The Political Theories Underlying the Disinformation Debate

[Michie]

Contemporary debates about “disinformation” point back to a fundamental tension in Enlightenment philosophy.

The debate over disinformation today reveals a fundamental divide not merely between Republicans and Democrats, but between two philosophies of human nature that both trace their lineage to the Enlightenment.

Those advocating government suppression of disinformation believe that individuals are products of their environment, molded by the inputs they receive. Confident that society can be perfected by carefully controlled influences, they envision a government capable of shaping an informational landscape that fosters collective well-being. Opponents, however, see this ambition as profoundly misguided. They believe in the individual’s capacity for self-direction and doubt the wisdom giving the state the authority to impose or encourage such controls. This clash is not just political; it is philosophical, reflecting a deep-seated disagreement about man’s potential and his autonomy.

Continued below.

The Political Theories Underlying the Disinformation Debate – John O. McGinnis

Contemporary debates about “disinformation” point back to a fundamental tension in Enlightenment philosophy.

lawliberty.org

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

The whole liberal/conservative thing goes back to the enlightenment also especially when it come to Biblical hermeneutics.

On this one I doubt the "individual’s capacity for self-direction". Don't we have enough evidence that such capacity is lacking. That realization and disappointment leads some from the enlightenments liberalism or humanism (whatever we want To call it0 to Neo-conservativism.

 

[eleos1954]

Contemporary debates about “disinformation” point back to a fundamental tension in Enlightenment philosophy.

The debate over disinformation today reveals a fundamental divide not merely between Republicans and Democrats, but between two philosophies of human nature that both trace their lineage to the Enlightenment.

Those advocating government suppression of disinformation believe that individuals are products of their environment, molded by the inputs they receive. Confident that society can be perfected by carefully controlled influences, they envision a government capable of shaping an informational landscape that fosters collective well-being. Opponents, however, see this ambition as profoundly misguided. They believe in the individual’s capacity for self-direction and doubt the wisdom giving the state the authority to impose or encourage such controls. This clash is not just political; it is philosophical, reflecting a deep-seated disagreement about man’s potential and his autonomy.

Continued below.

The Political Theories Underlying the Disinformation Debate – John O. McGinnis

Contemporary debates about “disinformation” point back to a fundamental tension in Enlightenment philosophy.

lawliberty.org

Nobody is the arbiter of truth ... especially our government. If we do not have free speech ... then our rights to question things are eliminated and we are then totally controlled and have no recourse of any kind .... a type of slavery.