PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Whether or not their ideal of god exists is inconclusive, we can't honestly make any claim as to whether or not it exists.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All I did was ask a question.
Has Christianity changed the meaning of the word "exist"? or does it still mean exist? if not their God does not "exist".
Especially if you don't know the meaning of the word "Exist".Whether or not their ideal of god exists is inconclusive, we can't honestly make any claim as to whether or not it exists.
Especially if you don't know the meaning of the word "Exist".
Why could it happen one day and not now? will there be any more evidence one day? science can read the signs of ancient floods today so what will change in the future? why do you keep going on about this? it's a dead end.
May I suggest that you get out more and read material other than religious pamphlets, although I can easily understand why you don't.
I have read many scientific articles describing significant changes in many of the conclusions of science. I have never read of a significant change in the biblical record of past events, only new discoveries that support those accounts. Science purports to always being about the business of falsifying it's own conclusions; they are just not in any big hurry to do so.
If I were a betting person I would bet that the science that attempts to debunk the bible will change in the face of new discoveries (that were there all the time) sometime in the future. Of this I have great faith.
Could you point to one of those new discoveries that have supported those biblical accounts?I have never read of a significant change in the biblical record of past events, only new discoveries that support those accounts.
If you believe something without sufficient reason to believe it you are being irrational be it subjective or objective.
Science doesn't debunk the bible people debunk the bible, they may use science to do it, science is only a set of tools.I have read many scientific articles describing significant changes in If I were a betting person I would bet that the science that attempts to debunk the bible will change in the face of new discoveries
Please point to one thing, just one.Rationalists believe things without evidence too.
Science doesn't debunk the bible people debunk the bible, they may use science to do it, science is only a set of tools.
Science doesn't debunk the bible people debunk the bible, they may use science to do it, science is only a set of tools.
Please point to one thing, just one.
Exactly, it's there to do a job.Science is like a gun, it requires a person to shoot it at another person to kill them.
false claims eventually debunk themselves in due time.
All it requires is; a healthy dose of objective evidence and an objective observer to acknowledge the evidence.
Exactly, it's there to do a job.
Could you point to one of those new discoveries that have supported those biblical accounts?
I would be very interested to read one, thanks.
And what point would that be?
When you take advantage (every day of your life) of what modern science has provided you, do you look at as someone pointing a gun and killing someone?
It's perfectly rational to believe we are not the only life forms in existence when there are:Sure, SETI.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?