Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes there is. What exactly would you expect to see that isn't visible?
I feel that scientists would've figured it out by now that their number one evidence for supporting evolution, the fossil record, isn't evidence for evolution at all!It is fact which has given Evolutions a black eye - out of billions of fossils inspected and documented there is not one single sequence/succession that shows Evolution by the fossil record.
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Again, not one evidence has been found.
What the fossil record does show is how God over time would have made Kinds of lifeforms. The fossil record proves this - since there is not one case of displaying by physical remains of postulated evolution of life forms.
Again, out of billions of fossils not one sequence showing hard physical fact of morphological change of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
This is called no foundation for Evolution.
The fossil record instead has tantamount evidence in how God would have developed life over time. And their remains we would have physical evidence to display before all.
It is time for bias debaters and believers in Evolution to face up to the obvious. What the fossil record really shows.
Talk is cheap. Explain why it isn't evidence.I feel that scientists would've figured it out by now that their number one evidence for supporting evolution, the fossil record, isn't evidence for evolution at all!
Talk about logic!
It is fact which has given Evolutions a black eye - out of billions of fossils inspected and documented there is not one single sequence/succession that shows Evolution by the fossil record.
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
Again, not one evidence has been found.
What the fossil record does show is how God over time would have made Kinds of lifeforms. The fossil record proves this - since there is not one case of displaying by physical remains of postulated evolution of life forms.
Again, out of billions of fossils not one sequence showing hard physical fact of morphological change of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
This is called no foundation for Evolution.
The fossil record instead has tantamount evidence in how God would have developed life over time. And their remains we would have physical evidence to display before all.
It is time for bias debaters and believers in Evolution to face up to the obvious. What the fossil record really shows.
Talk is cheap. Explain why it isn't evidence.
There are transitional fossils that line up with genetic relatedness of modern animals. Igneous rock layers give us radiometric dating that lines up with the fossils in the sedimentary layers.
That was sarcastic. I meant to point out, that if what the OP said was true, then the greatest minds of today (scientists) are wrong and the OP, without any evidence, is correct. Of course, that is stupid, which was my point. I again forgot not to use sarcasm on the internet.Talk is cheap. Explain why it isn't evidence.
There are transitional fossils that line up with genetic relatedness of modern animals. Igneous rock layers give us radiometric dating that lines up with the fossils in the sedimentary layers.
Clearly my brain was turned off while I responded.I think you missed his sarcasm there Shemjaza, it was probably too subtle for an Aussie.
You do that first.
It is fact which has given Evolutions a black eye - out of billions of fossils inspected and documented there is not one single sequence/succession that shows Evolution by the fossil record.
Not one sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform.
It is time for bias debaters and believers in Evolution to face up to the obvious. What the fossil record really shows.
This is a forum about creation and evolution. I make a post which says: fossils do not support evolution. What is wrong with that? Why is it not adequate? Why must I give any explanation to that?
For the moment, yes.
But it is not settled at all.
May be I will come back to haunt you for what you said.
Creationists are unable to understand the science.
The statement has been retracted. Now will you answer my question?
You are right. Human was not there at that time according to the TE.
So, why bother with human? Why not save dinosaurs?
Why though? Jesus was born of man, not born of... Maiasaura.
Why not? Why not a Jesus for dinosaur? Since there was no man and there was no insurance that human would appear.
Why not? Why not a Jesus for dinosaur? Since there was no man and there was no insurance that human would appear.
Why not? Why not a Jesus for dinosaur? Since there was no man and there was no insurance that human would appear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?