The evolving LIES of evolution

[PulpitFiction]

first, look at my previous posts. second, when dad posts all he gets in return is mocking.

Do you think maybe there is a reason* he is mocked so much?

*Excluding tin-foil paranoia.

 

[Maxwell511]

Maybe YOU'RE wrong. Maybe there IS a magnetic field.

"The moon has no global magnetic field like the Earth because it no longer has an internal dynamo"

From this http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/lunmeti.html

No global field=no magnetic moment.

 

[ImmortalTechnique]

if carico, dad, and sacklunch are REALLY the most intellectual creationists on the board, then the movement is in more trouble than i thought

 

[GenesisForGlory]

I've seen carico's arguments, they only look like they'd convince people in my church, but what's the deal with dad and sack?

 

[Nightson]

I've seen carico's arguments, they only look like they'd convince people in my church, but what's the deal with dad and sack?

Dad dreamed up some merged universe where he gets to change all natural laws as he sees fit, his absurditites are astounding.

Sack had a tendency not to listen to replies, and to post the same thing over and over after it's already been refuted.

 

[nvxplorer]

Creationism was created to control the naive masses. It’s of the devil. Creationism is sinful.

 

[RightWingGirl]

Could we get back to the original post?

 

[Pete Harcoff]

if carico, dad, and sacklunch are REALLY the most intellectual creationists on the board, then the movement is in more trouble than i thought

Y'know, thinking about this has actually made me miss JohnR7's posts...

 

[notto]

Alright, who's got the sockpuppet.

 

[Pete Harcoff]

Could we get back to the original post?

What's to get back to? It's just your generic PRATT-filled creationist post. Rather boring, really.

I'd give anything to see some creationists come up with some original posts on these forums.

 

[revolutio]

Well, looks like it's time to bust out the macros.

 

[Sheseala]

Y'know, thinking about this has actually made me miss JohnR7's posts...

JohnR7 did have intelligence behind his posts, sometimes. He also had the oddest sense of humor.

 

[Caphi]

yes, they do. because the big bang suggests that the universe is millions of years old, and thus fits into the "evolutionary time frame" needed for animals to evolve. Its simply not true.

The Big Bang theory suggests nothing of the kind. It could have occurred 4.6 billion years ago, seven hundred trillion years ago, or a thousand years ago. Other evidence points to a 4.6-billion-year-old Universe, and other theories demand it. Intrinsically, the Big Bang makes no claim on the Universe's age.

explain further??

You said something about every human being different, therefore someone must be individually designing each human. Think about snowflakes for a moment.

its uncertain enough that some books have a sticker on them saying "EVOLUTION IS JUST A THEORY". plus, if it werent so certain it wouldnt be up for discussion in kansas now would it??

Okay, someone please post the Theories, Laws and Hypotheses Essay. I'm sure someone here has it on his/her hard drive.

if some have been shown to be fake, like piltdown, why believe anything else they say? they were willing to lie the first time, why not a second time?

The scientific community as a whole did not manufacture these hoaxes. Individuals did. No scientist has claimed Piltdown as a viable evidence since it was discovered to be a forgery, and there's plenty of other valid evidence anyway. Science is a quest, not a conspiracy.

Beats me, I wont judge the man personally. Thats up to god

I always enjoy these kinds of posts. "Well, God's gonna punish them, so I don't care." What a great rebuttal tactic.

 

[pantsman52]

Y'know, thinking about this has actually made me miss JohnR7's posts...

JohnR7, those were the good old days

 

[f U z ! o N]

i miss him too....he's still around i saw him post like a week ago

 

[Caphi]

I hunted down his topics. They really are very entertaining. Totally nonsensical, but entertaining. The only one I couldn't eventually decipher was the one about slugs. <_< Can anyone help?

 

[michabo]

I've seen carico's arguments, they only look like they'd convince people in my church

She does a good job of convincing the convinced, but this is the first time I've heard her described as "intellectual". Scary.

 

[wagsbags]

I can't believe I'm bothering.

throughout history, there have been numerous attempts to bring down christianity. Those involved have used many different tactics as ways to take people away from Jesus.

