The fine print on Trump's 'election defense' revels the real reason he refuses to concede

[Archivist]

Last week the US District Court for the Central District of Pennsylvania found against the Trump campaign in a case involving claimed voter fraud. Today the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the District Court opinion. It was an unanimous decision by a three-judge panel.

Since claims have been made in this thread that these decisions were being made by Democratic judges, the District Court judge and all three appellate court judges were Republicans.

 

[hislegacy]

Think about the reasoning behind this piece of fiction that the disgraced Robert Reich penned.

From financial disclosures report in 2019 -

The filings indicate Trump had a minimum revenue of $446 million, with a net worth over $2billion. Robert want people to believe he siphoning off less than 1% of what he made last year for his personal profit?

From last year - he dropped 16 places on Forbes.

If he was money hungry as described - he should have stayed out of office, he would have saved billions.

hislegacy (thought it was good to show the author's economic acumen is rated an F minus by Forbes)

To put it in relationship of money's we can understand easier -

The OP wants us to believe a man who makes 44,600.00 a year is trying to get 400.00. That he is holding onto the office long enough to get another 100.00.

Notice also in the article by the disgraced Robert Reich - even in his sight, the funds are not going directly to the President, but to a super pac on behalf of the President.