers yet, then it must be a God?
Hold onto your hat, because science keeps closing those gaps and I see no reason this doesn't continue into the future.
Bwahahaha! Your Joking right?Which have to be used in a harmful way by whom?
I wonder how one can affirm something, if the language of affirmation is denied. (This is more or less a central point of Wittgenstein.)Actually the belief that god is not real requires no other belief at all.
Strawman arguement.And what of the radical that uses religion to harm others? What should come of that religion?
You are creating a strawman in regards to science. Likely, because it helps you hold onto your personal faith.
Does science scare you?
I refuse to continue going back and forth with you over this.
Actually, I am very bothered by what Hitler said and did.
Fair enough, no one can make you read the Bible of course. However, you are completely misrepresenting what it actually says.
A subjective morality based on "feelings" allows people to do whatever they want. And it allows for the standards of right and wrong to change with someone's emotions. If you acknowledge that YOUR standards are based on your "feelings", you must then acknowledge that the same is true for everyone else and that no person's feelings or morality is any better than any one else's. Therefore, people can kill if it feels right to them, and they have not done anything wrong in doing so.
You've clearly misunderstood everything I've been saying. Oh well.
What makes murder and rape wrong? In your view morality is subjective remember?
I value humans because I believe we were all created by God in His image and because I believe He teaches us HIS standard of how we are to treat each other.
Subjective morality values no one, it says, in effect, anything goes, as long as it feels right, do it.
As I have said many times; I see no reason to believe there is a God, but I may be wrong.
Which have to be used in a harmful way by whom?
And you were wrong about what science has claimed as absolute fact.
Okay, thanks; I was just seeking clarification of your earlier phrase "the kind of court system we have" the court system we have already.
Round the world, the systems and practices and assumptions - some of them ethical - underlying the workings of those systems are very diverse.
Bad science does not cause car accidents, bad design and improper use of science causes failure.
In regards to chemo, science tells us in advance chemo has side effects, but when someone has terminal cancer, it is worth those side effects to use that treatment.
I wonder how one can affirm something, if the language of affirmation is denied. (This is more or less a central point of Wittgenstein.)
Hebrews 11 says: "He that comes to God, must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them than diligently seek Him."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?