Words from an a debater.
Again, not one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.
Go to the library and read and apprehend paleontology texts.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Okay, first off: drop the attitude. You are sounding very rude and condescending in practically every post you make. So cut it out. Be an adult instead of sounding like a petulant teenager.
And secondly: why should I get educated in paleontology when you can simply SHOW US what the evidence is for your claims.
[QUOTE[You seem to have amiss of this glaring fact. Evolution has no fossil record foundation to prevent sequential remains where such actually happened.
Words from an a debater. Again, no one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.
Go to the library and read and apprehend paleontology texts.
But you have no reputable sources that you can cite in support of such a sweeping claim.Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.
Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.
And posters are chiming in like such is not true.
And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.
But you have no reputable sources that you can cite in support of such a sweeping claim.
Go for it.A (few) transitional fossils.
You act as though people can't look up information online.
Go for it.
But time is required to self apprehend from the physical rock record evidence. Reading summaries of those who believe in evolution does not cut it. Such is why so many are vastly ignorant that Evolution is not supported by the fossil record.
Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.
As posted a few posts up, but ignored.He's a classic example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. He thinks that he is the reputable source because he's 'educated' (although he never seems to show it), so we just have to take his word for it.
You could always go and look at the fossils for yourself. Any reputable university will have tons (literally) of them.Go for it.
But time is required to self apprehend from the physical rock record evidence. Reading summaries of those who believe in evolution does not cut it. Such is why so many are vastly ignorant that Evolution is not supported by the fossil record.
As posted a few posts up, but ignored.
Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.
Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.
Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.
Ignorance from a debater.Is it really your position that "billions" of fossils have been found and 'inspected'?
Let us say that inspecting each fossil takes but 1 hour (in reality, it can takes weeks or even years to process a fossil).
1 billion hours = 41.6 million days, or ~114000 years.
And you wrote billionS - is that 2 billion?
Are you really saying that paleontologists have collectively spent 228000 years "inspecting" fossils, and not 1 transitional?
I notice you are very shy of telling us how you educated yourself about the fossil record.As posted a few posts up, but ignored.
Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.
Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.
Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.
As posted a few posts up, but ignored.
Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.
Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.
Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.
Ignorance from a debater.
How did you ever get in such a position - and ignorance of the fossil record?
Clearly, he spent 228000 years "inspecting" the billions of fossils recovered.I notice you are very shy of telling us how you educated yourself about the fossil record.
Are you saying field geology and paleontology don't support evolution? If so, your argument is with the many experts who support evolution, not with me.Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.
You do not appear to be a trained geologist with experience in what the fossil record shows.
And have thereby missed the gigantic missing evidence that evolution is suppose to be supported by.
Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.
You do not appear to be a trained geologist with experience in what the fossil record shows.
And have thereby missed the gigantic missing evidence that evolution is suppose to be supported by.
... I'm going to say this first: I cannot believe that I'm having this conversation, with anyone.
And secondly, because what would be the point? Granted, seeing dinosaurs in heaven would be cool, but since Jesus was the son of God, do you not think that God would have looked at the Earth and gone; "Yeah, this might be a bit too dangerous for him."
You are looking at this issue from a creationist point of view.
In the bone, you are not an evolutionist.
A much, much better question is 'When are creationists going to offer any actual positive, supporting evidence that Salvation, as you claim it, ever happened?'
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?