Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. God said He breathed His spirit into the man He made with dust. Our heritage is God and life. Unlike the claimed heritage of science...that we are jellyfish kin.Logically, it is just as insulting to claim our heritage is dirt.
I wouldn't mind that story from an open atheist.
In your case, it is a problem.
No. God said He breathed His spirit into the man He made with dust.
Then they all ate cheerios that turned into little flying saucers?
I would call it fantasy, since your are just begging the question as usual.When God moves down to earth forever, I guess we would call the planet glorified dirt also?
I am biased, all people are biased. In this area of debate, I am biased in favor of evidence. I have no problem researching death and what happens after. I DO have a problem with over-hyping something and then revealing that the hype was vapor. Even if that happens on 'my side' (as was done with ENCODE, for example, or those claims a few years back that a NASA researcher had discovered a new form of life). You implied that the soul is real and we are "rebootable" because in part of this amazing, tremendous, massive, one-of-a-kind study. I looked into it. I saw a LOT of hyperbole leading up to the study's release. And then, the aftermath was 'more to do, no real conclusions.'Show me something / someone that is ever been completely free of bias or pre-conceived outcomes. Are you so convinced your right that your committing a fallacy , sometimes its not what you say but how you say it, if you are not here for learning and enlightenment, what are you here for (on the forum) ?
Why would I try to show wild fantasies to be wrong?Then TRY to show me Scripturally where I'm wrong. That way, all can learn. Amen?
Baloney.Un-Scriptural. God (Elohim-The Trinity) didn't make Adam from dust. Lord God/Jesus made Adam and gave him temporary life on the 3rd Day. Gen 2:4-7 God the Trinity "created" Adam which means that Adam was made immortal on the present 6th Day Gen 1:27 or Spiritually in the Image and likeness of Jesus. Adam will live forever just as God lives forever. Gen 1:26 Gen 5:1-2 and John 14:16
Not buying manure today, thanks.Adam was formed from the dust on the 3rd Day. Gen 2:4-7
Eve was not made until the present 6th Day after the sons of God (prehistoric people) and every other animal was made and named by Adam. Gen 2:19
What is interesting is that BOTH Adam & Eve were "created in God's Image" at the same time, later on the present 6th Day, the Day of Salvation, according to the Lord. Gen 1:26 Gen 5:1-2 Amen?
I am biased, all people are biased. In this area of debate, I am biased in favor of evidence. I have no problem researching death and what happens after. I DO have a problem with over-hyping something and then revealing that the hype was vapor. Even if that happens on 'my side' (as was done with ENCODE, for example, or those claims a few years back that a NASA researcher had discovered a new form of life). You implied that the soul is real and we are "rebootable" because in part of this amazing, tremendous, massive, one-of-a-kind study. I looked into it. I saw a LOT of hyperbole leading up to the study's release. And then, the aftermath was 'more to do, no real conclusions.'
What did you think I would do? Convert on the spot?
The question is are we created and in the image of God. If so, then a jellyfish kin origin is truly insulting both to us, and to the One who told us how we actually got here.I would call it fantasy, since your are just begging the question as usual.
No. God said He breathed His spirit into the man He made with dust. Our heritage is God and life. Unlike the claimed heritage of science...that we are jellyfish kin.
He formed man first. We were not some blob of jelly. Woman was taken from a bone of man also, not a glob of jelly from a jellyfish.God could breath His Spirit into jellyfish kin as easily as into dirt. You are not being logical here, merely seeking to persuade by showing distaste instead of citing evidence.
He formed man first. We were not some blob of jelly. Woman was taken from a bone of man also, not a glob of jelly from a jellyfish.
The issue is not what God could do, but what He did do.
Aman, please explain the following:Un-Scriptural. God (Elohim-The Trinity) didn't make Adam from dust.
Science is the enemy of God and our souls.
Not.Adam was formed from the dust on the 3rd Day.
Right ... then the multiplicand is Darwin and the multiplier is Satan.... we are the products of evolution.
As soon as you stop using the air God created ex materia.oops, you better stop using electricity, television, telephone, clothing, food, clean water, paper, pencils, soap, money, radios, cars, eye glasses, light bulbs, eating utensils and EVERYTHING that science has helped to create.
Indeed, that is the issue, and the evidence is there, and the discovery has been made, we are the products of evolution. Whether you wish to admit God's hand in that is your own call, I know that I do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?