The Fossils for Human Evolution

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Rotflmao.

They are.

 

[Frank Robert]

Incredulity because of lack of evidence is acceptable.

Personal incredulity is a fallacy. There is plenty of evidence of human origins which you apparently have a need to keep yourself ignorant of.

 

[Humble_Disciple]

You might be among God's elect without even realizing it yet. But you will not receive the gift of faith until you soften your heart, and then the Holy Spirit will do the rest.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You might be among God's elect without even realizing it yet. But you will not receive the gift of faith until you soften your heart, and then the Holy Spirit will do the rest.

This is a forum to discuss science, not preach.

 

[renniks]

They are.

Would you prefer if I said they were a mix of ape and human bones?

 

[AV1611VET]

This is a forum to discuss science, not preach.

Shortest message I ever heard.

(And don't forget the plate when it comes around. )

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Would you prefer if I said they were a mix of ape and human bones?

Humans are apes though. We are in the hominidae family, the great apes.

You really just don't care about being wrong, do you?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Shortest message I ever heard.

(And don't forget the plate when it comes around. )

There's a two word message I could have done, but it might violate forum rules (though there's no swearing in it, before anyone else thinks otherwise).

 

[Yttrium]

Incredulity because of lack of evidence is acceptable.

This is true. And a degree of skepticism is encouraged in any case.

 

[renniks]

Humans are apes though. We are in the hominidae family, the great apes.

You really just don't care about being wrong, do you?

I'm not. They are.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I'm not. They are.

No, you are wrong. You've never done anything to show that you are right or even correct about science.

 

[Shemjaza]

Exactly. The bones they point to are fragmented and incomplete skeletons often mixes of human and primates bones.

Lies don't become truth by just repeating them. They just show your character.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Lies don't become truth by just repeating them. They just show your character.

Lying for Jesus isn't lying. It's, um...... something that isn't lying.

 

[renniks]

Lies don't become truth by just repeating them. They just show your character.

Only there are scientists who agree. The bones are highly contested among those in the paleontology field.

 

[renniks]

Lying for Jesus isn't lying. It's, um...... something that isn't lying.

Accusing people of lying is flaming.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Only there are scientists who agree. The bones are highly contested among those in the paleontology field.

Citation?

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Accusing people of lying is flaming.

Who did I accuse of lying? I am very aware of the rules.

 

[renniks]

Citation?

For example, Owen Lovejoy, who worked with Johanson analyzing the Lucy fossils disagree with his assessment of them.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

For example, Owen Lovejoy, who worked with Johanson analyzing the Lucy fossils disagree with his assessment of them.

One disagreement over one set of bones = "The bones are highly contested among those in the paleontology field", does it?

 

[renniks]

One disagreement over one set of bones = "The bones are highly contested among those in the paleontology field", does it?

They are pretty much all contested if you look into it.