• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Manipulated Man.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trevorocity

Regular Member
Jun 30, 2007
1,130
146
48
✟24,460.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
LMBO! ^_^
That pertains to women as well mpok :)

Im more of a leg and face lover myself, not into breasts (yeah, I dont get it either)

Ok, enough derailment?
Back on topic, yes?

Always been a back and shoulders man myself. The womenz just don't cut it in that respect.
 
Upvote 0

stan1980

Veteran
Jan 7, 2008
3,238
261
✟27,040.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm finding it hard to get my head around this manipulation thing people talk about. Obviously, some are better looking than others, some have better personalities than others, some are more intelligent than others, some are richer than others. Of course it is all subjective (apart from maybe wealth), but are we saying you shouldn't use your best attributes to your advantage, or are we saying that you are not 'allowed' to use certain attributes? That would be ridiculous, because how do we decide what is fair and what isn't. We aren't all the same, we never will be.

In the case of a popular stereotype, pretty young girl gets married to a wealthy old man, who exactly is manipulating who? Most relationships are mutually beneficial otherwise there wouldn't be a relationship, and it is not really mine or your place to decide what is 'right' and what is 'wrong'. If you really feel your own relationship isn't 'right' then I can only suggest talking about it, and if that still doesn't help, cutting your ties.

Now if we are making an argument against people being deceptive, then you might have some sort of case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cantata
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Im more of a leg and face lover myself, not into breasts (yeah, I dont get it either)

When I was a teenager I oddly lusted after the backs of girls' knees. Ah, and don't forget bottoms! Bottoms are nice.

Actually, I quite like breasts. They're all soft and, aw. I'm intimidated by very large ones, though :o I worry I might get lost between them and never find my way out.

*grin* /derail
 
Upvote 0

ReverendDG

Defeater of Dad and AV1611VET
Sep 3, 2006
2,548
124
45
✟18,401.00
Faith
Pantheist
Politics
US-Others
The answer according to the book at the start of the thread is to get 3 hots and a cot for life.
well when your only other options are either to starve to death or become a prostitute, i'd say marrying is the best of the three
when you have no power what do you do?

Personally, I think everyone marries for their own reasons.
well yes, but historically women didn't really have much of a choice.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
well yes, but historically women didn't really have much of a choice.

Indeed. In other words, their reasons were "Not wanting to live in poverty and be shunned by all and sundry".
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.