- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,976
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is a gorilla skull:
It looks nothing like the top row of skulls.
Maybe this is why you saw creation in anatomy - you didn't actually study it one bit.
Dude, have you even looked at a gorilla skull before?
Words from an a debater.
Again, not one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.
Go to the library and read and apprehend paleontology texts.
They really don't look like gorillas.The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
Lie.Rather than Google and copy from other evolution supporting sites, you might want to investigate the content of what you present.
What you present is pollution of supposed facts.
Evolution in the rock record is a story, unsupported by physical lifeform remains.
You should know this if you were educated in paleontology.
Yes, but you claimed the skulls on the top row of the picture presented to you all looked like gorilla skulls.Gorillas didn't evolve?
I've seen creationists ask where the fossils relevant to the evolution of other apes are, as if the fact that there are fewer of them somehow invalidates the fossils relevant to human evolution.A gorilla skull. What happened to all of the gorilla skulls that show their evolution?
-_- the fossil record hasn't been the primary evidence for evolution since before I was born. Genetic comparisons are by far better evidence.Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.
Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.
As claimed by you, one who presents 0 evidence whatsoever. For example, you took issue with this particular image of skull fossilsAnd posters are chiming in like such is not true.
What do you think a transitional fossil would look like?And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.
You know, there are millions of fossils of advanced mammals that the fossil record shows zero sequence of one type of mammal remains going through morphological changes to a structurally different life form.A gorilla skull. What happened to all of the gorilla skulls that show their evolution?
You know people have asked you questions, right?Many have belief in evolution and think they are on pure scientific ground, evidence included.
Bot there are zero fossil sequences of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Zero is zero.
As a former evolutionist in geology classes I knew this - evolution was a belief - and the only understanding we have as physical being trying to know how life and fossils came about, in the details we have assembled, such as in Historical Geology and Paleontology sciences. But the foundation of evolution was upon belief, not on pure stettle evidence. Such as the Tree of Life diagram - there are different configurations to what paleontologists each assumed and deduced. There have been many arguments between camps of paleontologists. Why? The transition fossil sequences did not exist to show firsthand such anatomical changes in progressive fossil assemblies. Zero. All were assumptions.
Zero evidence of what evolution claims- not one lifeform shown by fossils to change progressively into another lifeform.
Zero.
Evolutionist on forums like to sweep this fact under the bus or just not accept it - change their belief to what the fossil record shows about evolution, that there is zero evidences evolution happened.
Meanwhile, the fossil record show how God would have Created lifeforms and their remains over geologic time.
There was a point in time I investigated what I persecuted - those who believe in the Bible. And God showed up in my openness to learn really what has happened in the physical realm over time, if He is.
Many have belief in evolution and think they are on pure scientific ground, evidence included.
Bot there are zero fossil sequences of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Zero is zero.
As a former evolutionist in geology classes I knew this - evolution was a belief - and the only understanding we have as physical beings trying to intelligently grasp and know how life came about, in the field observation details, and scientifically assemble into Historical Geology and Paleontology sciences. But the foundation of evolution was upon belief, not on pure stettle evidence. Such as the Tree of Life diagram - there are different configurations to what paleontologists each assumed and deduced. There have been many arguments between camps of paleontologists. Why? The transition fossil sequences did not exist to show firsthand such anatomical changes in progressive fossil assemblies. Zero. All were assumptions.
Zero evidence of what evolution claims- not one lifeform shown by fossils to change progressively into another lifeform.
Zero.
Evolutionist on forums like to sweep this fact under the bus or just not accept it - change their belief to what the fossil record shows about evolution, that there is zero evidences evolution happened.
Meanwhile, the fossil record show how God would have Created lifeforms and their remains over geologic time.
There was a point in time I investigated what I persecuted - those who believe in the Bible. And God showed up in my openness to learn really what has happened in the physical realm over time, if He is.
It is fact which has given Evolutions a black eye - out of billions of fossils inspected and documented there is not one single sequence/succession that shows Evolution by the fossil record.
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Again, not one evidence has been found.
What the fossil record does show is how God over time would have made Kinds of lifeforms. The fossil record proves this - since there is not one case of displaying by physical remains of postulated evolution of life forms.
Again, out of billions of fossils not one sequence showing hard physical fact of morphological change of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
This is called no foundation for Evolution.
The fossil record instead has tantamount evidence in how God would have developed life over time. And their remains we would have physical evidence to display before all.
It is time for bias debaters and believers in Evolution to face up to the obvious. What the fossil record really shows.
Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.
Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.
And posters are chiming in like such is not true.
And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.
You know, there are millions of fossils of advanced mammals that the fossil record shows zero sequence of one type of mammal remains going through morphological changes to a structurally different life form.
Zero is zero.
There are none. What exists are scientific guesstimations of the tree of life lifeforms found.
And of the below picture, imagine the many very complex mutations to bring about mental, nerve, blood vessel array, and such to transition one human-like species to another. Incredibly complex and intricate biomoleculer and anatomical mutations.
View attachment 225285
This is a gorilla skull:
It looks nothing like the top row of skulls.
Maybe this is why you saw creation in anatomy - you didn't actually study it one bit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?