The premise of evolution blows itself up as an attempt to deny scripture

[tyronem]

If there is one thing I've learned about evolutionists (especially atheist) is that they deny the biblical term Kind, mock it and claim it is irrelevant and not scientific. They say evolution proves that things don't produce after their kind

However the example of the premise of evolution is as follows:

Dinosaurs did not turn into birds, birds are dinosaurs, they just look different, so if you lived for 64 million years back in "the day" you would have called them dinosaurs and if you saw birds today you would say, oh them they are dinosaurs.

Now as illogical as this is, it actually fits into the premise they are trying so desperately to avoid, animals bringing forth after their kind. They claim birds are dinosaurs therefore we can take the biblical presupposition and say well ok, but you realise you have not avoided the Bible with your explanation, you have only affirmed it because dinosaurs have in their world view brought forth after their kind and still are dinosaurs, they just look different.

It just goes to show, no matter how much people try to avoid scripture, it turns out scripture is always right.

 

[Greg1234]

If there is one thing I've learned about evolutionists (especially atheist) is that they deny the biblical term Kind, mock it

What else can they do now? The entire Darwinian field is built around a mechanism that cannot do what they think it can.

Adaptation isn't caused by random changes but an intelligent mechanism. That mechanism, tested for over a century, is clearly limited. Exactly how many years do you have to spend opening and closing a car door before you realize that these changes cannot turn it into a submarine?

and claim it is irrelevant and not scientific.

Probably to their scientific community, not in the ID scientific community.