Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. I asked you to consider the historical references directly cited within. It would save me time from having to re-post them here.YOU want me to read a SDA website to prove YOUR theology?????
Why do you keep insisting that Jesus had sin - each time I post that scripture says He did not?
I find your logic illusive at that point.
A separate thread on why you feel that either Hebrew is not a high context language or why you feel Jesus had sinned - would be in order if either of those are your claim
No. I asked you to consider the historical references directly cited within. It would save me time from having to re-post them here.
Yep, and when my wife make a grocery list (Intelligent Design -- chronological) and then re-writes it according to the store aisles (Intelligent Design) and throws away the first, -- apparently SHE's SMARTER THAN GOD! Because GOD is often confused, disoriented, distracted, or simply random -- and seldom uses Intelligent Design in HIS explanations to his creation.
And of course, who would be so gullible to think that our present "kingdom" is "divided" between three superpowers and the United Nations. (Ref. 2:41) What rubbish.
MOST of us are -- Smarter than GOD!
DaDad
The 70th week still ahs yet to be fulfilled, cannot happen until the prince to come, the Antichrist, is set up and tries to destroy Israel!
FINALLY, someone who has some perception.
CEV Footnote:There is absolutely NOTHING in Daniel 9 which remotely supports a "Jesus" fulfillment. The text, context, and history all refute any such premise.
- 9.25 the Chosen Leader: Or “a chosen leader.” In Hebrew the word “chosen” means “to pour oil (on someone’s head).” In Old Testament times it was the custom to pour oil on a person’s head when that person was chosen to be a priest or a king.
... Now there are a couple of "kings" which DO fulfill the text, context, and history, -- but you won't find them in ANY commentary. Perhaps the commentators should have followed the angel's instructions in 12:4 & 9.
Thanks,
DaDad
No. I asked you to consider the historical references directly cited within. It would save me time from having to re-post them here.
Then they are not serious students of scripture, nor history (and that includes the Reformation) and I pity them. All seeking truth should at least consider it, even if scanning it.
This is true, but as I said, the WTS/JW borrowed that doctrine from the Reformation, and yet twisted it, to reduce Michael/Jesus to a mere creature, as Roman Catholicism does. WTS/JW have a mixed theology, half Roman Catholicism, half Reformation. That is demonstrated in the material provided.
I agree! JESUS HAD NO SIN!!!!!!!!
If Jesus had any sin then He could not be the Saviour and the Scriptures would be a lie which makes God a liar resulting in all of us not being saved at all.
No, incorrect. The "prince that shall come", was Jesus (the word is only used for Jesus in Daniel).Correct!...
Have some one else read it to you, enlarge the font. Enough excuses. You have read plenty on these forums and spent enough time typing.No sir, I do not agree. Some of us are elderly and do not have the ability or the eye sight to go through such a porifera of info.
That cannot be correct for several scriptural reasons,
[1] the 70 weeks (490 years) is simply a subsection of the greater 2,300, as per (Daniel 9:23,24, "the vision", "determined"), which would mean, that after the 490 years, 1810 years remain to be accounted for (Daniel 8:13,14,26; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, etc)
[2] Jesus fulfilled the requirements in Daniel 9:24, "to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness":
Everlasting righteousness began with Jesus.
Jesus/Michael stood up in AD 34 [Acts 7:55-56 KJB], the end of the 70 weeks, in Daniel 9, and thus the close of the probation of the Jews as a nation, the sanhedrin, having rejected the Head and the body. He will so stand again [Daniel 12:1; Luke 13:25; Revelation 22:11 KJB, etc]
AD 27 + 3 1/2 = AD 31; crucifixion. The first of the final week of the 70 weeks, as Jesus told Peter [Matthew 18:22 KJB]
AD 31 + 3 1/2 = AD 34; Stephen martyred. End of the 70 weeks, as we see in Hebrews 2:3 KJB
Parallels [the short version, two rainbows]:
Jesus in AD 27 Anointed with the Holy Ghost, ministry 3 1/2 years, miracles, taken captive AD 31, rejected by the sanhedrin, condemned to death, dies outside the city
.
It's not MY logic, it's YOURS.
ONE at a TIME!
There is no need to overpower us with words.
But it would take me a lot of time to read it and find it and since you wanted it know then you should post it.
Nope. Daniel wrote that he perceived (biyn -- Ref. 1 Kings 3, simple wisdom -shama vs Solomon wisdom - biyn) the Books, which turns out to the be Book of Psalms. So rather than guessing, you too can discover the actual prophecy and interpretation.70th week refers to the time of Jacob' troubles, to Israel under wrath of Antichrist, yet to happen!
Please do a word search on mashiyach (H4899).Lev 4:3 says nothing about Christ being a sinner. How is that not obvious? ...
That's not what the angle instructed (Ref. 12:4 & 9), and it might be perilous to disobey an angel.... the 70 weeks of Daniel 9 ended 2000 years ago ...
Why would you dilute the literal text by using a translation? Don't you like what GOD actually said? Maybe GOD's words don't fit a given commentator's presentation, but given the choice, I'll stick with what GOD actually said: mashiyach.Let's consider the text in English:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?