Good ol "christian are persecuted" argument. In the words of Jon Stewart, "You've pretty much been in charge since, oh, Constantine, I'm just saying, enjoy your success."

first of all, in order to believe in evolution, that means that it had to of elasped over millions and millions of years. however, by dating certain events of the bible, one can discover that the earth cannot be more than 6,000 years old! so evolution either happened over 6000 years(sicentists say no) or it DIDNT HAPPEN AT ALL!! to suggest that evolution only deals with life on earth, is wrong.

You're assuming the bible is literally true. I take it that you're one of the creationists that don't care about evidence because any evidence that contradicts the bible must be wrong. Such a blatant bias means there's no point in debating since you cannot change your mind.

This idea however has some major flaws. Because some of the reported "missing links" have been shown to be fakes. What does this kind of message tell us about those scientists? are those evolutions so desperate to find evidence FOR their theory that they literally make it up?

Sources?

what I witness here, proves my point. often the most intellectual creationists here (carico, dad, sacklunch) are often mocked by the evolutions. rather than give example to their own theory, they spend time mocking Jesus and christianity.

This is nothing short of a lie. Those creationists are mocked because they don't even have a basic understanding of any of the laws of science and still claim to know more than scientists. Isn't pride a sin? Evolutionists on this board don't put forth "their own" theory, unlike creationists they have one, single coherent theory and don't feel the need to make it up and change it depending on the topic of discussion.

 

[FSTDT]

what I witness here, proves my point. often the most intellectual creationists here (carico, dad, sacklunch) are often mocked by the evolutions.

Carico:

"With each 'scientific discovery' ther are other 'scientists' who disagree with them. Calling these facts is ludicrous! Scientists still do not understand thunderstorms, tornadoes, earthquakes, disease, and on and on, and humans have been around for thousands of years!"

Carico, Christian Forums

"[Replying to "I wouldn't want to be friends with somebody who locked people up in his basement and tortured them."]

But if the person who locked you up in the basement gave you a choice to accept his love or be locked up, which would you choose?"

Carico, Christian Forums

"Actually the best way to see if the bible is true or not is to read Christ's words and see if there is one untrue statement in there. For one man to have written words that cannot be proven false is truly a miraculous feat."

Carico, Christian Forums

"If man did what God told him to do there would be NO AIDS, homosexuality, disease, etc. That's the point! But, like children, unbelievers don't want to take responsiblity for their actions. They blame God and everybody else, ANYONE but themselves. They ignore His warnings bout sex, disease, pride, and then wonder why God punishes us! Do you even think?"

Carico, Christian Forums

""Natural selection"?" That is again a term made up by evolutionists to try to explain things they don't understand."

Carico, Christian Forums

Dad:

"How about this, then. The split [between the times when physics did and did not apply to Eden] was not instant, but perhaps never really was completed till during the flood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This makes it entirely possible, as the merged laws were different. Presto- all arguements hitherto used against a canopy no longer valid!!! I like that. With science, then being neutered, this leaves only objections of a biblical nature to be a possible theory killer here.(?) But that's not going to happen, I am almost positive! So, evos, check, and MATE!!"

dad, Christian Forums

"Sorry if I'm not up on the loonie tune theories. I don't believe in any gaps, just 6000 years. And a known spirit world, that has known effects on the physical!"

dad, Christian Forums

"water on mars proof of the flood

Here we see water on mars! When the waters of the flood were dryed with a great wind, it seems some ended up pon mars! Not millions of years ago, thousands!"

dad, Christian Forums

Sacklunch: looks like I dont have any Sacklunch posts in the database, but there hardly much better than the above.

 

[corvus_corax]

throughout history, there have been numerous attempts to bring down christianity.

Throughout history, there have been numberous attempts to bring down satanism
Throughout history, there have been numberous attempts to bring down Islam
Throughout history, there have been numberous attempts to bring down Hinduism
Throughout history, there have been numberous attempts to bring down blah blah blah

Those involved have used many different tactics as ways to take people away from Jesus.

Those involved in the crusades used many different tactics as ways to bring people TO Jesus and to claim land.
The sword was one of the preferred methods.

The truth is never complicated, its always smack in your face and impossible to ignore!

The truth that Christianity has been THE power in the western world for over 1000 years is never complicated, its always a smack in your face and impossible to ignore, so KNOCK IT OFF with the "poor us" persecution complex

So when I heard of evolution in school and college, it always kept me dumbfounded on how someone could support such a uncertain scientific theory.

Uncertain?
It has more evidence backing it up than the theories of gravity.
Oh wait, dont tell me...you probably dont accept gravity either, do you?

