- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
False. They used the present as the key already, before I started to bust their blalls.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
False. They used the present as the key already, before I started to bust their blalls.A position you have reached because of your mighty evidence which you do not provide.
False. They used the present as the key already, before I started to bust their blalls.
False. They used the present as the key already, before I started to bust their blalls.
Really, everytime I wake up, nothing is the same and everything is different. My brother and I just had a conversation and it would appear he remembers things different from the way I remember them. In fact it is very difficult to get any two honest people to agree on anything that has taken place in the past. Then you have Physicists who say there is a parallel universe(s) where different possible realitys play themselves out.I wish everyone would wake up and stop with this same-state past madness
That's what Taoism is about -- reestablishing harmony between good and evil, light and dark, positive and negative, etc and so forth.If something bad happens, it has to be for SOME reason!
Funny, when I wake up it is the same. When I read history, it is the same. But there is a limit to how far back we actually know about. Don't be so extreme.Really, everytime I wake up, nothing is the same and everything is different. My brother and I just had a conversation and it would appear he remembers things different from the way I remember them. In fact it is very difficult to get any two honest people to agree on anything that has taken place in the past. Then you have Physicists who say there is a parallel universe(s) where different possible realitys play themselves out.
One can no more do that for than against. Not as far as science goes. We need more....hence the records.Then present your evidence from reality that the laws were different!
That's what Taoism is about -- reestablishing harmony between good and evil, light and dark, positive and negative, etc and so forth.
One can no more do that for than against. Not as far as science goes. We need more....hence the records.
ALL evidence supports a different state past...bible and pagan records. NONE support a same state past. Science first assumes it, THEN builds stuff on that. If there was no decay in the past, then decay so called dating is nonsense.Let's start with the fact that I've given you the example of radiological dating.
And let me ask you this... If you admit there is no evidence to support your claim, why do you believe it?
ALL evidence supports a different state past...bible and pagan records.
NONE support a same state past.
Science first assumes it, THEN builds stuff on that. If there was no decay in the past, then decay so called dating is nonsense.
ALL evidence supports a different state past...bible and pagan records. NONE support a same state past. Science first assumes it, THEN builds stuff on that. If there was no decay in the past, then decay so called dating is nonsense.
Recorded history only goes back so far. In my family they only have written records back to around 800 ad. God has provided natural records for us. There is a record in the DNA, also Geology contains a record of the natural world. It is difficult to get people to agree. I asked a friend of mine with a phd in physics about the string theory and he got upset and said he never studied it and does not accept it. All I know about it is an hour program I saw on PBS TV and even with his PHD he does not seem to even know that much about it.But there is a limit to how far back we actually know about.
Unfortunately, they only go back a few thousand years. The universe is much older than that.
My point exactly, it is wrong.Why should it if it is wrong?
if there was no decay in the past, then Rubidium-strontium dating would give results that do not agree with uranium-lead dating
Why?which would likewise disagree with carbon-nitrogen dating.
With themselves only. Fairy tales do likewise.And yet these techniques are all in agreement.
I disagree. You only claim it is a record of this nature because this is where we see it from. If it was a different nature in the past, we would still see what we see.Recorded history only goes back so far. In my family they only have written records back to around 800 ad. God has provided natural records for us. There is a record in the DNA, also Geology contains a record of the natural world.
It is difficult to get people to agree. I asked a friend of mine with a phd in physics about the string theory and he got upset and said he never studied it and does not accept it. All I know about it is an hour program I saw on PBS TV and even with his PHD he does not seem to even know that much about it.
? What is "they"?And they all support a different different state past. How do you explain that?
Sorry to hear you had problems. Not sure if debating evolution will help. Maybe a good time to think about love and family, and whatever good things are around.....And they all support a different different state past. How do you explain that?
The Bible and Pagan records, of course.
And you should find out how radioisotopic dating works, and then try and figure out for yourself why if there was no decay in the past, uranium-lead, and rubidium-strontium dating shouldn't agree with each other. It'll be good for you.
IN YOUR DREAMS. Unfortunate for you. Not me.
My point exactly, it is wrong.
How? Why? Explain?
Why?
With themselves only. Fairy tales do likewise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?