And they all deal with electromagnetism (EU/PC theory). So apparently you don't understand physics.
Don't patronise me.
Maxwell adopted a couple of equations already in existence, modified Ampere's Law, and gave a mathematical formulation to Faraday's Law. On the basis of which, he predicted the existence of electromagnetic radiation.
And Amperes Law is once again electrodynamics. As well as Faraday's law, and Lorentz and Gauss. As well as electromagnetic radiation, hence the prefix electro that you ignore.
Einstein generalised Galileo's Principle of Relativity, to take account of the troubling fact that the electromagnetic radiation predicted by Maxwell was dependent upon no particular frame of reference. Since his new theory was incompatible with Newtonian Gravity, he later published a new theory of Gravity.
And since light travels at c in every single frame of reference, supported by Relativity, it depends on no particular frame of reference. Hence his only peer reviewed paper "On the
ELECTRODYNAMICS of Moving Bodies"
Schrodinger is mostly remembered for his Wave Equation, and for showing that his theory was equivalent to Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics.
A wave equation dealing with electrodynamics. Dealing with electron energy states, not gravitational.
Dirac began the process of incorporating Electromagnetism into Quantum Theory, and predicted the existence of the Positron.
Electrodynamics once again. A positron, a charged particle that can not be explained gravitationally.
Positron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The positron has an
electric charge of +1e, a
spin of ½, and has the same mass as an electron."
NONE of them had anything to do with your pile of excrement.
ALL of them had everything to do with electrodynamics, and nothing at all to do with gravity, whatever that is. Just another EM phenomenon is all.
And since this is supposed to be an EU free thread, there will be no more responses to your nonsense from me. Even your colleague managed to avoid turning it into one.
So in other words you will continue to ignore all the achievements of people in electrodynamics in all of your theories. And instead you will continue believing in theories that require you to have faith in 96% of undetectable and unexplainable Fairie Dust. par for the course.
I didn't start it you did, I simply asked one question of what Fairie Dust they wanted to discuss.
http://www.christianforums.com/t7814145-3/#post65334044
It is only you that thinks every scientific discovery since the 1800's hasn't involved electrodynamics in one form or another.