Think whatever makes you happy.
Simple question - how many of the links you've posted have you read through completely?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Think whatever makes you happy.
I gave you link, put forth the effort.And what is the number they've calculated? Please be specific.
I'll tell you what, you provide evidence that the fine tuning that scientists claim is real is a farce and not true.Yes. Stop assuming that life as we know it is the end goal of the universe. I'm not the first person to have pointed this out to you.
No you didn't. You posted links to random unrelated papers and then changed the subject when challenged to point out how they were in any way related to the question you were attempting to answer.I gave you link
I'll tell you what, you provide evidence that the fine tuning that scientists claim is real is a farce and not true.
If you are satisfied with we don't know that is your choice. Luckily, scientists don't do that.I've said it a number of times : when scientists say that if things were different they'd be different I agree with them. The problem is we don't know if there's any way for them to be different or if there is, how likely it is that it would be different enough to matter. And since you can't show anything which says differently, it all boils down to making up stuff about something we don't understand. That's no way to convince people that your god(s) are real.
If you are satisfied with we don't know that is your choice. Luckily, scientists don't do that.
What blame?Don't do what? Avoid answering questions and try to shift the blame to the person asking?
It is strange how you keep asking questions of others after avoiding answering so many asked of you. Having any luck finding that post where you provided a reference to a scientific paper showing the probability the universe is as it is?What blame?
It is strange how you keep asking questions of others after avoiding answering so many asked of you. Having any luck finding that post where you provided a reference to a scientific paper showing the probability the universe is as it is?
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. You asked me if pi was a physical thing. I said no. Now you are saying that the other constants are thus unlike pi. Are you saying that there is some physical thing called The Cosmological Constant sitting somewhere?So how could the physical constants be like pi?
That is true but if I went into it, it would derail this thread. Do you think in all these billions of years it might be a little strange that we haven't bit the dust yet?
Stephen Hawking is a proponent of Fine tuning.
“The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers (i.e. the constants of physics) seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life”. “For example,” Hawking writes, “if the electric charge of the electron had been only slightly different, stars would have been unable to burn hydrogen and helium, or else they would not have exploded. It seems clear that there are relatively few ranges of values for the numbers (for the constants) that would allow for development of any form of intelligent life. Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty.” "A Brief History of Time".
So again, you are denying what scientists claim about fine tuning.
Right, and all those PhD Physicists, cosmologists and astrophysicists are just whistling dixie.
You deny what the scientists in their field claim
and then claim this is over my head.
I think I'll take the word of the scientists over KC thanks.
I'll go with the scientists on this. Thanks.
It's an idea I find convincing: all the Constants sitting on Olympus playing chess and fine tuning their lyres. It would explain a lot.I'm not sure what you are trying to say. You asked me if pi was a physical thing. I said no. Now you are saying that the other constants are thus unlike pi. Are you saying that there is some physical thing called The Cosmological Constant sitting somewhere?