• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

The "internal forum"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magisterium

Praying and Thinking
Jan 22, 2003
1,136
99
49
Kansas
Visit site
✟1,813.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hey,
I was wondering if any people here are familiar with this term. From the research I've been able to do, it seems to be an appeal to one's internal feelings over the authoritative declaration by the church in the matter of annulment.


From what I've heard and read, apparently, if someone who has re-married (outside of the church) requests an annulment and it is denied, they can "in good conscience" approach the Blessed Sacrament if through prayer careful consideration, they should find it permissable.

With what I understand about the church's moral teachings, no amount of "prayerful reflection" or "careful consideration" makes a mortal sin no longer a mortal sin. Though one's personal culpability may be diminished by certain circumstances, the act itself remains intrinsically wrong.

The reason I ask is that I know of a priest who is apparently extending this idea of the "internal forum" to other matters outside of annulment. All published references to this idea that I've found (which stands on shaky ground at best anyway) are in reference to annulment only. Has anyone else come across this idea in practice or in education?
 

Carrye

Weisenheimer
Aug 30, 2003
14,064
731
✟44,202.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Concerning the Reception of Holy Communion by Divorced and Remarried Members of the Faithful

In recent years in various regions different pastoral solutions in this area have been suggested according to which, to be sure, a general admission of the divorced and remarried to eucharistic communion would not be possible, but divorced and-remarried members of the faithful could approach holy communion in specific cases when they consider themselves authorized according to a judgment of conscience to do so. This would be the case, for example, when they had been abandoned completely unjustly although they sincerely tried to save the previous marriage, or when they are convinced of the nullity of their previous marriage although unable to demonstrate it in the external forum, or when they have gone through a long period of reflection and penance, or also when for morally valid reasons they cannot satisfy the obligation to separate.

Related:
Internal Forum and Marriage

On Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.