Seemingly intelligent men and women supporting flat-out lies,

Havent you heard? It's rude to speak of creationists that way.
Shame on you!

or not presenting the other side of the evolution.

What OTHER SIDE of evolution?
Ah, wait, I get it....you're presenting the false dichotomy argument
Stop it or you dont get a cookie

That other side would be creationism. Creationism has more logic behind it than evolution,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAv (gasp...wheeze) HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

and i will give my reasoning below..

Alright, sure, let's see your reasoning...

first of all, in order to believe in evolution, that means that it had to of elasped over millions and millions of years. however, by dating certain events of the bible, one can discover that the earth cannot be more than 6,000 years old!

This argument will only convince a jew or christian.
People who dont believe in the bible most likely wont believe that the earth is supposedly 6000 years old

Heck, many many many many people who DO believe in the innerant bible, and are Creationists themselves, dont believe in a 6000 year old earth

But of course, you're just proposing YOUR PERSONAL interpretation of the bible, which means jack-nothing to us.

so evolution either happened over 6000 years(sicentists say no) or it DIDNT HAPPEN AT ALL!!

Again, your assertion that your PERSONAL INTERPRETATION of scripture means nothing at all
Have fun, though, believing that it means something

to suggest that evolution only deals with life on earth, is wrong. because it also makes references to other forums of science. including the big bang.

Evolution does not matter to the big bang theory, just as it doesnt matter to the theories of gravity.
It DOES matter, however, to the foundation of all modern biology. You can thank evolutionary theory for many advances in the medical field.
What has creationism contributed?
Oh, right...

it is often told, that we did not evolve from modern apes or monkeys, but rather us and them share a common ancestor. This idea however has some major flaws. Because some of the reported "missing links" have been shown to be fakes. What does this kind of message tell us about those scientists? are those evolutions so desperate to find evidence FOR their theory that they literally make it up?

Ahem.....fakes happen, both in scientific pursuit and in religion
There was an inscribed stone that supposedly confirmed the evidence of solomon's temple.
Fake
There was an ossuary that supposedly held the bones of "James, brother of Jesus"
Fake.
What does this kind of message tell us about Christians? are those christians so desperate to find evidence FOR their bible that they literally make it up?

It seems that evolution is the conclusion that scientists make, and now they search desperately for the evidence! how laughable!!

Desperately?
You obviously dont know ANYTHING about evolutionary theory when you make statements like this
Even AiG says that the evidence is there.

you can look at any two animals on earth, and notice that they are almost identical. however no two people on earth are alike, we look vastly different from each other! humans HAD to of been designed by a higher power.

That's just like a caucasian saying that "all orientals look alike", and such a statement is pathetic at best.
The animals "look alike" only to people like you
The animals have NO trouble telling each other apart by using their senses.

what I witness here, proves my point. often the most intellectual creationists here (carico, dad, sacklunch) are often mocked by the evolutions.

You're new here arent you?
They are generally "mocked" (if you wish to use that term) due to the fact that we have witnessed them post PRATT after PRATT, and spout pure absolute nonsense (in the case of dad).

rather than give example to their own theory

Our examples have been given time and again, but we get tired of telling the same people (like dad, carico and sacky) the same thing TIME AND AGAIN

they spend time mocking Jesus and christianity

Quotes please
And not just one or two quotes. I want at least several dozen, as your accusation is all inclusive.
Of course, you cant provide such, so I wont hold my breath

this kind of nonsense however, is not new, it's been done in the past, and will continue to happen in the future.

You mean like the nonsense you're trying to pull?
I have yet to see you post ONE piece of empirical evidence that supports Creationism.
Better yet, since you seem SO SURE of your statements, why dont you produce the obviously massive proponderance of empirical evidence that supports YEC creationism.
Of course, you cant provide such, so I wont bother hold my breath.

the only thing I can say is, with time we will continue to find flaws with evolutionism, and eventually it will become a thing of the past.

the only thing I can say is, with time we will continue to find flaws with YEC Creationism, and eventually it will become a thing of the past

like when scientists said the earth was flat, or said we would never walk on the moon.. we owe or Lord thanks.

Mind your words AngryNotice
It was NOT "creation science" that sent us to the moon, neither was it "Creation science" that empirically demonstrated the spherical shape of the earth.