• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Immaculate Conception contradicts the gospel (2)

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you not understand that Jesus was both fully God and fully man? Jesus is just a human as you and I. Nothing lacked in Him when it came to His humanity. Are you become a Docetist on me?

Pardon my example:

A mule is from a male donkey and female horse. It is a different animal.

Christ Jesus is from God and man. You and I are from a woman and man.

So when the bible says all men have sinned, its referring to the offspring of man/woman. Christ is God/man.

There's no exceptions to the rule, including Mary.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It seemed to me that the passage I quoted from the CCC was quite specific and not intentionally vague as to allow "wiggle room" as Mama Kidogo has suggested. Here it is again for further discussion -

491 Through the centuries the Church has become ever more aware that Mary, "full of grace" through God, was redeemed from the moment of her conception. That is what the dogma of the Immaculate Conception confesses, as Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1854:
The most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ, Savior of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin.

They're saying Mary did not need to be born-again of incorruptible seed.
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well concerning how early this belief was seen let us look at the witnesses of this doctrine:

St. Irenaeus Against Heresies, bk III, ch 22, 4: 4. In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word.” But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. And even as she, having indeed a husband, Adam, but being nevertheless as yet a virgin (for in Paradise “they were both naked, and were not ashamed,” inasmuch as they, having been created a short time previously, had no understanding of the procreation of children: for it was necessary that they should first come to adult age, and then multiply from that time onward), having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. And on this account does the law term a woman betrothed to a man, the wife of him who had betrothed her, although she was as yet a virgin; thus indicating the back-reference from Mary to Eve, because what is joined together could not otherwise be put asunder than by inversion of the process by which these bonds of union had arisen; so that the former ties be cancelled by the latter, that the latter may set the former again at liberty. And it has, in fact, happened that the first compact looses from the second tie, but that the second tie takes the position of the first which has been cancelled. For this reason did the Lord declare that the first should in truth be last, and the last first. And the prophet, too, indicates the same, saying, “instead of fathers, children have been born unto you.” For the Lord, having been born “the First-begotten of the dead,” and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.

Justin Martyr: Dialogue with Trypho, ch 100: and that He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, 'Be it unto me according to your word.'

These here are two of the earliest apologetic writings of the Church, and already it was commonly viewed that Mary is the new Eve, as her Son is the new Adam. And we see here the comparison and contrast of the new and old Eve is similar to the comparison and contrast of the new and old Adam. It was Mary's obedience that unmade the disobedience of Eve. I think it would be a stretch to say that Mary as the new Eve was really disobedient like Eve and every other woman who has lived, but since she was obedient just once, she is now the new Eve. No I think that would be a huge stretch. Especially considering that Gabriel gave her the title of Full of Grace or Most Favored.
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Pardon my example:

A mule is from a male donkey and female horse. It is a different animal.

Christ Jesus is from God and man. You and I are from a woman and man.

So when the bible says all men have sinned, its referring to the offspring of man/woman. Christ is God/man.

There's no exceptions to the rule, including Mary.
Oh so not a Docetist then but rather a Miaphysite. You may be digging yourself a hole here SU.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Pardon my example:

A mule is from a male donkey and female horse. It is a different animal.

Christ Jesus is from God and man. You and I are from a woman and man.

So when the bible says all men have sinned, its referring to the offspring of man/woman. Christ is God/man.

There's no exceptions to the rule, including Mary.

The bigger point, though, is that you are contending against a "seat of the pants" argument. Jesus was sinless because God cannot have sin. It has nothing to do with--nor does the RCC teach--any idea that because Jesus was sinless this somehow makes the legend of Mary being immaculately conceived somehow more credible.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
...
No it wasn't a magical process, but this process didn't last until the Protestant Reformation. It ended much sooner. I would say nearly a 1000 years sooner in the West.

The fact that you had to differentiate between West and East here is ample enough recognition of my point.
Widespread acceptance came very early, formal acceptance only at Trent.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Why should I? I see in the passages of Luke and in Revelations this fact of her Immaculateness being true. But I see zero evidence to support Sola Scriptura in Scripture. Zero. So until you give up this modern innovation, which IC predates well over a 1000 years, then you are just being hypocritical.
I don't think it is necessary to call me hypocritical.
It is enough that you note that there is no historical trail leading to this dogma and what is verifiable from the apostolic age.





