David Kent
Continuing Historicist
- Aug 24, 2017
- 2,174
- 665
- 87
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Conservative
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There is no antichrist in. Daniel 9what I'm saying is that the future final Antichrist will fulfill all of Daniel 7, 8, 9 and 11 all as one person, rather than seeing history play out and saying "this fits here" and "this fits there" when the final antichrist comes, the perfect fulfillment, it will just be "this fits"
the bible does not shy away from history repeating itself, in fact biblically there are many "types" of Antichrist beginning with Nimrod, if not all the way back to Cain.
But there is a specific one being referred to repeatedly in scripture who all types (including future types that would come after the bible was completed) are predecessors to, including AE4, including Caesar, including Mohammad. including Hitler.
the final antichrist will be like Nimrod, like Pharaoh, like Antiochus, like Mohammad, and like Hitler.
like, yes, there was a Greek empire that took over the Persian empire, I agree with that, what I'm saying is there will be another one. an empire from that region of Western Turkey/Greece from the area that biblically the Javanites were, will attack Iran, then be split up, and a little horn will come from the Northern state of the 4 splintered states.
Logically speaking, there's rationale to it even in modern times. Erdogan wants to reestablish the Ottoman Empire, they're Sunni, Iran is Shia.
Hypothetical scenario, Iran declares they have the 12th Imam, and begins to make campaigns in Afghanistan, and Iraq and other neighboring countries, conquering under the black flag of Khorasan (an Islamic prophecy about the Mahdi, the reason why ISIS used the black flag). Erdogan declares the revival of the Ottoman Empire, and himself as the Caliph. You now have a Shi'a, and Sunni leaders declaring themselves Caliphs, one they proclaim to be the Mahdi. Do you think the Sunni Erdogan, is going to accept a Shi'a Mahdi? No he'd likely attack Iran, and Turkey is much stronger than Iran militarily.
In this scenario, Erdogan is the first king of a newly declared Empire.
He would then be killed, as the rest of the world won't just allow the Ottoman Empire coming back.. and divide it up. It can go on from there.
Obviously that's a hypothetical, not saying it will happen, but something like it could happen, and something like it will happen, not necessarily with those players but those regions of the world.
David, who is this verse referring to.... Jesus, right ? Jesus is the rightful King of Israel. The "Anti" (instead of, against, Jesus) christ is the forthcoming King of Israel, the Jews will erroneously believe is their messiah for a while.There is no antichrist in. Daniel 9
Show me where it says Antichrist is the 70th week.the 70th week.
David, who is this verse referring to.... Jesus, right ? Jesus is the rightful King of Israel. The "Anti" (instead of, against, Jesus) christ is the forthcoming King of Israel, the Jews will erroneously believe is their messiah for a while.
That is who will confirm the Mt Sinai covenant for 7 years in Daniel 9:27.
Mark 15:32
32 Let Christ the King of Israel descend now from the cross, that we may see and believe. And they that were crucified with him reviled him.
The king of the Jews at that time implied "the" messiah, the promised great King of Israel descended from king David.Jesus came as the king of the Jews and they rejected him.
Show me where it says Antichrist is the 70th week.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Daniel 9:27 is not a reference to AD70, the verse prior to it does have a reference to it thoughWho destroyed the temple? The Romans. The Roman troops destroyed the temple and desolated Jerusalem.
Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
First this is about the crucifixion I'm sure we'll both agree26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:
That's AD70, so it comes before the 70th week but after the crucifixion in the 69th week.and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
This is about the Abomination of Desolation, taking place in the 70th week.27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Jesus' ministry began when he was baptised, he was cut off in the middle of the week, the 70th week. The people of the prince who was to come, the Romans, the people of the prince not the prince destroyed the sanctuary. The prince is not the subject, but his people are. Therefore "27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease," refers back to Messiah, the last person mentioned, who was a minister to the circumcised to confirm the promise the covenant obviously, made to the fathers. Romans 15:8Daniel 9:27 is not a reference to AD70, the verse prior to it does have a reference to it though
Daniel 9
First this is about the crucifixion I'm sure we'll both agree
That's AD70, so it comes before the 70th week but after the crucifixion in the 69th week.
This is about the Abomination of Desolation, taking place in the 70th week.
There are 2 princes, Messiah, and Anti-messiah. 1 is the true, the other is the imitation.
I am sure you can read and understand. So read carefully. 26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfDaniel 9:27 is not a reference to AD70, the verse prior to it does have a reference to it though
Daniel 9
First this is about the crucifixion I'm sure we'll both agree
That's AD70, so it comes before the 70th week but after the crucifixion in the 69th week.
This is about the Abomination of Desolation, taking place in the 70th week.
There are 2 princes, Messiah, and Anti-messiah. 1 is the true, the other is the imitation.
He was cut off before any covenant was confirmed for a week, so no.Jesus' ministry began when he was baptised, he was cut off in the middle of the week, the 70th week. The people of the prince who was to come, the Romans, the people of the prince not the prince destroyed the sanctuary. The prince is not the subject, but his people are. Therefore "27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease," refers back to Messiah, the last person mentioned, who was a minister to the circumcised to confirm the promise the covenant obviously, made to the fathers. Romans 15:8
24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
I am sure you can read and understand. So read carefully. 26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself
After 62 weeks. That is in the 70th week. Jesus came and was announced by John and a voice from heaven at his Baptism 3½ years later, in the midst of the prophetic week and a literal week, Wednesday, he was cut off.
He was cut off before any covenant was confirmed for a week, so no.
not to mention, the 70th week is the last week, the purposes of the 70 weeks:
We still have sin and transgression, and if you believe prophecy is sealed up, then you do not belong in the Eschatology forums (full preterists are to go to controversial Christian theology)
Oh and finally, in the text of Daniel 9:26 it describes the destruction of Jerusalem, THEN the covenant is confirmed for 1 week.
So people keep saying but they are not reading.Not how Israelites reckon dates. They count the day they are on currently. IE it was not AFTER 69 weeks and thus the 70th week, but DURING the 69th week.
Just like they count the day that Jesus was crucified as day 1 of the 3 days before the resurrection, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, where in our western reckoning we'd expect if Jesus was crucified on Friday then He would be resurrected after 3 days.... on Monday. There was certainly not 72 hours between Jesus' death and resurrection. He died in the middle of the day on Friday, and was resurrected on Sunday morning, so in reality only 1 of those days was a full 24 hours
there's still sin, and there's still prophecy to be fulfilled.The transgression was finished or as Jesus said in Matthew 23, the Jews filled up the measure of their fathers who had killed the prophets, but killing Him.
The Law and prophets were till John. The prophecy concerning Messiah.
There is still sin but there is now forgiveness of sin through the death and resurrection of Jesus. Jesus brought an end to sin.there's still sin, and there's still prophecy to be fulfilled.
There is still sin but there is now forgiveness of sin through the death and resurrection of Jesus. Jesus brought an end to sin.
1 Corinthians 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?