• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Evolution of Morality

Status
Not open for further replies.

nuttypiglet

Newbie
Mar 23, 2012
639
2
✟23,299.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

invoke mystical memory west african religions? now that's a new one and I have no idea what it means to infer.
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟236,977.00
Faith
Seeker

Words don't always mean one thing.
 
Upvote 0

nuttypiglet

Newbie
Mar 23, 2012
639
2
✟23,299.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


If morality evolved, you would expect some of this to be hard coded, like the way an infant has to learn to distinguish sight from sound because the two are linked at birth. Like the way an infant is hard coded to learn to use its limbs and grasp things. Pretty much everything else must be learned, surely? Just as we have to learn what pain feels like. We all have the ability to feel pain, but we still need to experience it to know what it is. Even among the same society, morals are across a huge scale. You have those at one extreme who can rape and murder while feeling no remorse. At the other end you have those who spend most of their time helping the elderly or sick. It's obviously something greatly influenced as it develops, while we grow up. It can change at any time in life too, depending on circumstances. Even the nicest people can suddenly become the worst nightmare for a society. This makes me strongly believe that it's simply CHOICE we are dealing with here. Nothing to do with having evolved, it's simply choosing the type of person we would like to be. It can be seen as having to do with the best way to protect our species, or at least our loved ones, but it's also a very individual thing. If a man held a gun to your childs head and you knew he would pull the trigger, would you shoot him to stop this? A huge number of people would shoot, but then you will always get those who wouldn't. In such a case it seems we need to override certain values washed into us, such as you must respect life and not kill. Some seem to find this very difficult to overcome, no matter the circumstances, and would find it hard to live with themselves if they killed someone. Perhaps this is a form of hard wiring behavioural pattern which we develop when growing up, which can be broken apart if forced enough. We also see many suicides which would go against morals in reality. If someone feels they can't be accepted by a society or have too many mishaps to deal with, we have some kind of self destruct button built in. Again many can override this, but there are a few who cannot. I can't believe it has anything to do with evolution, I think it's just a learning process which many life forms perform. Nearly all mammals for example, and birds, watch their parents to learn how they react to different circumstances and deal with them. We learn what is acceptable and what is not. Very interesting topic though.​
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

What I am understanding from your post is that you don't believe that there is a morality ingrained within us but that we learn the behavior. However, we see that people raised in the same home with the same moral lessons can be very different in their morality. We see people that go against moral constraints which I attribute to free will. I do not agree that morality is an evolved trait but something that God ingrained into our being. That is at least how I see it.
 
Upvote 0

biggles53

Junior Member
Mar 5, 2008
2,819
63
72
Pottsville, NSW, Australia
✟25,841.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
AU-Greens

Be careful to distinguish between morality and behaviour....Much of what you mentioned above was about people choosing to behave in a particular way, even though they may have been quite aware that to do so was morally inappropriate.

Better examples would have been where people behave badly, yet think that they were doing the right thing.....

Just like your god on many occasions........
 
Upvote 0

biggles53

Junior Member
Mar 5, 2008
2,819
63
72
Pottsville, NSW, Australia
✟25,841.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
AU-Greens

Yet, there is plenty of evidence for the one and none for the other....
 
Upvote 0

nuttypiglet

Newbie
Mar 23, 2012
639
2
✟23,299.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

But what I said is morality is simply our choice of how we behave. Behaviour is not hard wired. I think what IS hard wired is our ability to make choices on how we behave. Is this through evolution? I personally don't think so.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
What empirical evidence do you find for morality?

Interesting study from the University of Chicago in which the professors have commenting about how evolution has hard wired parts of the brain to react in certain situations that include moral judgements.

The ability to recognize and respond emotionally to the intentional infliction of harm is a critical source of morality that is universal across cultures, researchers believe. “It is part of humans’ evolutionary heritage,” Decety said. “The long history of mammalian evolution has shaped our brains to be sensitive to signs of suffering of others. And this constitutes a natural foundation for morality and sensitivity to justice.” -

Moral evaluations of harm are instant and emotional, brain study shows | UChicago News
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I'd like you to explain how you see this in regards to self preservation?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'd like you to explain how you see this in regards to self preservation?

This particular study addresses the instant moral reaction that would impact the preservation of others, when there are groups of people involved. Humans are social creatures and this study, in the opinion of the professors, shows the evolution of this reaction over time.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Is this morality? Is it empathy? Is it a fight or flight response? How do these professors define what is happening in those moments of instant reaction? In another study that I've read, the moral reaction in the study subjects were different if there were explanations of the actions presented in a moral light or if the explanation was not given. IF the explanations were given a moral reason the reaction was different (considered moral) than those who were given no explanation for the immoral act and it was viewed immoral. So in this study it was determined that morality was altered if given a moral reason for the act that would normally viewed as immoral.
 
Upvote 0

nuttypiglet

Newbie
Mar 23, 2012
639
2
✟23,299.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

exactly, I totally agree. I am also confused as to how we can determine if it's hard wired into us. To really prove this, you would have to witness moral judgement at a very young age indeed, basically just after birth. Otherwise, how could you possibly be sure if it is wired hard by evolution, or something which develops over time because it requires knowledge first. What moral decisions do we see being made by other mammals? How could we know if they are morally based?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

The whole purpose of the design of this study, was the immediate reaction to the stimuli and the reaction was indeed immediate, which led them to believe the judgement of an immoral act was hard wired into the brain through evolution. Makes perfect sense in the light of what the study showing, since groups of people can not evolve and survive as well without this reaction.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

They address your questions in their observations, just read it.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

The scientists here are calling it morality, likely because the portion of the brain that controls morality lights up. Your other questions are pretty much addressed in the article.

If you want to reject what they say the findings mean, go ahead, it's no skin off my nose.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.