So you are admitting that Sola Scriptura is a man-made construct. Careful you are going to get lynched by the Protestant mob. :p
It is a useful method to discern Christian truth, and a necessary parameter to prevent some of the abuses that occurred. It is hardly de fide dogma.



I don't think a lot of scholars would agree with this comment.
I am not sure why they wouldn't. 1800 years gives leeway for a product with final edits done to original scripts.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't think it is necessary to call me hypocritical.
It is enough that you note that there is no historical trail leading to this dogma and what is verifiable from the apostolic age.



It is a useful method to discern Christian truth, and a necessary parameter to prevent some of the abuses that occurred. It is hardly de fide dogma.



I am not sure why they wouldn't. 1800 years gives leeway for a product with final edits done to original scripts.



Well, remember that his main argument is unassailable--HE can't see it. It's there but HE can't see it, although he does see things in Revelations (sic) that aren't there.

Erose said:
I see in the passages of Luke and in Revelations this fact of her Immaculateness being true. But I see....

How can anyone (and why need anyone) argue against that? ;)
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Pardon my example:

A mule is from a male donkey and female horse. It is a different animal.

Christ Jesus is from God and man. You and I are from a woman and man.

So when the bible says all men have sinned, its referring to the offspring of man/woman. Christ is God/man.

There's no exceptions to the rule, including Mary.

Says who? Nobody with any authority...
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well concerning how early this belief was seen let us look at the witnesses of this doctrine:

St. Irenaeus Against Heresies, bk III, ch 22, 4: 4. In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word.” But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. And even as she, having indeed a husband, Adam, but being nevertheless as yet a virgin (for in Paradise “they were both naked, and were not ashamed,” inasmuch as they, having been created a short time previously, had no understanding of the procreation of children: for it was necessary that they should first come to adult age, and then multiply from that time onward), having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. And on this account does the law term a woman betrothed to a man, the wife of him who had betrothed her, although she was as yet a virgin; thus indicating the back-reference from Mary to Eve, because what is joined together could not otherwise be put asunder than by inversion of the process by which these bonds of union had arisen; so that the former ties be cancelled by the latter, that the latter may set the former again at liberty. And it has, in fact, happened that the first compact looses from the second tie, but that the second tie takes the position of the first which has been cancelled. For this reason did the Lord declare that the first should in truth be last, and the last first. And the prophet, too, indicates the same, saying, “instead of fathers, children have been born unto you.” For the Lord, having been born “the First-begotten of the dead,” and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.

Justin Martyr: Dialogue with Trypho, ch 100: and that He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, 'Be it unto me according to your word.'

These here are two of the earliest apologetic writings of the Church, and already it was commonly viewed that Mary is the new Eve, as her Son is the new Adam. And we see here the comparison and contrast of the new and old Eve is similar to the comparison and contrast of the new and old Adam. It was Mary's obedience that unmade the disobedience of Eve. I think it would be a stretch to say that Mary as the new Eve was really disobedient like Eve and every other woman who has lived, but since she was obedient just once, she is now the new Eve. No I think that would be a huge stretch. Especially considering that Gabriel gave her the title of Full of Grace or Most Favored.

Digging in uninspired territory, are we? I am not surprised.
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you not understand that Jesus was both fully God and fully man? Jesus is just a human as you and I. Nothing lacked in Him when it came to His humanity. Are you become a Docetist on me?

New math, have we? Docetism declares that God faked everything. That is not true. You are carrying the label a bit too far. Docetism and catholicism are both "isms".
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Oh so not a Docetist then but rather a Miaphysite. You may be digging yourself a hole here SU.

Like the Oriental Orthodox?

Christ at birth: One person, two natures (man/God)

Man, including Mary, at birth: One person, one nature (female/male)

When we are born again, we are a new creature (one person, two natures (man and of God). Thus Christ taught us (born again believers) to pray: Our Father ...

Therefore, IC contradicts scripture (all men (one person, one nature) have sinned).
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
She does, if you listen to Jesus.

BTW:

I listen to Paul who was given a revelation by the ascended Lord and Paul alone in AD 63 about the new calling. If you deny Paul as apostle to the Gentiles and accept Peter the apostle to the circumcision as your apostle you deny the Lord on 2 fronts. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0