Of course Adam and Eve were ONLY 6,000 years ago. Science AND History AND the Bible confirm that. So you have at least three witness as we see with Bishop Usshers book. The bible says generations. Today we use the term genealogy. The Cohan is the best example for their virginity or purity. We read about the 144,000 in John's book of revelation.
- Biblical Lineage: The Cohanim, or Kohanim, are descendants of Aaron, the brother of Moses, from the tribe of Levi. They were designated as priests in the Temple of Jerusalem and held specific religious duties.
- Genetic Studies: Modern genetic studies have identified markers in the Y-chromosome (the Cohen Modal Haplotype) that are common among many men who identify as Cohanim, suggesting a common ancestry.
The issue IS that on day six of chapter one we are not talking about Adam and Eve from Chapter two. We are talking about mankind. Male and female. I have done a lot of study on WHY God made us male and female. Even HOW God made us male and female. Chapter two had to do with one man and one women. In fact at first women was Eves' name before Adam named her Eve.
The terms "female" and "woman" are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings:
Female:
- Biological Term: "Female" is a biological term that refers to the sex of an individual who has reproductive organs that produce eggs. This term is used across species, not just for humans.
- Scientific Context: It's often used in scientific and medical contexts to describe sex-based characteristics.
Woman:
- Gender Identity: "Woman" is a term that refers to a person's gender identity. It is used to describe an adult human female.
- Cultural and Social Role: The term encompasses not just biological aspects but also social, cultural, and personal identity factors.
Key Differences:
- Scope: "Female" can refer to any species, while "woman" specifically refers to human beings.
- Context: "Female" is more often used in biological and scientific contexts, whereas "woman" is used in social, cultural, and personal contexts.
Understanding these distinctions helps in appreciating the nuances of language and identity.
Here is the only tangible statement in the entire weblink that you've shared:
"Introducing this correction into the exponential equation that details the duration of the six 24 hour days of Genesis Chapter One results in an age of the universe from our perspective of 14 billion years [14, 000,000,000 years]. From the Bible’s perspective of time for those six evocative days of Genesis, the number of our years held compressed within each of those six 24 hour days of Genesis, starting with Day One, would be, in billions of years, respectively, 7.1; 3.6; 1.8; 0.89; 0.45; 0.23."
Day 1: 7.1 billion years
Day 2: 3.6 billion years
Day 3: 1.8 billion years
Day 4: 0.89 billion years
Day 5: 0.45 billion years
Day 6: 0.23 billion years
Day 7: 0.12 billion years (this value follows the decreasing trend)
And I'm sorry, but scientifically, this doesnt make any sense.
Let's convert it for simplicity:
Day 1: 7.1 billion years
Day 2: 3.6 billion years
Day 3: 1.8 billion years
Day 4: 890 million years
Day 5: 450 million years
Day 6: 230 million years
Day 7: 120 million years
Now, people were not around 230 millions years ago, and if day 7 came after day 6, and day 7 was 120 million years ago, then that presents an obvious conflict. People were likewise not around 120 million years ago.
Indeed, you did properly translate the information from your source. However, it is inconsistent with paleontology, and it is plainly incorrect.
Also, if birds and fish were created on day 5, that might imply that birds were around in the ordovician, and I'm sorry but that's completely wrong. Birds were not around in the Paleozoic.
This is just as bad as reading young earth creationist content. People cant seem to come to terms with the fact that the Bible is not a science textbook.