1 Timothy 1:8-11, "We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. 9 We also know that law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers -- and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me." (NIV)
Above, Paul clearly states that "the law is made not for the righteous", but for the goats. Also:
Colossians 2:14, "having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross." (NIV)
Concerning the law of Moses, Paul clearly states that Christ "took it away, nailing it to the cross". And:
1 Corinthians 9:21, "To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law." (NIV)
Paul also clearly states that he (we) are under Christ's law.
Now, I have noticed that some people seem to feel, by what I've seen them say, that parts of the law of Moses still apply, even under the new covenant, and I am wondering why?? It seems to me that this confusion, and it is confusion, comes from one verse in particular, that being:
Matthew 5:17-18, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished." (NIV)
So, above Christ states that he has not come to abolish the law, but then Paul seems to completely contradict this statement:
Ephesians 2:14-15, "For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, 15 by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace" (NIV)
So, Christ states that he did not come to abolish the law, and then Paul states that "by abolishing in his flesh the law" which "appears" to be a direct contradiction.
So, given that "the law is made not for the righteous", and that it was nailed to the cross, and that we are now under Christ's law, what evidence is there that the law of Moses still applies in any way, shape, or form????
Above, Paul clearly states that "the law is made not for the righteous", but for the goats. Also:
Colossians 2:14, "having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross." (NIV)
Concerning the law of Moses, Paul clearly states that Christ "took it away, nailing it to the cross". And:
1 Corinthians 9:21, "To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law." (NIV)
Paul also clearly states that he (we) are under Christ's law.
Now, I have noticed that some people seem to feel, by what I've seen them say, that parts of the law of Moses still apply, even under the new covenant, and I am wondering why?? It seems to me that this confusion, and it is confusion, comes from one verse in particular, that being:
Matthew 5:17-18, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished." (NIV)
So, above Christ states that he has not come to abolish the law, but then Paul seems to completely contradict this statement:
Ephesians 2:14-15, "For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, 15 by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace" (NIV)
So, Christ states that he did not come to abolish the law, and then Paul states that "by abolishing in his flesh the law" which "appears" to be a direct contradiction.
So, given that "the law is made not for the righteous", and that it was nailed to the cross, and that we are now under Christ's law, what evidence is there that the law of Moses still applies in any way, shape, or form????