That is all my brain can handle. I am not going to write a book and respond to every point that every person is making in response. Maybe every point you make is important to you, but that does not make it important to me. Or even worthy of consideration.
Because they can be demonstrated objectively
In Matthew 4:17-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, and the Mosaic Law was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from or disobedience to it is an integral part of the Gospel message. Furthermore, Jesus set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked (1 John 2:6). So Jesus spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example, which means that this is what all who seek to follow his teachings should do.
The Mosaic Law contains 248 positive commands to do something and 365 negative commands not to do something, though the negative commands should also be understood as being commands to do the reverse, such as the command not to commit theft also being understood as the command to be generous.
I'm sorry if I was unclear. The point of mentioning the limited number of Laws in science was to emphasise that they have only a limited relevance to most aspects of science. Moreover, scientific laws and Biblical laws are totally different in character and comparisons between them are irrelevant. Therefore, interesting as your post here is, it has nothing to do with my post, other than suggesting to me that you did not understand it. (Note the second item in my signature.)
