Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It shows that, in the fossil record, depth doesn't mean non-coexistence.And that's supposed to be analogous to the fossilization process?
I was providing an example of fossils forming today - I am aware what sub-fossils are by the way.
What is your point exactly? And what has it got to do with the OP?
SURE dude, must be why every creationist fails to address the points I made.
Up to the very next irrelvant, weak minded post.
Gee, must have missed something in the scientific literature lately. And I read a lot scientific literature on a daily bases, expecially in biology, geology, paleontology and genetics. Let's leave it at that I am very well informed about the current state of affairs in those scientific disciplines.
I can tell you that in science there are no such recently discovered facts.
Ive already corrected him upon that, over 4 to 6 months ago, and they even admit that the sub-fossils are not really fossils at all. Is he still trying that false claim???Thank you for making my point: There are no Dodo fossils, only subfossils.
Also let us be clear WHY they call them subfossils.Thank you for making my point: There are no Dodo fossils, only subfossils.
Also let us be clear WHY they call them subfossils.
They main reason is age, most date to only a few thousand years, but the rest of the story is telling in the extreme.
“The main importance of these vertebrate subfossil (versus fully fossilized) remains is that they contain organic material, which can be used for radiocarbon dating or the extraction and sequencing of DNA, protein, or other biomolecules.”
Best save this quote as they’ll be changing it when they realize it contradicts their very own claims of age....
So in reality since even full fossils contain original organic matter, I concur with their correct assessment of age which is a mere few thousands of years for all dinosaurs....
Even if they won’t accept the dating they have gotten for those fossils, yet claim they can be dated by carbon 14 methods because they still contain organic material.
Do you see their double-talk and avoidance....
Because the subfossils, dodo birds, etc, did not die in the flood, which as we know exposure to sea water changes carbon absorption. And still they date to only 40,000 years. So your claims of drastically less trace amounts just doesn’t jive with the actual amounts found in them....But don't you see, if the earth is only 6000 years old, ALL FOSSILS whether sub fossils of only a few thousand years old or actual fossils should contain NEARLY THE SAME concentration of radiocarbon.
But they don't. Subfossils contain MUCH more than the trace amounts that are supposedly found in dinosaur fossils.
Because the subfossils, dodo birds, etc, did not die in the flood, which as we know exposure to sea water changes carbon absorption. And still they date to only 40,000 years. So your claims of drastically less trace amounts just doesn’t jive with the actual amounts found in them....
Correct for flood exposure and......
Because the subfossils, dodo birds, etc, did not die in the flood, which as we know exposure to sea water changes carbon absorption. And still they date to only 40,000 years. So your claims of drastically less trace amounts just doesn’t jive with the actual amounts found in them....
Correct for flood exposure and...... You get dates to just before the creation of man, the fifth destruction. The problem is you all keep trying to tie dinosaurs into Noah’s flood, which is separate ate from the floods that killed most life in the five previous destructions.
Because the subfossils, dodo birds, etc, did not die in the flood, which as we know exposure to sea water changes carbon absorption. And still they date to only 40,000 years. So your claims of drastically less trace amounts just doesn’t jive with the actual amounts found in them....
Correct for flood exposure and...... You get dates to just before the creation of man, the fifth destruction. The problem is you all keep trying to tie dinosaurs into Noah’s flood, which is separate ate from the floods that killed most life in the five previous destructions.
Ive already corrected him upon that, over 4 to 6 months ago, and they even admit that the sub-fossils are not really fossils at all. Is he still trying that false claim???
That’s all evolutionists do is try to repeat false information.
Would Justa, in your opinion, fail a polygraph test?I urge anyone who doubts a forum member could lie so easily and blatantly to check the link I posted earlier...
The 10 commandments mean nothing to these hypocrites.
Would Justa, in your opinion, fail a polygraph test?
Would sodium pentothal, administered to your "hypocrites," support your accusation?
Hmmm ...Dunno about Justa, but certain professional apologists, yes. Like Hovind.
Ask the folks at No Lie MRI.What does an MRI have to do with lying?
Ask the folks at No Lie MRI.
But better yet, try and see the point I'm making.
It'll save a lot of chit chat.
Well, for the record, it was Justa that Jimmy put on the stand and waved the Ten Commandments at.I already know the point you're making. We've had this discussion before. Lying implies intent. I fully agree. That's why I said I don't know about Justa; I haven't seen enough to be convinced of intent. I have, however, been convinced of intent by several professional apologists.
Jimmy D said:The 10 commandments mean nothing to these hypocrites.
Well, for the record, it was Justa that Jimmy put on the stand and waved the Ten Commandments at.
He even invoked "hypocrisy" in his post:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?