The New Kent Hovind?

[speakout]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Taftv6yrd_Y

This came via Dawkinswatch, a discernment website.

I know he is going to get love, and how are doing ?

I like his style, and since kids are destroying evolution, this must be irritating to new atheists.

Tell what you think, I know you will start by sending hate mail, funny how some things never change.

I love you stop!

 

[atomweaver]

I like his style, and since kids are destroying evolution, this must be irritating to new atheists.

Ahh, I think now I understand better why creationists are trying to get their religion into schools. See, you seem to think that kids can "destroy evolution". Too funny... If its even possible, that could only be done by a well-trained person with extensive background in the biological sciences, and a massive mountain of evidence which is not already explained by the model for the even-more-massive mountain of evidence already collected.

Too bad, speakout, as long as ToE continues to produce better medicines, and creationists continue to plug their orifices and deny the reality found in every genome, the ToE isn't going to be destroyed by anything...

Kids destroying evolution. That's some fabulous internet right there... Its great to start the day with a good belly-laugh, thanks!

 

[TheManeki]

This came via Dawkinswatch, a discernment website.

I could be wrong, but I believe "Dawkinswatch" is speakout's little blog. If so, I have to wonder if speakout decided to give his own work such a grandiloquent designation, or if there is some accrediting board involved.

 

[Cabal]

Venomfagx? Please. Post something that hasn't been debunked by half the internet.

FAIL

 

[Bombila]

That is so biologically ignorant it hurts. If this kid, like many before him, manages to get an education over the next few years, these videos are going to follow him and haunt him for the rest of his life. Someone will likely play them at his bachelor party. If he's lucky, he'll look different enough as he matures for no one to recognize him.

 

[Cabal]

As well as telling him he phails hard, someone should also tell him to SHAVE

 

[BrainHertz]

http://lolcats.com/view/501/

 

[Tammisto]

Venomfagx? Please. Post something that hasn't been debunked by half the internet.

FAIL

You are far too moddest in your claims, its closer to two thirds of the intertet.

 

[consol]

Why do creationists only tell us how bad evolution is,
why do they NEVER tell us how good creationism is?
is that because creationism has NOTHING going for it? or what?
and what does evolution being wrong have to do with creationism?
does evolution being wrong make creationism right?
why do they NEVER tell us why we should believe in creationism? NEVER.

Could creationists PLEASE tell us WHY they chose creationism? (FORGET EVOLUTION) what attracted them to creationism?
did it make more sense? or did it just require less effort? please tell us why?

 

[Technocrat2010]

Speakout, if Dawkinswatch is your blog, remember me? I'm Dawkinswatchwatcher -
http://dawkinswatch.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/evolutionist-how-objective-have-they-been/

 

[AintNoMonkey]

Careful... He's going right for the buttocks.

Not a Strong Christian.

 

[Washington]

A challenge to speakout




As a god-fearing Christian, can you tell the truth?


Confirm or deny: Dawkinswatch is your blog.​

 

[TheManeki]

I'm not totally certain if Speakout also writes the Dawkinswatch blog, but a quick search of CF posts regarding Dawkinswatch indicates that he is the only one who pastes posts from the blog here at CF.

This is, of course, not sufficient proof in itself. Speakout could just be a Dawkinswatch fanboy. One thing that makes me doubt that Speakout and Dawkinswatch are the same is that Dawkinswatch seems to have a slightly better grasp of English spelling and grammar. But maybe someone edits the blog posts before they go up, and not the CF posts.

EDIT: Looks like Speakout does at least claim to be the author of Dawkinswatch.

I put this up in my blog Dawkinswatchand it created confusion but this is an explanation of gnosticism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGsMHr0rRh0

 

[pgp_protector]

So if he's the new Kent Hovinad, will he also be going to the Federal Correctional Institution for tax offenses, and other charges ?

 

[Cabal]

He's already been banned from youtube for posting Muslim hate-speech (which I suspect was yet another typical Christian persecution-complex whinge).

Although in many ways I prefer him to Hovind, at least VenomfangX doesn't whinge about his tax dollars being used to teach evolution EVERY FIVE MINUTES.

 

[MoonLancer]

I wouldn't say that exactly. While venomfang is a jerkoff of the worst kind, as he deletes comments from his videos and turns off voteing after he gives it 5 stars, many people from youtube have gotten removed through criticizing Muslims. In this case i think their really is a double standard. One could say the same thing about Christians and it would not result in removal or suspension.

to be clear i think they both are alittle messed up.

 

[Washington]

EDIT: Looks like Speakout does at least claim to be the author of Dawkinswatch.

That's good enough for me.

 

[Tammisto]

He's already been banned from youtube for posting Muslim hate-speech (which I suspect was yet another typical Christian persecution-complex whinge).

Although in many ways I prefer him to Hovind, at least VenomfangX doesn't whinge about his tax dollars being used to teach evolution EVERY FIVE MINUTES.

Concidering what has been branded hate speech by muslims it could be just as innocent as those danish cartoons, but since i havent seen the video myself cant be sure, but anyway his baning, however stupid his videos, does not seem justified to me.

 

[Paconious]

So people can get outed from youtube for saying absurdities about Islam yet Pat Robertson is still allowed to broadcast his craziness..

Crazy

 

[Dal M.]

The creationists have selected a new champion, and his name is VenomFangX - a hateful little teenager who's easily confused into believing that Photoshop contest entries are actually evidence of creationism.

Also: discernment website = maximum lulz.