• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The fine tuning of the universe.

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes. Stop assuming that life as we know it is the end goal of the universe. I'm not the first person to have pointed this out to you.
I'll tell you what, you provide evidence that the fine tuning that scientists claim is real is a farce and not true.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I gave you link
No you didn't. You posted links to random unrelated papers and then changed the subject when challenged to point out how they were in any way related to the question you were attempting to answer.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'll tell you what, you provide evidence that the fine tuning that scientists claim is real is a farce and not true.

I've said it a number of times : when scientists say that if things were different they'd be different I agree with them. The problem is we don't know if there's any way for them to be different or if there is, how likely it is that it would be different enough to matter. And since you can't show anything which says differently, it all boils down to making up stuff about something we don't understand. That's no way to convince people that your god(s) are real.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I've said it a number of times : when scientists say that if things were different they'd be different I agree with them. The problem is we don't know if there's any way for them to be different or if there is, how likely it is that it would be different enough to matter. And since you can't show anything which says differently, it all boils down to making up stuff about something we don't understand. That's no way to convince people that your god(s) are real.
If you are satisfied with we don't know that is your choice. Luckily, scientists don't do that.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What blame?
It is strange how you keep asking questions of others after avoiding answering so many asked of you. Having any luck finding that post where you provided a reference to a scientific paper showing the probability the universe is as it is?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It is strange how you keep asking questions of others after avoiding answering so many asked of you. Having any luck finding that post where you provided a reference to a scientific paper showing the probability the universe is as it is?

Countless people have pointed out the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So how could the physical constants be like pi?
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. You asked me if pi was a physical thing. I said no. Now you are saying that the other constants are thus unlike pi. Are you saying that there is some physical thing called The Cosmological Constant sitting somewhere?
 
Upvote 0

freezerman2000

Living and dying in 3/4 time
Feb 24, 2011
9,525
1,221
South Carolina
✟46,630.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That is true but if I went into it, it would derail this thread. Do you think in all these billions of years it might be a little strange that we haven't bit the dust yet?

Life has survived quite a few near total extinction events..some of those caused by objects hitting the planet...I don't see that as being fine tuned...
If the Universe and our neighborhood was fine tuned,it would have been smooth sailing,without those collisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Stephen Hawking is a proponent of Fine tuning.


“The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers (i.e. the constants of physics) seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life”. “For example,” Hawking writes, “if the electric charge of the electron had been only slightly different, stars would have been unable to burn hydrogen and helium, or else they would not have exploded. It seems clear that there are relatively few ranges of values for the numbers (for the constants) that would allow for development of any form of intelligent life. Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty.” "A Brief History of Time".

Which only goes to show that when these people say such things, they mean something very very different from what you are claiming in this thread.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
So again, you are denying what scientists claim about fine tuning.

Nobody here is ignoring what scientists say.
The problem here is not what scientists say. It's what YOU are concluding from it while pretending that those scientists would agree to YOUR conclusion.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Right, and all those PhD Physicists, cosmologists and astrophysicists are just whistling dixie.

I don't think you'll find a single scientist worth his salt who would disagree with that post.
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
You deny what the scientists in their field claim

I don't. What I'm denying is the conclusion that YOU drew and ascribed to those scientists.

and then claim this is over my head.

Clearly, the point about the deck of cards, DID went straight over your head.

I think I'll take the word of the scientists over KC thanks.

Translation: " I think I'll take my conclusion from the word of the scientists over KC thanks."

I'll go with the scientists on this. Thanks.

Then you should stop inventing your own conclusions while pretending/assuming that scientists would agree with it.
 
Upvote 0

Picky Picky

Old – but wise?
Apr 26, 2012
1,158
453
✟18,550.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. You asked me if pi was a physical thing. I said no. Now you are saying that the other constants are thus unlike pi. Are you saying that there is some physical thing called The Cosmological Constant sitting somewhere?
It's an idea I find convincing: all the Constants sitting on Olympus playing chess and fine tuning their lyres. It would explain a lot.
 
Upvote 0